This PR implements a helper simproc for `grind`. It is part of the
infrastructure used to cleanup denominators in `grind linarith`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Kim Morrison <kim@tqft.net>
This PR adds a `grind_annotated "YYYY-MM-DD"` command that marks files
as manually annotated for grind.
When LibrarySuggestions is called with `caller := "grind"` (as happens
with `grind +suggestions`), theorems from grind-annotated files are
filtered out from premise selection. The date argument validates using
Std.Time and is informational only for now, but could be used later to
detect files that need re-review.
There's no need for the library suggestions tools to suggest `grind`
theorems from files that have already been carefully annotated by hand.
This PR implements the `#grind_lint` command, a diagnostic tool for
analyzing the behavior of theorems annotated for theorem instantiation.
The command helps identify problematic theorems that produce excessive
or unbounded instance generation during E-matching, which can lead to
performance issues.
The main entry point is:
```
#grind_lint check
```
which analyzes all theorems marked with the `@[grind]` attribute.
For each theorem, it creates an artificial goal and runs `grind`,
collecting statistics about the number of instances produced.
Results are summarized using info messages, and detailed breakdowns are
shown for lemmas exceeding a configurable threshold.
Additional subcommands are provided for targeted inspection and control:
* `#grind_lint inspect thm`: analyzes one or more specific theorems in
detail
* `#grind_lint mute thm`: excludes a theorem from instantiation during
analysis
* `#grind_lint skip thm`: omits a theorem from being analyzed by
`#grind_lint check`
This PR adds infrastructure for the upcoming `grind` tactic mode, which
will be similar to the `conv` mode. The goal is to extend `grind` from a
terminal tactic into an interactive mode: `grind => …`.
It will serve as the foundation for `ungrind`, the process of converting
an expensive (and potentially fragile) `grind` proof into a robust
script. This mode will include tactics for expensive reasoning steps
such as cutsat model-based search, Gröbner basis computation,
E-matching, case splits, and more.
It will also provide robust, succinct references to facts and terms:
labels, structural matches, and anchors (e.g., `#abcd`).
This PR simplifies the `grind order` module, and internalizes the order
constraints. It removes the `Offset` type class because it introduced
too much complexity. We now cover the same use cases with a simpler
approach:
- Any type that implements at least `Std.IsPreorder`
- Arbitrary ordered rings.
- `Nat` by the `Nat.ToInt` adapter.
This PR tries to improve the E-matching pattern inference for `grind`.
That said, we still need better tools for annotating and maintaining
`grind` annotations in libraries.
closes#9125
This PR adjusts the experimental module system to make `private` the
default visibility modifier in `module`s, introducing `public` as a new
modifier instead. `public section` can be used to revert the default for
an entire section, though this is more intended to ease gradual adoption
of the new semantics such as in `Init` (and soon `Std`) where they
should be replaced by a future decl-by-decl re-review of visibilities.
This PR adds typeclasses for `grind` to embed types into `Int`, for
cutsat. This allows, for example, treating `Fin n`, or Mathlib's `ℕ+` in
a uniform and extensible way.
There is a primary typeclass that carries the `toInt` function, and a
description of the interval the type embeds in. There are then
individual typeclasses describing how arithmetic/order operations
interact with the embedding.
This PR uses `grind` to shorten some proofs in the LRAT checker. The
intention is not particularly to improve the quality or maintainability
of these proofs (although hopefully this is a side effect), but just to
give `grind` a work out.
There are a number of remaining notes, either about places where `grind`
fails with an internal error (for which #8608 is hopefully
representative, and we can fix after that), or `omega` works but `grind`
doesn't (to be investigated later).
Only in some of the files have I thoroughly used grind. In many files
I've just replaced leaves or branches of proofs with `grind` where it
worked easily, without setting up the internal annotations in the LRAT
library required to optimize the use of `grind`. It's diminishing
returns to do this in a proof library that is not high priority, so I've
simply drawn a line.
This PR adds `Lean.Grind.Ring.IsOrdered`, and cleans up the ring/module
grind API. These typeclasses are at present unused, but will support
future algorithmic improvements in `grind`.
This PR improves the failure message produced by the `grind` tactic. We
now include information about asserted facts, propositions that are
known to be true and false, and equivalence classes.
