This PR changes the interface of the `ForIn`, `ForIn'`, and `ForM`
typeclasses to not take a `Monad m` parameter. This is a breaking change
for most downstream `instance`s, which will will now need to assume
`[Monad m]`.
The rationale is that if the provider of an instance requires `m` to be
a Monad, they should assume this up front. This makes it possible for
the instanve to assume `LawfulMonad m` or some other stronger
requirement, and also to provided a concrete instance for a particular
`m` without assuming a non-canonical `Monad` structure on it.
Zulip: [#lean4 > Monad assumptions in fields of other typeclasses @
💬](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/270676-lean4/topic/Monad.20assumptions.20in.20fields.20of.20other.20typeclasses/near/537102158)
This PR avoids a `let` in the elaboration of `forIn`. It was introduced
in https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/commit/f51328ff112 but nothing
seems to break when I simplify the code. This removes an unexpected `let
col✝ :=…` from the “Expected type” view in the Info View and from the
termination proofs.
