Adds `IO.getTaskState` which returns the state of a `Task` in the Lean
runtime's task manager. The `TaskState` inductive has 3 constructors:
`waiting`, `running`, and `finished`. The `waiting` constructor
encompasses the waiting and queued states within the C task object
documentation, because the task object does not provide a low cost way
to distinguish these different forms of waiting. Furthermore, it seems
unlikely for consumers to wish to distinguish between these internal
states. The `running` constructor encompasses both the running and
promised states in C docs. While not ideal, the C implementation does
not provide a way to distinguish between a running `Task` and a waiting
`Promise.result` (they both have null closures).
The main loop logic could be simplified, and `if let` could be used to
make control flow more obvious.
Also adds a check for macro scopes to prevent `unresolveNameGlobal` from
returning names with macro scopes in the event there's an alias with
one.
This is a follow up to #3946.
This reverts commit 706a4cfd73 introduced
in #3970
As explained in #4124, `findM?` can become a footgun if used in monads
which induce side-effects such as caching. This PR removes that
function, and fixes the code introduced by #3398 for which the function
was first added.
cc @semorrison.
we keep running into examples where working with well-founded recursion
is slow because defeq checks (which are all over the place, including
failing ones that are back-tracked) unfold well-founded definitions.
The definition of a function defined by well-founded recursion should be
an implementation detail that should only be peeked inside by the
equation generator and the functional induction generator.
We now mark the mutual recursive function as irreducible (if the user
did not
set a flag explicitly), and use `withAtLeastTransparency .all` when
producing
the equations.
Proofs can be fixed by using rewriting, or – a bit blunt, but nice for
adjusting
existing proofs – using `unseal` (a.k.a. `attribute [local
semireducible]`).
Mathlib performance does not change a whole lot:
http://speed.lean-fro.org/mathlib4/compare/08b82265-75db-4a28-b12b-08751b9ad04a/to/16f46d5e-28b1-41c4-a107-a6f6594841f8
Build instructions -0.126 %, four modules with significant instructions
decrease.
To reduce impact, these definitions were changed:
* `Nat.mod`, to make `1 % n` reduce definitionally, so that `1` as a
`Fin 2` literal
works nicely. Theorems with larger `Fin` literals tend to need a `unseal
Nat.modCore`
https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4098
* `List.ofFn` rewritten to be structurally recursive and not go via
`Array.ofFn`:
https://github.com/leanprover-community/batteries/pull/784
Alternative designs explored were
* Making `WellFounded.fix` irreducible.
One benefit is that recursive functions with equal definitions (possibly
after
instantiating fixed parameters) are defeq; this is used in mathlib to
relate
[`OrdinalApprox.gfpApprox`](https://leanprover-community.github.io/mathlib4_docs/Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/FixedPointApproximants.html#OrdinalApprox.gfpApprox)
with `.lfpApprox`.
But the downside is that one cannot use `unseal` in a
targeted way, being explicit in which recursive function needs to be
reducible here.
And in cases where Lean does unwanted unfolding, we’d still unfold the
recursive
definition once to expose `WellFounded.fix`, leading to large terms for
often no good
reason.
* Defining `WellFounded.fix` to unroll defintionally once before hitting
a irreducible
`WellFounded.fixF`. This was explored in #4002. It shares most of the
ups and downs
with the previous variant, with the additional neat benefit that
function calls that
do not lead to recursive cases (e.g. a `[]` base case) reduce nicely.
This means that
the majority of existing `rfl` proofs continue to work.
Issue #4051, which demonstrates how badly things can go if wf recursive
functions can be
unrolled, showed that making the recursive function irreducible there
leads to noticeably
faster elaboration than making `WellFounded.fix` irreducible; this is
good evidence that
the present PR is the way to go.
This fixes https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/3988
---------
Co-authored-by: Leonardo de Moura <leomoura@amazon.com>
This fixes#2901, a bug in the old compiler which causes a segfault. The
issue is that when visiting `noConfusion` applications, it assumes that
each constructor case has `nfields` arguments, e.g. `head1 = head2 ->
tail1 = tail2 -> P` has two arguments because `List.cons` has 2 fields,
but in fact propositional fields are skipped by the noConfusion type
generator, so for example `Subtype.noConfusionType` is:
```lean
@[reducible] protected def Subtype.noConfusionType.{u_1, u} : {α : Sort u} →
{p : α → Prop} → Sort u_1 → Subtype p → Subtype p → Sort u_1 :=
fun {α} {p} P v1 v2 ↦
Subtype.casesOn v1 fun val property ↦ Subtype.casesOn v2 fun val_1 property ↦
(val = val_1 → P) → P
```
where `val = val_1 → P` only has the one argument even though
`Subtype.mk` has two fields, presumably because it is useless to have an
equality of propositions. Unfortunately there isn't any easy cache or
getter to use here to get the number of non-propositional fields, so we
just calculate it on the spot.
Fixes#3270 by moving the deprecation check from
`Lean.Elab.Term.mkConsts` to `Lean.Elab.Term.mkConst`, so
`Lean.Elab.Term.mkBaseProjections`, `.elabAppLValsAux`, `.elabAppFn`,
and `.elabForIn` also hit the check. Not all of these really need to hit
the check, so I'll run `!bench` to see if it's a problem.
this is in preparation for #4061. Once that lands, `1 % 42 = 1` will no
longer hold definitionally (at least not without an ungly `unseal
Nat.modCore in` around). This affects mathlib in a few places,
essentially every time a `1 : Fin (n+1)` literal is written.
So this extends the existing special case for `0 % n = 0` to `1 % n`.
https://live.lean-lang.org/#project=lean-nightly now allows users to
play around with the latest lean nightly, and it seems prudent to ask
them to test bug reports, if possible, there, and not just with whatever
release they use.
Also reformatted the descriptions to look well in a text area. Users
will not see this as rendered markdown, but as plain text.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Ullrich <sebasti@nullri.ch>
As [reported on
Zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/341532-lean4-dev/topic/Find.20references.20broken.20in.20lean.20core/near/437051935).
The `mainModuleName` was being set incorrectly when browsing lean core
sources, resulting in failure of cross-file server requests like "Find
References". Because the `srcSearchPath` is generated asynchronously, we
store it as a `Task Name` which is resolved some time before the header
is finished parsing. (I don't think the `.get` here will ever block,
because the srcSearchPath will be ready by the time the initial command
snap is requested.)
---------
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Ullrich <sebasti@nullri.ch>
Add docstrings and usage examples for `String.length`, `.push`,
`.append`, `.get?`, `.set`, `.modyify`, and `.next`. Update docstrings
and add usage examples for `String.toList`, `.get`, and `.get!`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de>
Co-authored-by: David Thrane Christiansen <david@davidchristiansen.dk>
This issue was affecting several Mathlib files.
@mattrobball @semorrison This is a different solution for the issue. The
comment at `Extra.lean` describes the new solution and documents the new
issues found with the previous one.
closes#4085
This makes the `leanArts` in `library_data leanArts : BuildJob Unit` get
a hover for the generated axiom. It also simplifies the `quoteFrom`
function so that it delaborates properly by using a name literal (which
elaborates to `mkStr1`, `mkStr2` etc) instead of a `mkStr` application.
otherwise it remains in the equational theorem and may cause the
“unused have linter” to trigger. By moving the proof into
`decreasing_by`, the equational theorems are unencumbered by termination
arguments.
see also
https://github.com/leanprover/std4/pull/690#issuecomment-2095378609
Closes#3386
Currently, when generating the signature of an injectivity lemma for a
certain constructor `c : forall xs, Foo a_1 ... a_n`,
`mkInjectiveTheoremTypeCore?` will differentiate between variables which
are bound to stay the same between the two equal values (i.e inductive
indices), and non-fixed ones. To do that, the function currently checks
whether a variable `x ∈ xs` appears in the final co-domain `Foo a_1 ...
a_n` of the constructor. This condition isn't enough however. As shown
in the linked issue, the codomain may also depend on variables which
appears in the type of free vars contained in `Foo a_1 ... a_n`, but not
in the term itself. This PR fixes the issue by also checking the types
of any free variable occuring in the final codomain, so as to ensure
injectivity lemmas are well-typed.
This PR upstreams lemmas about List/Array operations already defined in
Lean from std/batteries.
Happy to take suggestions about increasing or decreasing scope.
---------
Co-authored-by: Mario Carneiro <di.gama@gmail.com>
On
[Zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/270676-lean4/topic/Notation.20in.20namespace.20not.20showing.20in.20pp/near/437016468),
Peter Nelson reported that notations that could be pretty printed with
generalized field notation did not pretty print using the intended
notation.
This PR makes it so that app unexpanders are considered before
generalized field notation. The complexity before was that we wanted to
do parent projection collapse, and since we did the collapse before
pretty printing that argument, it meant it wasn't possible to do app
unexpanders when there was a field notation candidate. The new solution
is to collapse parent projections only when actually considering field
notation, which can be done because we can safely strip off projection
syntax in an expression-directed way.
The layout algorithm, while somewhat finicky, is (unfortunately)
necessary for C code to interface with lean structures. This adds a
(AFAIK) complete description of the layout algorithm, including a worked
example large enough to make it possible to reconstruct the whole
decision diagram.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Ullrich <sebasti@nullri.ch>
This is still experimental, but it implements identifier support in auto
tactics "in the obvious way". It also converts `quoteAutoTactic` to
generate Expr directly instead of going via syntax (this doesn't have
any effect other than increasing compile cost AFAICT).
