This PR makes functions defined by well-founded recursion use an
`opaque` well-founded proof by default. This reliably prevents kernel
reduction of such definitions and proofs, which tends to be
prohibitively slow (fixes#2171), and which regularly causes
hard-to-debug kernel type-checking failures. This changes renders
`unseal` ineffective for such definitions. To avoid the opaque proof,
annotate the function definition with `@[semireducible]`.
This PR makes `simp` able to simplify basic `for` loops in monads other
than `Id`.
This is some prework for #7352, where the `Id` lemmas will be
deprecated.
This PR allows the use of `dsimp` during preprocessing of well-founded
definitions. This fixes regressions when using `if-then-else` without
giving a name to the condition, but where the condition is needed for
the termination proof, in cases where that subexpression is reachable
only by dsimp, but not by simp (e.g. inside a dependent let)
Also fixes some preprocessing lemmas to not be bad simp lemmas (with
lambdas on the LHS, due to dot notation and unfortunate argument order)
This fixes#7408.
This PR takes Array-specific lemmas at the end of `Array/Lemmas.lean`
(i.e. material that does not have exact correspondences with
`List/Lemmas.lean`) and moves them to more appropriate homes. More to
come.
This PR adds `Array.replace` and `Vector.replace`, proves the
correspondences with `List.replace`, and reproduces the basic API. In
order to do so, it fills in some gaps in the `List.findX` APIs.
This PR splits `Int.DivModLemmas` into a `Bootstrap` and `Lemmas` file,
where it is possible to use `omega` in `Lemmas`.
I'm going to add more theory, particularly about `fdiv` and `tdiv` to
the `Lemmas` file, and would prefer to have access to `omega`.
This PR moves away from using `List.get` / `List.get?` / `List.get!` and
`Array.get!`, in favour of using the `GetElem` mediated getters. In
particular it deprecates `List.get?`, `List.get!` and `Array.get?`. Also
adds `Array.back`, taking a proof, matching `List.getLast`.
This PR extend the preprocessing of well-founded recursive definitions
to bring assumptions like `h✝ : x ∈ xs` into scope automatically.
This fixes#5471, and follows (roughly) the design written there.
See the module docs at `src/Lean/Elab/PreDefinition/WF/AutoAttach.lean`
for details on the implementation.
This only works for higher-order functions that have a suitable setup.
See for example section “Well-founded recursion preprocessing setup” in
`src/Init/Data/List/Attach.lean`.
This does not change the `decreasing_tactic`, so in some cases there is
still the need for a manual termination proof some cases. We expect a
better termination tactic in the near future.
This PR adds `LawfulBEq` instances for `Array` and `Vector`.
(Note this replaces a contribution of @mehbark to Batteries for the
LawfulBEq instance for Vector, which was dropped during the release
process due to conflicts. Thanks for that contribution!)
This PR aligns current coverage of `find`-type theorems across
`List`/`Array`/`Vector`. There are still quite a few holes in this API,
which will be filled later.
This PR completes the alignment of lemmas about monadic functions on
`List/Array/Vector`. Amongst other changes, we change the simp normal
form from `List.forM` to `ForM.forM`, and correct the definition of
`List.flatMapM`, which previously was returning results in the incorrect
order. There remain many gaps in the verification lemmas for monadic
functions; this PR only makes the lemmas uniform across
`List/Array/Vector`.
This PR adds lemmas relating the operations on
findIdx?/findFinIdx?/idxOf?/findIdxOf?/eraseP/erase on List and on
Array. It's preliminary to aligning the verification lemmas for
`find...` and `erase...`.
This PR makes `take`/`drop`/`extract` available for each of
`List`/`Array`/`Vector`. The simp normal forms differ, however: in
`List`, we simplify `extract` to `take+drop`, while in `Array` and
`Vector` we simplify `take` and `drop` to `extract`. We also provide
`Array/Vector.shrink`, which simplifies to `take`, but is implemented by
repeatedly popping. Verification lemmas for `Array/Vector.extract` to
follow in a subsequent PR.
This PR makes the signatures of `find` functions across
`List`/`Array`/`Vector` consistent. Verification lemmas will follow in
subsequent PRs.
We were previously quite inconsistent about the signature of
`indexOf`/`findIdx` functions across `List` and `Array`. Moreover, there
are still quite large gaps in the verification lemma coverage for these
even at the `List` level.
My intention is to make the signatures consistent by providing:
`findIdx` / `findIdx?` / `findFinIdx?` (these all take a predicate, and
return respectively a `Nat`, `Option Nat`, `Option (Fin l.length)`) and
similarly `idxOf` / `idxOf?` / `finIdxOf?` (which look for an element)
for each of List/Array/Vector. I've seen enough examples by now where
each variant is genuinely the most convenient at the call-site, so I'm
going to accept the cost of having many closely related functions.
*Hopefully* for the verification lemmas we can simp all of these into
"projections" of the `Option (Fin l.length)` versions, and then only
have to specify that.
However, I will not plan on immediately either filling in the missing
verification lemmas (or even deciding what the simp normal forms
relating these operations are), and just reach parity amongst
List/Array/Vector for what is already there.
