It's difficult to distinguish theorems from regular definitions in the
completion menu, which is annoying when using completion for searching
one or the other. This PR makes theorem completions use the "Eureka!"
icon ()
to distinguish them more clearly from other completions.
NB: We are very limited in terms of which icons we can pick here since
[the completion kinds provided by LSP / VS
Code](https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/editor/intellisense#_types-of-completions)
are optimized for object-oriented programming languages, but I think
this choice strikes a nice balance between being easy to identify,
having some visual connection to theorem proving and not being used a
lot in other languages and thus not clashing with pre-existing
associations.
This PR resolves the following issues related to goal state display:
1. In a new line after a `case` tactic with a completed proof, the state
of the proof in the `case` would be displayed, not the proof state after
the `case`
1. In the range of `next =>` / `case' ... =>`, the state of the proof in
the corresponding case would not be displayed, whereas this is true for
`case`
1. In the `suffices ... by` tactic, the tactic state of the `by` block
was not displayed after the `by` and before the first tactic
The incorrect goal state after `case` was caused by `evalCase` adding a
`TacticInfo` with the full block proof state for the full range of the
`case` block that the goal state selection has no means of
distinguishing from the `TacticInfo` with the same range that contains
the state after the whole `case` block. Narrowing the range of this
`TacticInfo` to `case ... =>` fixed this issue.
The lack of a case proof state on `next =>` was caused by the `case`
syntax that `next` expands to receiving noncanonical synthetic
`SourceInfo`, which is usually ignored by the language server. Adding a
token antiquotation for `next` fixed this issue.
The lack of a case proof state on `case' ... =>` was caused by
`evalCase'` not adding a `TacticInfo` with the full block state to the
range of `case' ... =>`. Adding this `TacticInfo` fixed this issue.
The tactic state of the block not being displayed after the `by` was
caused by the macro expansion of `suffices` to `have` not transferring
the trailing whitespace of the `by`. Ensuring that this trailing
whitespace information is transferred fixed this issue.
Fixes#2881.
This PR ensures that deprecated declarations are displayed with a
strikethrough markup in the completion popup of VS Code and that the
docstring of a completion item denotes the meta-data of the deprecation.
The `decide!` tactic is like `decide`, but when it tries reducing the
`Decidable` instance it uses kernel reduction rather than the
elaborator's reduction.
The kernel ignores transparency, so it can unfold all definitions (for
better or for worse). Furthermore, by using kernel reduction we can
cache the result as an auxiliary lemma — this is more efficient than
`decide`, which needs to reduce the instance twice: once in the
elaborator to check whether the tactic succeeds, and once again in the
kernel during final typechecking.
While RFC #5629 proposes a `decide!` that skips checking altogether
during elaboration, with this PR's `decide!` we can use `decide!` as
more-or-less a drop-in replacement for `decide`, since the tactic will
fail if kernel reduction fails.
This PR also includes two small fixes:
- `blameDecideReductionFailure` now uses `withIncRecDepth`.
- `Lean.Meta.zetaReduce` now instantiates metavariables while zeta
reducing.
Some profiling:
```lean
set_option maxRecDepth 2000
set_option trace.profiler true
set_option trace.profiler.threshold 0
theorem thm1 : 0 < 1 := by decide!
theorem thm1' : 0 < 1 := by decide
theorem thm2 : ∀ x < 400, x * x ≤ 160000 := by decide!
theorem thm2' : ∀ x < 400, x * x ≤ 160000 := by decide
/-
[Elab.command] [0.003655] theorem thm1 : 0 < 1 := by decide!
[Elab.command] [0.003164] theorem thm1' : 0 < 1 := by decide
[Elab.command] [0.133223] theorem thm2 : ∀ x < 400, x * x ≤ 160000 := by decide!
[Elab.command] [0.252310] theorem thm2' : ∀ x < 400, x * x ≤ 160000 := by decide
-/
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de>
This PR enables tactic completion in the whitespace of a tactic proof
and adds tactic docstrings to the completion menu.
Future work:
- A couple of broken tactic completions: This is due to tactic
completion now using @david-christiansen's `Tactic.Doc.allTacticDocs` to
obtain the tactic docstrings and should be fixed soon.
- Whitespace tactic completion in tactic combinators: This requires
changing the syntax of tactic combinators to produce a syntax node that
makes it clear that a tactic is expected at the given position.
Closes#1651.
This refactors and improves the `#eval` command, introducing some new
features.
* Now evaluated results can be represented using `ToExpr` and pretty
printing. This means **hoverable output**. If `ToExpr` fails, it then
tries `Repr` and then `ToString`. The `eval.pp` option controls whether
or not to try `ToExpr`.
* There is now **auto-derivation** of `Repr` instances, enabled with the
`pp.derive.repr` option (default to **true**). For example:
```lean
inductive Baz
| a | b
#eval Baz.a
-- Baz.a
```
It simply does `deriving instance Repr for Baz` when there's no way to
represent `Baz`. If core Lean gets `ToExpr` derive handlers, they could
be used here as well.
* The option `eval.type` controls whether or not to include the type in
the output. For now the default is false.
* Now things like `#eval do return 2` work. It tries using
`CommandElabM`, `TermElabM`, or `IO` when the monad is unknown.
* Now there is no longer `Lean.Eval` or `Lean.MetaEval`. These each used
to be responsible for both adapting monads and printing results. The
concerns have been split into two. (1) The `MonadEval` class is
responsible for adapting monads for evaluation (it is similar to
`MonadLift`, but instances are allowed to use default data when
initializing state) and (2) finding a way to represent results is
handled separately.
* Error messages about failed instance synthesis are now more precise.
Once it detects that a `MonadEval` class applies, then the error message
will be specific about missing `ToExpr`/`Repr`/`ToString` instances.
* Fixes a bug where `Repr`/`ToString` instances can't be found by
unfolding types "under the monad". For example, this works now:
```lean
def Foo := List Nat
def Foo.mk (l : List Nat) : Foo := l
#eval show Lean.CoreM Foo from do return Foo.mk [1,2,3]
```
* Elaboration errors now abort evaluation. This eliminates some
not-so-relevant error messages.
* Now evaluating a value of type `m Unit` never prints a blank message.
* Fixes bugs where evaluating `MetaM` and `CoreM` wouldn't collect log
messages.
The `run_cmd`, `run_elab`, and `run_meta` commands are now frontends for
`#eval`.
Where before we had
```lean
#check fun x : Nat => ?a
-- fun x ↦ ?m.7 x : (x : Nat) → ?m.6 x
```
Now by default we have
```lean
#check fun x : Nat => ?a
-- fun x => ?a : (x : Nat) → ?m.6 x
```
In particular, delayed assignment metavariables such as `?m.7` pretty
print using the name of the metavariable they are delayed assigned to,
suppressing the bound variables used in the delayed assignment (hence
`?a` rather than `?a x`). Hovering over `?a` shows `?m.7 x`.
The benefit is that users can see the user-provided name in local
contexts. A justification for this pretty printing choice is that `?m.7
x` is supposed to stand for `?a`, and furthermore it is just as opaque
to assignment in defeq as `?a` is (however, when synthetic opaque
metavariables are made assignable, delayed assignments can be a little
less assignable than true synthetic opaque metavariables).
The original pretty printing behavior can be recovered using `set_option
pp.mvars.delayed true`.
This PR also extends the documentation for holes and synthetic holes,
with some technical details about what delayed assignments are. This
likely should be moved to the reference manual, but for now it is
included in this docstring.
(This PR is a simplified version of #3494, which has a round-trippable
notation for delayed assignments. The pretty printing in this PR is
unlikely to round trip, but it is better than the current situation,
which is that delayed assignment metavariables never round trip, and
plus it does not require introducing a new notation.)
Recall that currently named arguments suppress all explicit parameters
that are dependencies. This PR limits this feature to only apply to true
structure projections, except in the case where it is triggered when
there are no more positional arguments. This preserves the primary
reason for generalizing this feature (issue #1851), while removing the
generalized feature, which has led to numerous confusions (issue #1867).
This also fixes a bug pointed out [on
Zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/270676-lean4/topic/.40foo.20.28A.20.3A.3D.20bar.29.20_.20_/near/468564862)
where in `@` mode, instance implicit parameter dependencies to named
arguments would be suppressed unless the next positional argument was
`_`.
More detail:
* The `NamedArg` structure now has a `suppressDeps : Bool` field. It is
set to `true` for the `self` argument in structure projections. If there
is such a `NamedArg`, explicit parameters that are dependencies to the
named argument are turned into implicit arguments. The consequence is
that *all* structure projections are treated as if their type parameters
are implicit, even for class projections. This flag is *not* used for
generalized field notation.
* We preserve the suppression feature when there are no positional
arguments remaining. This feature pre-dates the fix to issue #1851, and
it is useful when combining named arguments and the eta expansion
feature, since dependencies of named arguments cannot be turned into eta
arguments. Plus, there are examples of the form `rw [lem (h := foo)]`
where `lem` has explicit arguments that `h` depends on.
* For instance implicit parameters in explicit mode, now `_` arguments
register terminfo and are hoverable.
* Now `..` is respected in explicit mode.
This implements RFC #5397. The `suppressDeps` flag suggests a future
possibility of a named argument syntax that can suppress dependencies.
Adds a mechanism where when an autoparam tactic fails to synthesize a
parameter, the associated parameter name or field name for the autoparam
is reported in an error.
Examples:
```text
could not synthesize default value for parameter 'h' using tactics
could not synthesize default value for field 'inv' of 'S' using tactics
```
Notes:
* Autoparams now run their tactics without any error recovery or
error-to-sorry enabled. This enables catching the error and reporting
the contextual information. This is justified on the grounds that
autoparams are not interactive.
* Autoparams for applications now cleanup the autoParam annotation,
bringing it in line with autoparams for structure fields.
* This preserves the old behavior that autoparams leave terminfo, but we
will revisit this after some imminent improvements to the unused
variable linter.
Closes#2950
Modifies how the declaration command elaborator reports when there are
unassigned metavariables. The visible effects are that (1) now errors
like "don't know how to synthesize implicit argument" and "failed to
infer 'let' declaration type" take precedence over universe level
issues, (2) universe level metavariables are reported as metavariables
(rather than as `u_1`, `u_2`, etc.), and (3) if the universe level
metavariables appear in `let` binding types or `fun` binder types, the
error is localized there.
Motivation: Reporting unsolved expression metavariables is more
important than universe level issues (typically universe issues are from
unsolved expression metavariables). Furthermore, `let` and `fun` binders
can't introduce universe polymorphism, so we can "blame" such bindings
for universe metavariables, if possible.
Example 1: Now the errors are on `x` and `none` (reporting expression
metavariables) rather than on `example` (which reported universe level
metavariables).
```lean
example : IO Unit := do
let x := none
pure ()
```
Example 2: Now there is a "failed to infer universe levels in 'let'
declaration type" error on `PUnit`.
```lean
def foo : IO Unit := do
let x : PUnit := PUnit.unit
pure ()
```
In more detail:
* `elabMutualDef` used to turn all level mvars into fresh level
parameters before doing an analysis for "hidden levels". This analysis
turns out to be exactly the same as instead creating fresh parameters
for level mvars in only pre-definitions' types and then looking for
level metavariables in their bodies. With this PR, error messages refer
to the same level metavariables in the Infoview, rather than obscure
generated `u_1`, `u_2`, ... level parameters.
* This PR made it possible to push the "hidden levels" check into
`addPreDefinitions`, after the checks for unassigned expression mvars.
It used to be that if the "hidden levels" check produced an "invalid
occurrence of universe level" error it would suppress errors for
unassigned expression mvars, and now it is the other way around.
* There is now a list of `LevelMVarErrorInfo` objects in the `TermElabM`
state. These record expressions that should receive a localized error if
they still contain level metavariables. Currently `let` expressions and
binder types in general register such info. Error messages make use of a
new `exposeLevelMVars` function that adds pretty printer annotations
that try to expose all universe level metavariables.
* When there are universe level metavariables, for error recovery the
definition is still added to the environment after assigning each
metavariable to level 0.
* There's a new `Lean.Util.CollectLevelMVars` module for collecting
level metavariables from expressions.
Closes#2058
This solves the issue where certain subexpressions are lacking syntax
hovers because the hover text is not "builtin" - it only shows up if the
`Parser` constant is imported in the environment. For top level syntaxes
this is not a problem because `builtin_term_parser` will automatically
add this doc information, but nested syntaxes don't get the same
treatment.
We could walk the expression and add builtin docs recursively, but this
is somewhat expensive and unnecessary given that it's a fixed list of
declarations in lean core. Moreover, there are reasons to want to
control which syntax nodes actually get hovers, and while a better
system for that is forthcoming, for now it can be achieved by
strategically not applying the `@[builtin_doc]` attribute.
Fixes#3842
When the elaborator doesn't provide us with any `CompletionInfo`, we
currently provide no completions whatsoever. But in many cases, we can
still provide some helpful identifier completions without elaborator
information. This PR adds a fallback mode for this situation.
There is more potential here, but this should be a good start.
In principle, this issue alleviates #5172 (since we now provide
completions in these contexts). I'll leave it up to an elaboration
maintainer whether we also want to ensure that the completion infos are
provided correctly in these cases.
Fixes#4455, fixes#4705, fixes#5219
Also fixes a minor bug where a dot in brackets would report incorrect
completions instead of no completions.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Ullrich <sebasti@nullri.ch>
This renames `BitVec.getLsb` to `getLsbD` (`D` for "default" value, i.e.
false), and introduces `getLsb?` and `getLsb'` (which we can rename to
`getLsb` after a deprecation cycle).
(Similarly for `getMsb`.)
Also adds a `GetElem` class so we can use `x[i]` and `x[i]?` notation.
Later, we will turn
```
theorem getLsbD_eq_getElem?_getD (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) (h : i < w) :
x.getLsbD i = x[i]?.getD false
```
on as a `@[simp]` lemma.
This PR doesn't attempt to demonstrate the benefits, but I think both
arguments are going to get easier, and this will bring the BitVec API
closer in line to List/Array, etc.
---------
Co-authored-by: Markus Himmel <markus@lean-fro.org>
in principle we'd like to use the existing parser
```
"?" >> (ident <|> hole)
```
but somehow annotate it so that hovering the `hole` will not show the
hole's hover. But for now it was easier to just change the parser to
```
"?" >> (ident <|> "_")
```
and be done with it.
Fixes#5021
Fixes an issue where each alternative in choice nodes would get their
own arguments. Now cdot function expansion is aware of choice nodes.
Also modifies the variable naming so that multi-argument functions like
`(· + ·)` expand as `fun x1 x2 => x1 + x2` rather than `fun x x_1 => x +
x_1`.
Closes#4832
Autoparam tactic scripts have no source positions, which until recently
made it so that any errors or messages would be logged at the current
ref, which was the application or structure instance being elaborated.
However, with the new incrementality features the ref is now carefully
managed to avoid leakage of outside data. This inhibits the elaborator's
ref from being used for the tactic's ref, causing messages to be placed
at the beginning of the file rather than on the syntax that triggered
the autoparam.
To fix this, now the elaborators insert the ref's source position
everywhere into the autoparam tactic script.
If in the future messages for synthetic tactics appear at the tops of
files in other contexts, we should consider an approach where
`Lean.Elab.Term.withReuseContext` uses something like `replaceRef` to
set the ref while disabling incrementality when the tactic does not
contain source position information.
Closes#4880
For experimentation by @the-sofi-uwu.
I also have an efficient number parser in LeanSAT that I am planning to
upstream after we have sufficiently bikeshed this change.
the internal constructions for structural and well-founded recursion
use plenty of `PProd` and `MProd`, and reading these, deeply
nested and in prefix notation, is unnecessarily troublesome.
Therefore this introduces notations
```
a ×ₚ b -- PProd a b
a ×ₘ b -- MProd a b
()ₚ -- PUnit.unit
(x,y,z)ₚ -- PProd.mk x (PProd.mk y z)
(x,y,z)ₘ -- MProd.mk x (MProd.mk y z)
```
(This is part 1, the rest will follow in #4730 after a stage0 update.)
Generalizes #3556 to not suppressing errors in tactic steps either when
the parse error is in a later step, as otherwise changes to the end of a
proof would affect (correctness or effectiveness of) incrementality of
preceding steps.
Fixes#4623, in combination with #4643
This implements the `termination_by structural` syntax proposed in
#3909.
I went with `termination_by structural` over, say,
`termination_by (config := {method := .structural})` mainly because it
was
easier to get going (otherwise I’d have to look into how to define
recursive
parsers, as `Parser.config` depends on `term` and `termination_by` is
part of
term. But also because I find it more ergonomic and aesthetic as a user.
But syntax can still change.
The `termination_by?` syntax will no longer force well-founded
recursion,
and instead the inferred `termination_by structurally` annotation will
be shown
if structural termination is possible.
While I was it, this fixes#4546 the easy way (log errors about but
otherwise
ignore incomplete `termination_by` sets for mutual recursion). Maybe we
get
multiple replacements (#4551), but even then this this good behavior.
Involves a bit of shuffling around `TerimationHints` (now validated for
a
clique already by `PreDefinition.main`) and `TerminationArguments` (now
lifted
out of the `WF` namespace, and a bit simplified).
Fixes#3909
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Kiss <him@richardkiss.com>
This appears to have been a semantic merge conflict between #3940 and
#4129. The effect on the language server is that if two edits are
sufficiently close in time to create an interrupt, some elaboration
steps like `simp` may accidentally catch the exception when it is
triggered during their execution, which makes incrementality assume that
elaboration of the body was successful, which can lead to incorrect
reuse, presenting the interrupted state to the user with symptoms such
as "uses sorry" without accompanying errors and incorrect lints.
When the type of an `example` is a proposition,
we should elaborate on them as we elaborate on theorems.
This is particularly important for examples that are often
used in educational material.
Recall that when elaborating theorem headers, we convert unassigned
universe metavariables into universe parameters. The motivation is
that the proof of a theorem should not influence its statement.
However, before this commit, this was not the case for examples when
their type was a proposition.
This discrepancy often confused users.
Additionally, we considered extending the above behavior to definitions
when
1- When their type is a proposition. However, it still caused disruption
in Mathlib.
2- When their type is provided. That is, we would keep the current
behavior only if `: <type>` was omitted. This would make the elaborator
for `def` much closer to the one for `theorem`, but it proved to be too
restrictive.
For example, the following instance in `Core.lean` would fail:
```
instance {α : Sort u} [Setoid α] : HasEquiv α :=
⟨Setoid.r⟩
```
and we would have to write instead:
```
instance {α : Sort u} [Setoid α] : HasEquiv.{u, 0} α :=
⟨Setoid.r⟩
```
There are other failures like this in the core, and we assume many more
in Mathlib.
closes#4398closes#4482 Remark: PR #4482 implements option 1 above. We may consider
it again in the future.
as #4527 describes there is inconsistency between `by`, `case` and
`next` on the one hand who, if the goal isn’t closed, put squiggly
underlines on the first line, and `.`, which so far only squiggled the
dot (which is a very short symbol!)
With this change the same mechanism as used by `case`, namely
`withCaseRef`, is also used for `.`.
There is an argument for the status quo: The `.` tactic is more commonly
used
with further tactics on the same line, and thus there is now a higher
risk that
the user might think that the first tactic is broken. But
* the same argument does apply to `by` and `case` where there was an
intentional
choice to do it this way
* consistency and
* a squiggly line just under the short `.` is easy to miss, so it is
actually
better to underlining more here (at least until we have a better way to
indicate incomplete proofs, which I have hopes for)
Fixes#4527, at least most of it.
This is the groundwork for a tactic index in generated documentation, as
there was in Lean 3. There are a few challenges to getting this to work
well in Lean 4:
* There's no natural notion of *tactic identity* - a tactic may be
specified by multiple syntax rules (e.g. the pattern-matching version of
`intro` is specified apart from the default version, but both are the
same from a user perspective)
* There's no natural notion of *tactic name* - here, we take the
pragmatic choice of using the first keyword atom in the tactic's syntax
specification, but this may need to be overridable someday.
* Tactics are extensible, but we don't want to allow arbitrary imports
to clobber existing tactic docstrings, which could become unpredictable
in practice.
For tactic identity, this PR introduces the notion of a *tactic
alternative*, which is a `syntax` specification that is really "the same
as" an existing tactic, but needs to be separate for technical reasons.
This provides a notion of tactic identity, which we can use as the basis
of a tactic index in generated documentation. Alternative forms of
tactics are specified using a new `@[tactic_alt IDENT]` attribute,
applied to the new tactic syntax. It is an error to declare a tactic
syntax rule to be an alternative of another one that is itself an
alternative. Documentation hovers now take alternatives into account,
and display the docs for the canonical name.
*Tactic tags*, created with the `register_tactic_tag` command, specify
tags that may be applied to tactics. This is intended to be used by
doc-gen and Verso. Tags may be applied using the `@[tactic_tag TAG1 TAG2
...]` attribute on a canonical tactic parser, which may be used in any
module to facilitate downstream projects introducing tags that apply to
pre-existing tactics. Tags may not be removed, but it's fine to
redundantly add them. The collection of tags, and the tactics to which
they're applied, can be seen using the `#print tactic tags` command.
*Extension documentation* provides a structured way to document
extensions to tactics. The resulting documentation is gathered into a
bulleted list at the bottom of the tactic's docstring. Extensions are
added using the `tactic_extension TAC` command. This can be used when
adding new interpretations of a tactic via `macro_rules`, when extending
some table or search index used by the tactic, or in any other way. It
is a command to facilitate its flexible use with various extension
mechanisms.
`Nat.succ_eq_add_one` and `Nat.pred_eq_sub_one` are now simp lemmas. For
theorems about `Nat.succ` or `Nat.pred` without corresponding theorem
for `+ 1` or `- 1`, this adds the corresponding theorem.
A pending tactic mvar managed to escape into an unexpected context in
specific circumstances.
```lean
example : True := by
· rw [show 0 = 0 by rfl]
```
* Term elaboration of the `show` creates a pending mvar for the `by rfl`
proof
* `rw` fails with an exception because the pattern does not occur in the
target
* `cdot` catches the exception and admits the goal
* `Term.runTactic` [synthesizes all pending mvars from the tactic's
execution](5f9dedfe5e/src/Lean/Elab/SyntheticMVars.lean (L350)),
including the `by rfl` proof. But this would not have happened without
`cdot` as the exception would have skipped that invocation!
* Now incrementality is confused because the nested `by rfl` proof is
unexpectedly run in the same context as the top-level proof, writing to
the wrong promise, and the error message is lost
Solution: disable incrementality for these pending mvars
As [reported on
Zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/maybe.20a.20cache.20bug.3F).
We expected that for sound reuse of elaboration results, it is
sufficient to compare the old and new syntax tree's structure and atoms
including position info, but not the whitespace in between them.
However, we have at least one request handler, the goal view, that
inspects the whitespace after a tactic and thus could return incorrect
results on reuse. For now we implement the straightforward fix of
checking the whitespace as well. Alternatives like updating the
whitespace stored in the reused info tree are tbd.
This has the slight disadvantage that adding whitespace at the end of a
tactic will re-execute it (or the entire body, but not the header, if
the body is not a tactic block), but only up to typing the first
character of the next tactic or command.
this is an amendment to #4177, after @kmill pointed out an issue:
Users might expect that within a tactic combinator like `first`, `simp
[h]` fails if `h` does not exist. Therefore the behavior introduced in
PR #4177, which is really most useful in mormal interactive use of
`skip`, is restricted to when `recover := true`.
The `save` happened in a slightly different context from the restore,
which a refinement of the `saveOrRestoreFull` signature now makes
impossible.
Fixes#4328
this fixes a usability paper cut that just annoyed me. When editing a
larger simp proof, I usually want to see the goal state after the simp,
and this is what I see while the `simp` command is complete. But then,
when I start typing, and necessarily type incomplete lemma names, that
error makes `simp` do nothing again and I see the original goal state.
In fact, if a prefix of the simp theorem name I am typing is a valid
identifier, it jumps even more around.
With this PR, using `logException`, I still get the red squiggly lines
for the unknown identifer, but `simp` just ignores that argument and
still shows me the final goal. Much nicer.
I also demoted the message for `[-foo]` when `foo` isn’t `simp` to a
warning and gave it the correct `ref`.
See it in action here: (in the middle, when you suddenly see the
terminal,
I am switching lean versions.)
https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/assets/148037/8cb3c563-1354-4c2d-bcee-26dfa1005ae0
Without this, it would not easy but perhaps be feasible to break
incrementality when editing command prefixes such as `set_option ... in
theorem` or also `theorem namesp.name ...` (which is a macro),
especially if at some later point we support incrementality in input
shifted by an edit. Explicit, sound support for these common cases will
be brought back soon.
Extends Lean's incremental reporting and reuse between commands into
various steps inside declarations:
* headers and bodies of each (mutual) definition/theorem
* `theorem ... := by` for each contained tactic step, including
recursively inside supported combinators currently consisting of
* `·` (cdot), `case`, `next`
* `induction`, `cases`
* macros such as `next` unfolding to the above
*Incremental reuse* means not recomputing any such steps if they are not
affected by a document change. *Incremental reporting* includes the
parts seen in the recording above: the progress bar and messages. Other
language server features such as hover etc. are *not yet* supported
incrementally, i.e. they are shown only when the declaration has been
fully processed as before.
---------
Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com>
this fixes#4078. It is an alternative fix to the one in #4137,
suggested
by @kmill.
Incidentially, it makes the unused variable linter better. My theory is
that
if we don’t reset the info when backtracking, the binder shows up more
than
once in the info tree, and then it is considered “used”, although there
are
just multiple binders.
