This PR migrates usages of `Std.Range` to the new polymorphic ranges.
This PR unfortunately increases the transitive imports for
frequently-used parts of `Init` because the ranges now rely on iterators
in order to provide their functionality for types other than `Nat`.
However, iteration over ranges in compiled code is as efficient as
before in the examples I checked. This is because of a special
`IteratorLoop` implementation provided in the PR for this purpose.
There were two issues that were uncovered during migration:
* In `IndPredBelow.lean`, migrating the last remaining range causes
`compilerTest1.lean` to break. I have minimized the issue and came to
the conclusion it's a compiler bug. Therefore, I have not replaced said
old range usage yet (see #9186).
* In `BRecOn.lean`, we are publicly importing the ranges. Making this
import private should theoretically work, but there seems to be a
problem with the module system, causing the build to panic later in
`Init.Data.Grind.Poly` (see #9185).
* In `FuzzyMatching.lean`, inlining fails with the new ranges, which
would have led to significant slowdown. Therefore, I have not migrated
this file either.
This PR extends `Std.Channel` to provide a full sync and async API, as
well as unbounded, zero sized and bounded channels.
A few notes on the implementation:
- the bounded channel is inspired by [Go channels on
steroids](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yIAYmbvL3JxOKOjuCyon7JhW4cSv1wy5hC0ApeGMV9s/pub)
though currently doesn't do any of the lock-free optimizations
- @mhuisi convinced me that having a non-closable channel may be a good
idea as this alleviates the need for error handling which is very
annoying when working with `Task`. This does complicate the API a little
bit and I'm not quite sure whether this is a choice we want users to
give. An alternative to this would be to just write `send!` that panics
on sending to a closed channel (receiving from a closed channel is not
an error), this is for example the behavior that golang goes with.
