Where before we had
```lean
#check fun x : Nat => ?a
-- fun x ↦ ?m.7 x : (x : Nat) → ?m.6 x
```
Now by default we have
```lean
#check fun x : Nat => ?a
-- fun x => ?a : (x : Nat) → ?m.6 x
```
In particular, delayed assignment metavariables such as `?m.7` pretty
print using the name of the metavariable they are delayed assigned to,
suppressing the bound variables used in the delayed assignment (hence
`?a` rather than `?a x`). Hovering over `?a` shows `?m.7 x`.
The benefit is that users can see the user-provided name in local
contexts. A justification for this pretty printing choice is that `?m.7
x` is supposed to stand for `?a`, and furthermore it is just as opaque
to assignment in defeq as `?a` is (however, when synthetic opaque
metavariables are made assignable, delayed assignments can be a little
less assignable than true synthetic opaque metavariables).
The original pretty printing behavior can be recovered using `set_option
pp.mvars.delayed true`.
This PR also extends the documentation for holes and synthetic holes,
with some technical details about what delayed assignments are. This
likely should be moved to the reference manual, but for now it is
included in this docstring.
(This PR is a simplified version of #3494, which has a round-trippable
notation for delayed assignments. The pretty printing in this PR is
unlikely to round trip, but it is better than the current situation,
which is that delayed assignment metavariables never round trip, and
plus it does not require introducing a new notation.)
The app unexpanders for `Name.mkStr1` through `Name.mkStr8` weren't
respecting the escaping rules for names. For example, ``#check `«a.b»``
would show `` `a.b``.
This PR folds the unexpanders into the name literal delaborator, where
escaping is already handled.
The `#guard_msgs` command runs the command it is attached to as if it
were a top-level command. This is because the top-level command
elaborator runs linters, and we are interested in capturing linter
warnings using `#guard_msgs`. However, the linters will run on
`#guard_msgs` itself, leading sometimes to duplicate warnings (like for
the unused variable linter).
Rather than special-casing `#guard_msgs` in every affected linter, this
PR special-cases it in the top-level command elaborator itself. **Now
linters are only run if the command doesn't contain `#guard_msgs`.**
This way, the linters are only run on the sub-command that `#guard_msgs`
runs itself. This rule also keeps linters from running multiple times in
cases such as `set_option pp.mvars false in /-- ... -/ #guard_msgs in
...`.
... while at it also call `trivial` to close goals that can be trivially
closed.
---------
Co-authored-by: Siddharth <siddu.druid@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Henrik Böving <hargonix@gmail.com>
when the transparency mode is `.all`, then one expects `getFunInfo` and
`inferType` to also work with that transparency mode.
Fixes#5562Fixes#2975Fixes#2194
I think the overhead (runtime/later proving) of using `for` is paid off
by being able to short-circuit.
These functions are needed downstream to switch over the Std.HashSet.
ac_nf is a counterpart to ac_rfl, which normalizes bitvector expressions
with respect to associativity and commutativity.
While there, also add test coverage for ac_rfl and ac_nf for BitVec,
complementing the existing test coverage.
Macros sometimes create auxiliary types and instances about them, and
they rely on the instance name generate to create unique names in that
case.
This modifies the automatic name generator to add a fresh macro scope to
the generated name if any of the constants in the type of the instance
themselves have macro scopes.
Closes#2044
after this change, `simp` will be able to discharge side-goals that,
after simplification, are of the form `∀ …, a = b` with `a =?= b`.
Usually these side-goals are solved by simplification using `eq_self`,
but that does not work when there are metavariables involved.
This enables us to have rewrite rules like
```
theorem List.foldl_subtype (p : α → Prop) (l : List (Subtype p)) (f : β → Subtype p → β)
(g : β → α → β) (b : β)
(hf : ∀ b x h, f b ⟨x, h⟩ = g b x) :
l.foldl f b = (l.map (·.val)).foldl g b := by
```
where the parameter `g` does not appear on the lhs, but can be solved
for using the `hf` equation. See `tests/lean/run/simpHigherOrder.lean`
for more examples.
The motivating use-case is that `simp` should be able to clean up the
usual
```
l.attach.map (fun <x, _> => x)
```
idiom often seen in well-founded recursive functions with nested
recursion.
Care needs to be taken with adding such rules to the default simp set if
the lhs is very general, and thus causes them to be tried everywhere.
Performance impact of just this PR (no additional simp rules) on mathlib
is unsuspicious:
http://speed.lean-fro.org/mathlib4/compare/b5bc44c7-e53c-4b6c-9184-bbfea54c4f80/to/ae1d769b-2ff2-4894-940c-042d5a698353
I tried a few alternatives, e.g. letting `simp` apply `eq_self` without
bumping the mvar depth, or just solve equalities directly, but that
broke too much things, and adding code to the default discharger seemed
simpler.
The formatter was using `tk ++ " "` to separate tokens from tokens they
would merge with, but `" "` is not whitespace that could merge. This
affected large binder lists, which wouldn't pretty print with any line
breaks. Now they can be flowed across multiple lines.
Closes#5424
Just an `Array` version of `List.eraseReps`. These functions are for now
outside of scope for verification, so there's just a simple `example` in
the tests.
Now the elab-as-elim procedure allows eliminators whose result is an
arbitrary application of the motive. For example, the following is now
accepted. It will generalize `Int.natAbs _` from the expected type.
```lean
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem natAbs_elim {motive : Nat → Prop} (i : Int)
(hpos : ∀ (n : Nat), i = n → motive n)
(hneg : ∀ (n : Nat), i = -↑n → motive n) :
motive (Int.natAbs i) := by sorry
```
This change simplifies the elaborator, since it no longer needs to keep
track of discriminants (which can easily be read off from the return
type of the eliminator) or the difference between "targets" and "extra
arguments" (which are now both "major arguments" that should be eagerly
elaborated).
Closes#4086
Recall that currently named arguments suppress all explicit parameters
that are dependencies. This PR limits this feature to only apply to true
structure projections, except in the case where it is triggered when
there are no more positional arguments. This preserves the primary
reason for generalizing this feature (issue #1851), while removing the
generalized feature, which has led to numerous confusions (issue #1867).
This also fixes a bug pointed out [on
Zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/270676-lean4/topic/.40foo.20.28A.20.3A.3D.20bar.29.20_.20_/near/468564862)
where in `@` mode, instance implicit parameter dependencies to named
arguments would be suppressed unless the next positional argument was
`_`.
More detail:
* The `NamedArg` structure now has a `suppressDeps : Bool` field. It is
set to `true` for the `self` argument in structure projections. If there
is such a `NamedArg`, explicit parameters that are dependencies to the
named argument are turned into implicit arguments. The consequence is
that *all* structure projections are treated as if their type parameters
are implicit, even for class projections. This flag is *not* used for
generalized field notation.
* We preserve the suppression feature when there are no positional
arguments remaining. This feature pre-dates the fix to issue #1851, and
it is useful when combining named arguments and the eta expansion
feature, since dependencies of named arguments cannot be turned into eta
arguments. Plus, there are examples of the form `rw [lem (h := foo)]`
where `lem` has explicit arguments that `h` depends on.
* For instance implicit parameters in explicit mode, now `_` arguments
register terminfo and are hoverable.
* Now `..` is respected in explicit mode.
This implements RFC #5397. The `suppressDeps` flag suggests a future
possibility of a named argument syntax that can suppress dependencies.
Adds a mechanism where when an autoparam tactic fails to synthesize a
parameter, the associated parameter name or field name for the autoparam
is reported in an error.
Examples:
```text
could not synthesize default value for parameter 'h' using tactics
could not synthesize default value for field 'inv' of 'S' using tactics
```
Notes:
* Autoparams now run their tactics without any error recovery or
error-to-sorry enabled. This enables catching the error and reporting
the contextual information. This is justified on the grounds that
autoparams are not interactive.
* Autoparams for applications now cleanup the autoParam annotation,
bringing it in line with autoparams for structure fields.
* This preserves the old behavior that autoparams leave terminfo, but we
will revisit this after some imminent improvements to the unused
variable linter.
Closes#2950
`elabEvalUnsafe` already does something similar: it also instantiates
universe metavariables, but it is not clear to me whether that is
sensible here.
To be conservative, I leave it out of this PR.
See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3090#discussion_r1432007590
for a comparison between `#eval` and `Meta.evalExpr`. This PR is not
trying to fully align them, but just to fix one particular misalignment
that I am impacted by.
Closes#3091
building upon #3714, this (almost) implements the second half of #3302.
The main effect is that we now get a better error message when `rfl`
fails. For
```lean
example : n+1+m = n + (1+m) := by rfl
```
instead of the wall of text
```
The rfl tactic failed. Possible reasons:
- The goal is not a reflexive relation (neither `=` nor a relation with a @[refl] lemma).
- The arguments of the relation are not equal.
Try using the reflexivity lemma for your relation explicitly, e.g. `exact Eq.refl _` or
`exact HEq.rfl` etc.
n m : Nat
⊢ n + 1 + m = n + (1 + m)
```
we now get
```
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, the left-hand side
n + 1 + m
is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side
n + (1 + m)
n m : Nat
⊢ n + 1 + m = n + (1 + m)
```
Unfortunately, because of very subtle differences in semantics (which
transparency setting is used when reducing the goal and whether the
“implicit lambda” feature applies) I could not make this simply the only
`rfl` implementation. So `rfl` remains a macro and is still expanded to
`eq_refl` (difference transparency setting) and `exact Iff.rfl` and
`exact HEq.rfl` (implicit lambda) to not break existing code. This can
be revised later, so this still closes: #3302.
A user might still be puzzled *why* to terms are not defeq. Explaining
that better (“reduced to… and reduces to… etc.”) would also be great,
but that’s not specific to `rfl`, so better left for some other time.
Previously the formatter was using the builtin token table rather that
the one in the current environment. This could lead to round-tripping
failures for user-defined notations.
For an illustrative example, given the following notation
```lean
infixl:65 "+'" => Int.add
notation:65 a:65 "+'-" b:66 => Int.add a (id b)
```
then `5 +' -1` would parse as `Int.add 5 (-1)` and incorrectly pretty
print as `5+'-1`, which in turn would parse as `Int.add 5 (id 1)`. Now
it pretty prints as `5+' -1`.
Modifies how the declaration command elaborator reports when there are
unassigned metavariables. The visible effects are that (1) now errors
like "don't know how to synthesize implicit argument" and "failed to
infer 'let' declaration type" take precedence over universe level
issues, (2) universe level metavariables are reported as metavariables
(rather than as `u_1`, `u_2`, etc.), and (3) if the universe level
metavariables appear in `let` binding types or `fun` binder types, the
error is localized there.
Motivation: Reporting unsolved expression metavariables is more
important than universe level issues (typically universe issues are from
unsolved expression metavariables). Furthermore, `let` and `fun` binders
can't introduce universe polymorphism, so we can "blame" such bindings
for universe metavariables, if possible.
Example 1: Now the errors are on `x` and `none` (reporting expression
metavariables) rather than on `example` (which reported universe level
metavariables).
```lean
example : IO Unit := do
let x := none
pure ()
```
Example 2: Now there is a "failed to infer universe levels in 'let'
declaration type" error on `PUnit`.
```lean
def foo : IO Unit := do
let x : PUnit := PUnit.unit
pure ()
```
In more detail:
* `elabMutualDef` used to turn all level mvars into fresh level
parameters before doing an analysis for "hidden levels". This analysis
turns out to be exactly the same as instead creating fresh parameters
for level mvars in only pre-definitions' types and then looking for
level metavariables in their bodies. With this PR, error messages refer
to the same level metavariables in the Infoview, rather than obscure
generated `u_1`, `u_2`, ... level parameters.
* This PR made it possible to push the "hidden levels" check into
`addPreDefinitions`, after the checks for unassigned expression mvars.
It used to be that if the "hidden levels" check produced an "invalid
occurrence of universe level" error it would suppress errors for
unassigned expression mvars, and now it is the other way around.
* There is now a list of `LevelMVarErrorInfo` objects in the `TermElabM`
state. These record expressions that should receive a localized error if
they still contain level metavariables. Currently `let` expressions and
binder types in general register such info. Error messages make use of a
new `exposeLevelMVars` function that adds pretty printer annotations
that try to expose all universe level metavariables.
* When there are universe level metavariables, for error recovery the
definition is still added to the environment after assigning each
metavariable to level 0.
* There's a new `Lean.Util.CollectLevelMVars` module for collecting
level metavariables from expressions.
Closes#2058
Resolve cases when the `To/FromJSON` type classes are used with `Empty`,
e.g. in the following motivating example.
```
import Lean
structure Foo (α : Type) where
y : Option α
deriving Lean.ToJson
#eval Lean.toJson (⟨none⟩ : Foo Empty) -- fails
```
This is a follow-up to this PR
https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5415, as suggested by
@eric-wieser. It expands on the original suggestion by also handling
`FromJSON`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Kyle Miller <kmill31415@gmail.com>
