This PR significantly improves the performance of auto-completion by
optimizing individual requests by a factor of ~2 and by giving language
clients like VS Code the opportunity to reuse the state of previous
completion requests, thus greatly reducing the latency for the
auto-completion list to update when adding more characters to an
identifier.
In my testing:
- The latency of completing `C` in a file with `import Mathlib` was
reduced from ~1650ms to ~800ms
- The latency of completing `Cat` in a file with `import Mathlib` was
reduced from ~800ms to ~430ms
- The latency of completing dot notation was mostly unaffected
- Successive completions are now practically instant, e.g. if we were to
complete `C` and then type it out to `Cat`, before it would take roughly
~1650ms + ~800ms, whereas now there is only a significant latency for
completing `C` (~800ms) and the completion list is updated practically
instantly when typing out `Cat`.
<details>
<summary>(Video) Auto-completion latency before this PR</summary>
</details>
<details>
<summary>(Video) Auto-completion latency after this PR</summary>
</details>
In detail, this PR makes the following changes:
- Set `isIncomplete` to `false` in non-synthetic completion responses so
that the client can re-use these completion states.
- Replace the server side fuzzy matching with a simple and fast check
that all characters in the identifier thus far are present in the same
order in the declaration to match against. There are some examples where
the simple and fast check yields a completion item that the fuzzy
matching would filter, but since VS Code filters the completion items
with its own fuzzy matching after that anyways, these extra completion
items are never actually displayed to the user.
- Remove all notions of scoring and sorting completion items from the
language server. We now rely entirely on the client to sort the
completion items as it sees fit. In my testing, the only significant
change as a result of this is that while the language server would
sometimes penalize namespaces with lots of components, VS Code instead
uses a strictly alphabetic order. Even before this change, we never
actually really prioritized local variables over global variables, so
the penalty wasn't very helpful in practice. We might add some small
form of local variable prioritization in the future, though.
- Remove the empty completion list hack that was introduced in #1885. It
does not appear to be necessary anymore.
This PR fixes a bug in structure instance field completion that caused
it to not function correctly for bracketed structure instances written
in Mathlib style.
This PR adds configuration options for
`decide`/`decide!`/`native_decide` and refactors the tactics to be
frontends to the same backend. Adds a `+revert` option that cleans up
the local context and reverts all local variables the goal depends on,
along with indirect propositional hypotheses. Makes `native_decide` fail
at elaboration time on failure without sacrificing performance (the
decision procedure is still evaluated just once). Now `native_decide`
supports universe polymorphism.
Closes#2072
The `decide!` tactic is like `decide`, but when it tries reducing the
`Decidable` instance it uses kernel reduction rather than the
elaborator's reduction.
The kernel ignores transparency, so it can unfold all definitions (for
better or for worse). Furthermore, by using kernel reduction we can
cache the result as an auxiliary lemma — this is more efficient than
`decide`, which needs to reduce the instance twice: once in the
elaborator to check whether the tactic succeeds, and once again in the
kernel during final typechecking.
While RFC #5629 proposes a `decide!` that skips checking altogether
during elaboration, with this PR's `decide!` we can use `decide!` as
more-or-less a drop-in replacement for `decide`, since the tactic will
fail if kernel reduction fails.
This PR also includes two small fixes:
- `blameDecideReductionFailure` now uses `withIncRecDepth`.
- `Lean.Meta.zetaReduce` now instantiates metavariables while zeta
reducing.
Some profiling:
```lean
set_option maxRecDepth 2000
set_option trace.profiler true
set_option trace.profiler.threshold 0
theorem thm1 : 0 < 1 := by decide!
theorem thm1' : 0 < 1 := by decide
theorem thm2 : ∀ x < 400, x * x ≤ 160000 := by decide!
theorem thm2' : ∀ x < 400, x * x ≤ 160000 := by decide
/-
[Elab.command] [0.003655] theorem thm1 : 0 < 1 := by decide!
[Elab.command] [0.003164] theorem thm1' : 0 < 1 := by decide
[Elab.command] [0.133223] theorem thm2 : ∀ x < 400, x * x ≤ 160000 := by decide!
[Elab.command] [0.252310] theorem thm2' : ∀ x < 400, x * x ≤ 160000 := by decide
-/
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de>
This PR enables tactic completion in the whitespace of a tactic proof
and adds tactic docstrings to the completion menu.
Future work:
- A couple of broken tactic completions: This is due to tactic
completion now using @david-christiansen's `Tactic.Doc.allTacticDocs` to
obtain the tactic docstrings and should be fixed soon.
- Whitespace tactic completion in tactic combinators: This requires
changing the syntax of tactic combinators to produce a syntax node that
makes it clear that a tactic is expected at the given position.
Closes#1651.
