building upon #3714, this (almost) implements the second half of #3302.
The main effect is that we now get a better error message when `rfl`
fails. For
```lean
example : n+1+m = n + (1+m) := by rfl
```
instead of the wall of text
```
The rfl tactic failed. Possible reasons:
- The goal is not a reflexive relation (neither `=` nor a relation with a @[refl] lemma).
- The arguments of the relation are not equal.
Try using the reflexivity lemma for your relation explicitly, e.g. `exact Eq.refl _` or
`exact HEq.rfl` etc.
n m : Nat
⊢ n + 1 + m = n + (1 + m)
```
we now get
```
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, the left-hand side
n + 1 + m
is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side
n + (1 + m)
n m : Nat
⊢ n + 1 + m = n + (1 + m)
```
Unfortunately, because of very subtle differences in semantics (which
transparency setting is used when reducing the goal and whether the
“implicit lambda” feature applies) I could not make this simply the only
`rfl` implementation. So `rfl` remains a macro and is still expanded to
`eq_refl` (difference transparency setting) and `exact Iff.rfl` and
`exact HEq.rfl` (implicit lambda) to not break existing code. This can
be revised later, so this still closes: #3302.
A user might still be puzzled *why* to terms are not defeq. Explaining
that better (“reduced to… and reduces to… etc.”) would also be great,
but that’s not specific to `rfl`, so better left for some other time.
These theorems are useful when one wants to simplify the goal state,
under knowledge that the bitvector operations don't overflow. This can
produce much smaller goal states that eventually allows `bv_omega` to
quickly close the goal.
Note that the LHS of the theorem is *not* in `simp` normal form, since
e.g. `(x + y).toNat` is normalized to `(x.toNat + y.toNat) % 2^w`. It's
not immediately clear to me what should be done about this.
Co-authored-by: Kim Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com>
Previously, it was not possible to use `decide` with most Array
functions (including `==`).
Later, we may replace some of these functions with defeqs that go via
the `List` operations, and use `csimp` lemmas for fast runtime
behaviour. In the meantime, this allows using `decide`.
Given the derived `Repr` instance for types with parameters, the absence
of `Repr Empty` can cause `Repr` instance synthesis to fail. For
example, given
```lean
inductive Prim (special : Type) where
| plus
| other : special → Prim special
deriving Repr
```
this works:
```lean
#eval (Prim.plus : Prim Int)
```
but this fails:
```lean
#eval (Prim.plus : Prim Empty)
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Kyle Miller <kmill31415@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Eric Wieser <wieser.eric@gmail.com>
After #5270, `partial` functions that use products of sums no longer
compile with only `Nonempty` constraints on their arguments. These
instances allow the compilation to work.
In LNSym we often use the pattern `ofBool (a.getLsbD i)` to pick out a
specific bit (`i`) from a bitvector (`a`).
By adding a rewrite to `extractLsb` to `bv_decide`s normalization set,
we can still automatically close goals that have this pattern. In the
process, I also added a simp-lemma about the value of a `Fin 1`.
