This PR enables the elaboration of theorem bodies, i.e. proofs, to
happen in parallel to each other as well as to other elaboration tasks.
Specifically, to be eligible for parallel proof elaboration,
* the theorem must not be in a `mutual` block
* `deprecated.oldSectionVars` must not be set
* `Elab.async` must be set (currently defaults to `true` in the language
server, `false` on the cmdline)
To be activated for downstream projects (i.e. in stage 1) pending
further Mathlib validation.
New behavior: when in recovery mode, if any tactic fails in `all_goals`
then the metacontext is restored and all goals are admitted.
Without this, it can leave partially-solved metavariables and incomplete
goal lists.
Many of our tests in `tests/lean/run/` produce output from `#eval` (or
`#check`) statements, that is then ignored.
This PR tries to capture all the useful output using `#guard_msgs`. I've
only done a cursory check that the output is still sane --- there is a
chance that some "unchecked" tests have already accumulated regressions
and this just cements them!
In the other direction, I did identify two rotten tests:
* a minor one in `setStructInstNotation.lean`, where a comment says `Set
Nat`, but `#check` actually prints `?_`. Weird?
* `CompilerProbe.lean` is generating empty output, apparently indicating
that something is broken, but I don't know the signficance of this file.
In any case, I'll ask about these elsewhere.
(This started by noticing that a recent `grind` test file had an
untested `trace_state`, and then got carried away.)
@Kha It has a few advantages over `<or>` (`<|>`).
- It is not an infix operator.
- It takes tactic sequences instead of tactics as arguments
For example, we can write
```
first
| apply h1; assumption
| exact y; exact h3; assumption
```
or
```
first apply h1; assumption | exact y; exact h3; assumption
```
instead of
```
(apply h1; assumption) <|> (exact y; exact h3; assumption)
```
