Commit graph

8 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kyle Miller
3854ba87b6
feat: pretty print letFun using have syntax (#8372)
This PR modifies the pretty printer to use `have` syntax instead of
`let_fun` syntax.
2025-05-16 15:10:01 +00:00
Kyle Miller
d39b0415f0
feat: enable pp.fieldNotation.generalized globally (#3744)
Sets the default value to `pp.fieldNotation.generalized` to `true`.
Updates tests, and fixes some minor flaws in the implementation of the
generalized field notation pretty printer.

Now generalized field notation won't be used for any function that has a
`motive` argument. This is intended to prevent recursors from pretty
printing using it as (1) recursors are more like control flow structures
than actual functions and (2) generalized field notation tends to cause
elaboration problems for recursors.

Note: be sure functions that have an `@[app_unexpander]` use
`@[pp_nodot]` if applicable. For example, `List.toArray` needs
`@[pp_nodot]` to ensure the unexpander prints it using `#[...]`
notation.
2024-03-23 02:38:09 +00:00
Kyle Miller
acb188f11c
feat: apply pp_using_anonymous_constructor attribute (#3735)
This attribute, which was implemented in #3640, is applied to the
following structures: `Sigma`, `PSigma`, `PProd`, `And`, `Subtype`, and
`Fin`. These were given this attribute in Lean 3.
2024-03-22 00:30:36 +00:00
Leonardo de Moura
97e7e668d6
chore: pp.proofs.withType is now false by default (#3379)
`pp.proofs.withType := true` often produces too much noise in the info
view.
2024-02-17 15:09:24 +00:00
Scott Morrison
18afefda96
chore: upstream basic statements about inequalities (#3366) 2024-02-16 05:42:38 +00:00
Kyle Miller
e29d75a961
feat: have pp.proofs use for omission (#3241)
By having the `pp.proofs` feature use `⋯` when omitting proofs, when
users copy/paste terms from the InfoView the elaborator can give an
error message explaining why the term cannot be elaborated.

Also adds `pp.proofs.threshold` option to allow users to pretty print
shallow proof terms. By default, only atomic proof terms are pretty
printed.

This adjustment was suggested in PR #3201, which added `⋯` and the
related `pp.deepTerms` option.
2024-02-15 21:49:41 +00:00
Kyle Miller
a2226a43ac
feat: encode let_fun using a letFun function (#2973)
Switches from encoding `let_fun` using an annotated `(fun x : t => b) v`
expression to a function application `letFun v (fun x : t => b)`.

---------

Co-authored-by: Sebastian Ullrich <sebasti@nullri.ch>
2023-12-18 09:01:42 +00:00
Leonardo de Moura
1c00f29043 test: add let_fun pretty printing test 2021-09-16 10:14:42 -07:00