This PR fixes a bug introduced in #7830 where if the cursor is at the
indicated position
```lean
example (as bs : List Nat) : (as.append bs).length = as.length + bs.length := by
induction as with
| nil => -- cursor
| cons b bs ih =>
```
then the Infoview would show "no goals" rather than the `nil` goal. The
PR also fixes a separate bug where placing the cursor on the next line
after the `induction`/`cases` tactics like in
```lean
induction as with
| nil => sorry
| cons b bs ih => sorry
I -- < cursor
```
would report the original goal in the goal list. Furthermore, there are
numerous improvements to error recovery (including `allGoals`-type logic
for pre-tactics) and the visible tactic states when there are errors.
Adds `Tactic.throwOrLogErrorAt`/`Tactic.throwOrLogError` for throwing or
logging errors depending on the recovery state.
This PR updates the formatting of, and adds explanations for, "unknown
identifier" errors as well as "failed to infer type" errors for binders
and definitions.
It attempts to ameliorate some of the confusion encountered in #1592 by
modifying the wording of the "header is elaborated before body is
processed" note and adding further discussion and examples of this
behavior in the corresponding error explanation.
This PR adds explanations for a few errors concerning noncomputability,
redundant match alternatives, and invalid inductive declarations.
These adopt a lower-case error naming style, which is also applied to
existing error explanation tests.
This PR improves the error messages produced by invalid pattern-match
alternatives and improves parity in error placement between
pattern-matching tactics and elaborators.
Closes#7170
This PR lets `induction` accept eliminator where the motive application
in the conclusion has complex arguments; these are abstracted over using
`kabstract` if possible. This feature will go well with unfolding
induction principles (#8088).
Extends Lean's incremental reporting and reuse between commands into
various steps inside declarations:
* headers and bodies of each (mutual) definition/theorem
* `theorem ... := by` for each contained tactic step, including
recursively inside supported combinators currently consisting of
* `·` (cdot), `case`, `next`
* `induction`, `cases`
* macros such as `next` unfolding to the above
*Incremental reuse* means not recomputing any such steps if they are not
affected by a document change. *Incremental reporting* includes the
parts seen in the recording above: the progress bar and messages. Other
language server features such as hover etc. are *not yet* supported
incrementally, i.e. they are shown only when the declaration has been
fully processed as before.
---------
Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com>
Sets the default value to `pp.fieldNotation.generalized` to `true`.
Updates tests, and fixes some minor flaws in the implementation of the
generalized field notation pretty printer.
Now generalized field notation won't be used for any function that has a
`motive` argument. This is intended to prevent recursors from pretty
printing using it as (1) recursors are more like control flow structures
than actual functions and (2) generalized field notation tends to cause
elaboration problems for recursors.
Note: be sure functions that have an `@[app_unexpander]` use
`@[pp_nodot]` if applicable. For example, `List.toArray` needs
`@[pp_nodot]` to ensure the unexpander prints it using `#[...]`
notation.
Replaces `@[eliminator]` with two attributes `@[induction_eliminator]`
and `@[cases_eliminator]` for defining custom eliminators for the
`induction` and `cases` tactics, respectively.
Adds `Nat.recAux` and `Nat.casesAuxOn`, which are eliminators that are
defeq to `Nat.rec` and `Nat.casesOn`, but these use `0` and `n + 1`
rather than `Nat.zero` and `Nat.succ n`.
For example, using `induction` to prove that the factorial function is
positive now has the following goal states (thanks also to #3616 for the
goal state after unfolding).
```lean
example : 0 < fact x := by
induction x with
| zero => decide
| succ x ih =>
/-
x : Nat
ih : 0 < fact x
⊢ 0 < fact (x + 1)
-/
unfold fact
/-
...
⊢ 0 < (x + 1) * fact x
-/
simpa using ih
```
Thanks to @adamtopaz for initial work on splitting the `@[eliminator]`
attribute.
right now, the `induction` tactic accepts a custom eliminator using the
`using <ident>` syntax, but is restricted to identifiers. This
limitation becomes annoying when the elminator has explicit parameters
that are not targets, and the user (naturally) wants to be able to write
```
induction a, b, c using foo (x := …)
```
This generalizes the syntax to expressions and changes the code
accordingly.
This can be used to instantiate a multi-motive induction:
```
example (a : A) : True := by
induction a using A.rec (motive_2 := fun b => True)
case mkA b IH => exact trivial
case A => exact trivial
case mkB b IH => exact trivial
```
For this to work the term elaborator learned the `heedElabAsElim` flag,
`true` by default. But in the default setting, `A.rec (motive_2 := fun b
=> True)`
would fail to elaborate, because there is no expected type. So the
induction
tactic will elaborate in a mode where that attribute is simply ignored.
As a side effect, the “failed to infer implicit target” error message
is improved and prints the name of the implicit target that could not be
instantiated.
