This appears to have been a semantic merge conflict between #3940 and
#4129. The effect on the language server is that if two edits are
sufficiently close in time to create an interrupt, some elaboration
steps like `simp` may accidentally catch the exception when it is
triggered during their execution, which makes incrementality assume that
elaboration of the body was successful, which can lead to incorrect
reuse, presenting the interrupted state to the user with symptoms such
as "uses sorry" without accompanying errors and incorrect lints.
Without this, it would not easy but perhaps be feasible to break
incrementality when editing command prefixes such as `set_option ... in
theorem` or also `theorem namesp.name ...` (which is a macro),
especially if at some later point we support incrementality in input
shifted by an edit. Explicit, sound support for these common cases will
be brought back soon.
