The assumptions behind disabling error recovery for the `apply` tactic
no longer seem to hold, since tactic combinators like `first` themselves
disable error recovery when it makes sense.
This addresses part of #3831
Breaking change: `elabTermForApply` no longer uses `withoutRecover`.
Tactics using `elabTermForApply` should evaluate whether it makes sense
to wrap it with `withoutRecover`, which is generally speaking when it's
used to elaborate identifiers.
Makes the error messages report on RHSs and LHSs that do not match the
expected values when the relations are defeq. If the relations are not
defeq, the error message now no longer mentions the value of the whole
`calc` expression.
Adds a field to `mkCoe` with an optional callback to use to generate
error messages.
Note: it is tempting to try to make use of expected types when
elaborating the `calc` expression, but this runs into issue #2073.
Closes#4318
Adds ability to chain congruence lemmas when a function's arity is less
than the number of supplied arguments. This improves `congr` as well as
all conv tactics implemented using `congr`, like `arg` and `enter`.
(The non-conv `congr` tactic still needs to be fixed.)
Toward #2942.
Followup to #5841. Makes the `structure` command populate the new
`parentInfo` field with all the structures in the `extends` clause.
This will require a stage0 update to fully take effect.
Breaking change: now it's a warning if a structure extends a parent
multiple times.
Breaking change: now `getParentStructures` is `getStructureSubobjects`.
Adds `getStructureParentInfo` for getting all the immediate parents.
Note that the set of subobjects is neither a subset nor a superset of
the immediate parents.
Closes#1881
This default instance makes it possible to write things like `m!"the
constant is {.ofConstName n}"`.
Breaking change: This weakly causes terms to have a type of
`MessageData` if their type is otherwise unknown. For example:
* `m!"... {x} ..."` can cause `x` to have type `MessageData`, causing
the `let` definition of `x` to fail to elaborate. Fix: give `x` an
explicit type.
* Arithmetic expressions in `m!` strings may need a type ascription. For
example, if the type of `i` is unknown at the time the arithmetic
expression is elaborated, then `m!"... {i + 1} ..."` can fail saying
that it cannot find an `HAdd Nat Nat MessageData` instance. Two fixes:
either ensure that the type of `i` is known, or add a type ascription to
guide the `MessageData` coercion, like `m!"... {(i + 1 : Nat)} ..."`.
Using the same strategy as #5852 this provides `bv_decide` support for
`Bool` and `BitVec` ifs
this in turn instantly enables support for:
- `sdiv`
- `smod`
- `abs`
and thus closes our last discrepancies to QF_BV!
This is the first step towards fixing the issue of not having mutual
recursion between the `Bool` and `BitVec` fragment of `QF_BV` in
`bv_decide`. This PR adds support for `BitVec.ofBool` by doing the
following:
1. Introduce a new mechanism into the reification engine that allows us
to add additional lemmas to the top level on the fly as we are
traversing the expression tree.
2. If we encounter an expression `BitVec.ofBool boolExpr` we reify
`boolExpr` and then abstract `BitVec.ofBool boolExpr` as some atom `a`
3. We add two lemmas `boolExpr = true -> a = 1#1` and `boolExpr = false
-> a = 0#1`. This mirrors the full behavior of `BitVec.ofBool` and thus
makes our atom `a` correctly interpreted again.
In order to do the reification in step 2 mutual recursion in the
reification engine is required. For this reason I started pulling out
logic from the, now rather large, mutual block into other files and
document the invariants that they assume explicitly.
A step of expanding structure instances is to determine all the default
values, and part of this is reducing projections that appear in the
default values so that they get replaced with the user-provided values.
Binder types in foralls, lambdas, and lets have to be reduced too.
Closes#2186
Refactors the `structure` command to support recursive structures. These
are disabled for now, pending additional elaborator support in #5822.
This refactor is also a step toward `structure` appearing in `mutual`
blocks.
Error reporting is now more precise, and this fixes an issue where
general errors could appear on the last field. Adds "don't know how to
synthesize placeholder" errors for default values.
Closes#2512
`generalize ... at *` sometimes will try to modify the recursive
hypothesis corresponding to the current theorem being defined, which may
not be the expected behaviour. It should only try to `generalize`
hypotheses that it can actually modify and are visible, not
implementation details. Otherwise this means that there are
discrepancies between `generalize ... at *` and `generalize ... at H`,
even though `H` is the only hypothesis in the context.
This commit uses `getLocalHyps` instead of `getFVarIds` to get the
current valid `FVarIds` in the context. This uses
`isImplementationDetail` to filter out `FVarIds` that are implementation
details in the context and are not visible to the user and should not be
manipulated by `generalize`.
Closes#4845
Closes#3146
Reduction doesn't trigger correctly on the bodies of `let`-expressions
in `StructInst`, leading some meta-variables to linger in the terms of
some fields. Because of this, default fields may try multiple times (and
fail) to be generated, leading to an unexpected error.
The solution implemented here is to modify the values of the introduced
variables in the local context so as to reduce them correctly.
Add an example Lean file that includes an unusually large definition
that takes a long time to elaborate.
It may be that it's difficult to process it more efficiently, but
perhaps someone will discover a way to improve it if it's in the
benchmark suite. Improved performance on this benchmark will likely make
some program analysis and verification tasks within Lean more feasible.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Ullrich <sebasti@nullri.ch>
Example new output:
```text
failed to compile 'partial' definition 'checkMyList', could not prove that the type
ListNode → Bool × ListNode
is nonempty.
This process uses multiple strategies:
- It looks for a parameter that matches the return type.
- It tries synthesizing 'Inhabited' and 'Nonempty' instances for the return type.
- It tries unfolding the return type.
If the return type is defined using the 'structure' or 'inductive' command, you can try
adding a 'deriving Nonempty' clause to it.
```
The inhabitation prover now also unfolds definitions when trying to
prove inhabitation. For example,
```lean
def T (α : Type) := α × α
partial def f (n : Nat) : T Nat := f n
```
Motivated [by
Zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/113489-new-members/topic/Why.20return.20type.20of.20partial.20function.20MUST.20.60inhabited.60.3F/near/477905312)
Refactors `inductive` elaborator to keep track of universe level
parameters created during elaboration of `variable`s and binders. This
fixes an issue in Mathlib where its `Type*` elaborator can result in
unexpected universe levels.
For example, in
```lean4
variable {F : Type*}
inductive I1 (A B : Type*) (x : F) : Type
```
before this change the signature would be
```
I1.{u_1, u_2} {F : Type u_1} (A : Type u_1) (B : Type u_2) (x : F) : Type
```
but now it is
```
I1.{u_1, u_2, u_3} {F : Type u_1} (A : Type u_2) (B : Type u_3) (x : F) : Type
```
Fixes this for the `axiom` elaborator too.
Adds more accurate universe level validation for mutual inductives.
Breaking change: removes `Lean.Elab.Command.expandDeclId`. Use
`Lean.Elab.Term.expandDeclId` from within `runCommandElabM`.
It's difficult to distinguish theorems from regular definitions in the
completion menu, which is annoying when using completion for searching
one or the other. This PR makes theorem completions use the "Eureka!"
icon ()
to distinguish them more clearly from other completions.
NB: We are very limited in terms of which icons we can pick here since
[the completion kinds provided by LSP / VS
Code](https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/editor/intellisense#_types-of-completions)
are optimized for object-oriented programming languages, but I think
this choice strikes a nice balance between being easy to identify,
having some visual connection to theorem proving and not being used a
lot in other languages and thus not clashing with pre-existing
associations.
Previously `RecursorVal.getInduct` would return the prefix of the
recursor’s name, which is unlikely the right value for the “derived”
recursors in nested recursion. The code using `RecursorVal.getInduct`
seems to expect the name of the inductive type of major argument here.
If we return that name, this fixes#5661.
This bug becomes more visible now that we have structural mutual
recursion.
Also, to avoid confusion, renames the function to ``getMajorInduct`.
This PR resolves the following issues related to goal state display:
1. In a new line after a `case` tactic with a completed proof, the state
of the proof in the `case` would be displayed, not the proof state after
the `case`
1. In the range of `next =>` / `case' ... =>`, the state of the proof in
the corresponding case would not be displayed, whereas this is true for
`case`
1. In the `suffices ... by` tactic, the tactic state of the `by` block
was not displayed after the `by` and before the first tactic
The incorrect goal state after `case` was caused by `evalCase` adding a
`TacticInfo` with the full block proof state for the full range of the
`case` block that the goal state selection has no means of
distinguishing from the `TacticInfo` with the same range that contains
the state after the whole `case` block. Narrowing the range of this
`TacticInfo` to `case ... =>` fixed this issue.
The lack of a case proof state on `next =>` was caused by the `case`
syntax that `next` expands to receiving noncanonical synthetic
`SourceInfo`, which is usually ignored by the language server. Adding a
token antiquotation for `next` fixed this issue.
The lack of a case proof state on `case' ... =>` was caused by
`evalCase'` not adding a `TacticInfo` with the full block state to the
range of `case' ... =>`. Adding this `TacticInfo` fixed this issue.
The tactic state of the block not being displayed after the `by` was
caused by the macro expansion of `suffices` to `have` not transferring
the trailing whitespace of the `by`. Ensuring that this trailing
whitespace information is transferred fixed this issue.
Fixes#2881.
Should ensure we visit at most as many expr nodes as in the final expr
instead of many possibly overlapping mvar assignments. This is likely
the only way we can ensure acceptable performance in all cases.
---------
Co-authored-by: Kim Morrison <kim@tqft.net>
I made a few choices so far that can probably be discussed:
- got rid of `modn` on `UInt`, nobody seems to use it apart from the
definition of `shift` which can use normal `mod`
- removed the previous defeq optimized definition of `USize.size` in
favor for a normal one. The motivation was to allow `OfNat` to work
which doesn't seem to be necessary anymore afaict.
- Minimized uses of `.val`, should we maybe mark it deprecated?
- Mostly got rid of `.val` in basically all theorems as the proper next
level of API would now be `.toBitVec`. We could probably re-prove them
but it would be more annoying given the change of definition.
- Did not yet redefine `log2` in terms of `BitVec` as this would require
a `log2` in `BitVec` as well, do we want this?
- I added a couple of theorems around the relation of `<` on `UInt` and
`Nat`. These were previously not needed because defeq was used all over
the place to save us. I did not yet generalize these to all types as I
wasn't sure if they are the appropriate lemma that we want to have.
This takes a few standalone bitvector problems, about inequalties, from
LNSym, and adds them as a benchmark to prevent further regressions with
bv_decide.
These problems are particularly interesting, because they've previously
had a bad interaction with bv_decides normalization pass, see
https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/5664.
---------
Co-authored-by: Henrik Böving <hargonix@gmail.com>
