This PR introduces ordered map data structures, namely `DTreeMap`,
`TreeMap`, `TreeSet` and their `.Raw` variants, into the standard
library. There are still some operations missing that the hash map has.
As of now, the operations are unverified, but the corresponding lemmas
will follow in subsequent PRs. While the tree map has already been
optimized, more micro-optimization will follow as soon as the new code
generator is ready.
---------
Co-authored-by: Paul Reichert <6992158+datokrat@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR adds completes the linear integer inequality normalizer for
`grind`. The missing normalization step replaces a linear inequality of
the form `a_1*x_1 + ... + a_n*x_n + b <= 0` with `a_1/k * x_1 + ... +
a_n/k * x_n + ceil(b/k) <= 0` where `k = gcd(a_1, ..., a_n)`.
`ceil(b/k)` is implemented using the helper `cdiv b k`.
This PR extend the preprocessing of well-founded recursive definitions
to bring assumptions like `h✝ : x ∈ xs` into scope automatically.
This fixes#5471, and follows (roughly) the design written there.
See the module docs at `src/Lean/Elab/PreDefinition/WF/AutoAttach.lean`
for details on the implementation.
This only works for higher-order functions that have a suitable setup.
See for example section “Well-founded recursion preprocessing setup” in
`src/Init/Data/List/Attach.lean`.
This does not change the `decreasing_tactic`, so in some cases there is
still the need for a manual termination proof some cases. We expect a
better termination tactic in the near future.
This PR implements basic support for handling of enum inductives in
`bv_decide`. It now supports equality on enum inductive variables (or
other uninterpreted atoms) and constants.
This PR adds `simp +arith` for integers. It uses the new `grind`
normalizer for linear integer arithmetic. We still need to implement
support for dividing the coefficients by their GCD. It also fixes
several bugs in the normalizer.
This PR implements the normalizer for linear integer arithmetic
expressions. It is not connect to `simp +arith` yet because of some
spurious `[simp]` attributes.
This PR avoids a `let` in the elaboration of `forIn`. It was introduced
in https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/commit/f51328ff112 but nothing
seems to break when I simplify the code. This removes an unexpected `let
col✝ :=…` from the “Expected type” view in the Info View and from the
termination proofs.
This PR adds the `Try.Config.merge` flag (`true` by default) to the
`try?` tactic. When set to `true`, `try?` compresses suggestions such
as:
```lean
· induction xs, ys using bla.induct
· grind only [List.length_reverse]
· grind only [bla]
```
into:
```lean
induction xs, ys using bla.induct <;> grind only [List.length_reverse, bla]
```
This PR also ensures `try?` does not generate suggestions that mixes
`grind` and `grind only`, or `simp` and `simp only` tactics.
This PR also adds the `try? +harder` option (previously called `lib`),
but it has not been fully implemented yet.
This PR adds new configuration options to `try?`.
- `try? -only` omits `simp only` and `grind only` suggestions
- `try? +missing` enables partial solutions where some subgoals are
"solved" using `sorry`, and must be manually proved by the user.
- `try? (max:=<num>)` sets the maximum number of suggestions produced
(default is 8).
This PR adds support for more complex suggestions in `try?`. Example:
```lean
example (as : List α) (a : α) : concat as a = as ++ [a] := by
try?
```
suggestion
```
Try this: · induction as, a using concat.induct
· rfl
· simp_all
```
This PR adds the `binderNameHint` gadget. It can be used in rewrite and
simp rules to preserve a user-provided name where possible.
The expression `binderNameHint v binder e` defined to be `e`.
If it is used on the right-hand side of an equation that is applied by a
tactic like `rw` or `simp`,
and `v` is a local variable, and `binder` is an expression that (after
beta-reduction) is a binder
(so `fun w => …` or `∀ w, …`), then it will rename `v` to the name used
in the binder, and remove
the `binderNameHint`.
A typical use of this gadget would be as follows; the gadget ensures
that after rewriting, the local
variable is still `name`, and not `x`:
```
theorem all_eq_not_any_not (l : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
l.all p = !l.any fun x => binderNameHint x p (!p x) := sorry
example (names : List String) : names.all (fun name => "Waldo".isPrefixOf name) = true := by
rw [all_eq_not_any_not]
-- ⊢ (!names.any fun name => !"Waldo".isPrefixOf name) = true
```
This gadget is supported by `simp`, `dsimp` and `rw` in the
right-hand-side of an equation, but not
in hypotheses or by other tactics.
This PR ensures `try?` can suggest tactics that need to reference
inaccessible local names.
Example:
```lean
/--
info: Try these:
• · expose_names; induction as, bs_1 using app.induct <;> grind [= app]
• · expose_names; induction as, bs_1 using app.induct <;> grind only [app]
-/
#guard_msgs (info) in
example : app (app as bs) cs = app as (app bs cs) := by
have bs := 20 -- shadows `bs` in the target
try?
```
This PR adds a convenience command `#info_trees in`, which prints the
info trees generated by the following command. It is useful for
debugging or learning about `InfoTree`.
This PR adds support for changing the binder annotations of existing
variables to and from strict-implicit and instance-implicit using the
`variable` command.
This PR requires a stage0 update to fully take effect.
Closes#6078
This PR starts on the process of cleaning up variable names across
List/Array/Vector. For now, we just rename "numerical index" variables
in one file. This is driven by a custom linter.
This PR adds SMT-LIB operators to detect overflow
`BitVec.(uadd_overflow, sadd_overflow)`, according to the definitions
[here](https://github.com/SMT-LIB/SMT-LIB-2/blob/2.7/Theories/FixedSizeBitVectors.smt2),
and the theorems proving equivalence of such definitions with the
`BitVec` library functions (`uaddOverflow_eq`, `saddOverflow_eq`).
Support theorems for these proofs are `BitVec.toNat_mod_cancel_of_lt,
BitVec.toInt_lt, BitVec.le_toInt, Int.bmod_neg_iff`. The PR also
includes a set of tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Tobias Grosser <github@grosser.es>
Co-authored-by: Alex Keizer <alex@keizer.dev>
Co-authored-by: Tobias Grosser <tobias@grosser.es>
Co-authored-by: Siddharth Bhat <siddu.druid@gmail.com>
This PR adds error messages for `inductive` declarations with
conflicting constructor names and `mutual` declarations with conflicting
names.
Closes#6694.
This includes the examples from issues #2961, #3219 and #5667 in our
test suite, so that we know when (accidentially) fix them.
In fact this closes#3219, which (judging from the nightlies) was fixed
last week by #6901.
This PR adds preliminary support for inlay hints, as well as support for
inlay hints that denote the auto-implicits of a function. Hovering over
an auto-implicit displays its type and double-clicking the auto-implicit
inserts it into the text document.
This PR is an extension of #3910.
### Known issues
- In VS Code, when inserting an inlay hint, the inlay hint may linger
for a couple of seconds before it disappears. This is a defect of the VS
Code implementation of inlay hints and cannot adequately be resolved by
us.
- When making a change to the document, it may take a couple of seconds
until the inlay hints respond to the change. This is deliberate and
intended to reduce the amount of inlay hint flickering while typing. VS
Code has a mechanism of its own for this, but in my experience it is
still far too sensitive without additional latency.
- Inserting an auto-implicit inlay hint that depends on an auto-implicit
meta-variable causes a "failed to infer binder type" error. We can't
display these meta-variables in the inlay hint because they don't have a
user-displayable name, so it is not clear how to resolve this problem.
- Inlay hints are currently always resolved eagerly, i.e. we do not
support the `textDocument/inlayHint/resolve` request yet. Implementing
support for this request is future work.
### Other changes
- Axioms did not support auto-implicits due to an oversight in the
implementation. This PR ensures they do.
- In order to reduce the amount of inlay hint flickering when making a
change to the document, the language server serves old inlay hints for
parts of the file that have not been processed yet. This requires LSP
request handler state (that sometimes must be invalidated on
`textDocument/didChange`), so this PR introduces the notion of a
stateful LSP request handler.
- The partial response mechanism that we use for semantic tokens, where
we simulate incremental LSP responses by periodically emitting refresh
requests to the client, is generalized to accommodate both inlay hints
and semantic tokens. Additionally, it is made more robust to ensure that
we never emit refresh requests while a corresponding request is in
flight, which causes VS Code to discard the respond of the request, as
well as to ensure that we keep prompting VS Code to send another request
if it spuriously decides not to respond to one of our refresh requests.
- The synthetic identifier of an `example` had the full declaration as
its (non-canonical synthetic) range. Since we need a reasonable position
for the identifier to insert an inlay hint for the auto-implicits of an
`example`, we change the (canonical synthetic) range of the synthetic
identifier to that of the `example` keyword.
- The semantic highlighting request handling is moved to a separate
file.
### Breaking changes
- The semantic highlighting request handler is not a pure request
handler anymore, but a stateful one. Notably, this means that clients
that extend the semantic highlighting of the Lean language server with
the `chainLspRequestHandler` function must now use the
`chainStatefulLspRequestHandler` function instead.
This PR modifies `rewrite`/`rw` to abort rewriting if the elaborated
lemma has any immediate elaboration errors (detected by presence of
synthetic sorries). Rewriting still proceeds if there are elaboration
issues arising from pending synthetic metavariables, like instance
synthesis failures. The purpose of the change is to avoid obscure
"tactic 'rewrite' failed, equality or iff proof expected ?m.5" errors
when for example a lemma does not exist.
This helps error reporting for the natural number game.
https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/113489-new-members/topic/Why.20doesn't.20add_left_comm.20work.20here.3F/near/497060022
This PR fixes the `#discr_tree_simp_key` command, because it displays
the keys for just `lhs` in `lhs ≠ rhs`, but it should be `lhs = rhs`,
since that is what simp indexes.
