This PR implements basic model-based theory combination in `grind`.
`grind` can now solve examples such as
```lean
example (f : Int → Int) (x : Int)
: 0 ≤ x → x ≠ 0 → x ≤ 1 → f x = 2 → f 1 = 2 := by
grind
```
This PR adds a convenience for inductive predicates in `grind`. Now,
give an inductive predicate `C`, `grind [C]` marks `C` terms as
case-split candidates **and** `C` constructors as E-matching theorems.
Here is an example:
```lean
example {B S T s t} (hcond : B s) : (ifThenElse B S T, s) ==> t → (S, s) ==> t := by
grind [BigStep]
```
Users can still use `grind [cases BigStep]` to only mark `C` as a case
split candidate.
This PR fixes a few bugs in the `grind` tactic: missing issues, bad
error messages, incorrect threshold in the canonicalizer, and bug in the
ground pattern internalizer.
This PR introduces a new feature that allows users to specify which
inductive datatypes the `grind` tactic should perform case splits on.
The configuration option `splitIndPred` is now set to `false` by
default. The attribute `[grind cases]` is used to mark inductive
datatypes and predicates that `grind` may case split on during the
search. Additionally, the attribute `[grind cases eager]` can be used to
mark datatypes and predicates for case splitting both during
pre-processing and the search.
Users can also write `grind [HasType]` or `grind [cases HasType]` to
instruct `grind` to perform case splitting on the inductive predicate
`HasType` in a specific instance. Similarly, `grind [-Or]` can be used
to instruct `grind` not to case split on disjunctions.
Co-authored-by: Leonardo de Moura <leodemoura@amazon.com>
