@kha I'm trying to improve the equation compiler. I have added a
preprocessing step, and got the following wierd output when testing
tests/lean/interactive/info_goal.lean
```
> {"record":{"doc":"This tactic applies to any goal. It gives directly the exact proof\nterm of the goal. Let `T` be our goal, let `p` be a term of type `U` then\n`exact p` succeeds iff `T` and `U` are definitionally equal.","source":,"state":"⊢ ℕ → ℕ","tactic_params":["<error while executing interactive.param_desc: don't know how to pretty print lean.parser.pexpr 2>"],"text":"exact","type":"interactive.parse interactive.types.texpr → tactic unit"},"response":"ok","seq_num":4}
```
The problem seems to be the pattern
`(parser.pexpr)
which is sugar for
`(parser.pexpr std.prec.max)
and will not match `(pexpr 2)`
So, I fixed it by replacing the pattern with `(parser.pexpr %%v).
However, it is not clear to me why it was working before.
Any ideas?
To make the equation compiler more convenient to use, we will add a
couple of preprocessing steps.
This commit adds the first one of them. In this step, we use
type inference to refine pattern variables, and we relax the
restrictions on inaccessible annotations.
We will also add a preprocessing step that implements the "complete
transition" step before we execute the elim_match step.
Reason: vector in in init folder was introducing an overload (`::`) for
all Lean users. The workaround (use `local infix ::`) was
counterintuitive.
We currently have no special support for bitvectors in the code
generator. Thus, there is no need to have vector and bitvec in the init
folder right now. Moreover, the new parser and elaborator (issue #1674) should
provide better ways of managing overloaded symbols.
This gives a workaround for the situation where the `congr` tactic does too much congruence applications, such as reducing `|- a + b = b + a` to `|- a = b` and `|- b = a`, by supplying the desired equalities to stop at using `have`.
Now tactics supporting locations can also specify the goal among the locations by using the name `⊢` or `|-`. Also `rw at *` is implemented so that it will rewrite any hypotheses or the goal for which the whole sequence of rewrites succeeds. (This is different from `rw at h1 h2 ... hn |-`, which requires that all rewrites run to completion on each specified target.)
@digama0 I moved bitvec back to the main repo, and many nat lemmas.
I want these lemmas here for now. I will need some of them for future
decision procedures.
and all/any_goals. This occurs when solving the first subgoal generated by `tac1; tac2` closes the second goal as well, before the second `tac2` invocation is run. Reported by @jldodds on gitter.
This way people can search for "constant quot" and find it in the lean source. Plus the init_quotient command only occurs once, so this way people know what it means.
