Remarks:
- Some tests do not produce error messages anymore because they can be
processed using the new equation compiler preprocessor.
- Some error messages got worse because of the preprocessing step.
We use metavariables in the preprocessing step. This information
may "leak" to users. Another problem is that some variable names
are lost. Example: in the following definition
def to_nat : ∀ {n}, fi n → nat
| (succ n) f0 := 0
| (succ n) (fs i) := succ (to_nat i)
The preprocessing step uses metavariables for pattern variables.
Thus, we have
def to_nat : ∀ {n}, fi n → nat
| (succ ?n) (@f0 ?x) := 0
| (succ ?n) (@fs ?x ?i) := succ (to_nat i)
when solving the constraint `succ ?n =?= succ ?x`, Lean assigns
?n := ?x
after solving these constraints, the preprocessor converts
metavariables into pattern variables again, and we have
def to_nat : ∀ {n}, fi n → nat
| (succ x) (@f0 x) := 0
| (succ x) (@fs x i) := succ (to_nat i)
So, we get the following equation lemmas:
to_nat.equations._eqn_1 : ∀ (x : ℕ), @to_nat (succ x) (@f0 x) = 0
to_nat.equations._eqn_2 : ∀ (x : ℕ) (i : fi x), @to_nat (succ x) (@fs x i) = succ (@to_nat x i)
instead of
to_nat.equations._eqn_1 : ∀ (n : ℕ), @to_nat (succ n) (@f0 n) = 0
to_nat.equations._eqn_2 : ∀ (n : ℕ) (i : fi n), @to_nat (succ n) (@fs n i) = succ (@to_nat n i)
@johoelzl We now produce a better message for your example:
inductive R : ℕ → Prop
| pos : ∀p n, R (p + n)
lemma R_id : ∀n, R n → R n
| (.p + .n) (R.pos p n) := R.pos p n
The new error is:
file.lean:5:2: error: invalid function application in pattern, it cannot be reduced to a constructor (possible solution, mark term as inaccessible using '.( )')
.p + .n
