Extends Lean's incremental reporting and reuse between commands into
various steps inside declarations:
* headers and bodies of each (mutual) definition/theorem
* `theorem ... := by` for each contained tactic step, including
recursively inside supported combinators currently consisting of
* `·` (cdot), `case`, `next`
* `induction`, `cases`
* macros such as `next` unfolding to the above
*Incremental reuse* means not recomputing any such steps if they are not
affected by a document change. *Incremental reporting* includes the
parts seen in the recording above: the progress bar and messages. Other
language server features such as hover etc. are *not yet* supported
incrementally, i.e. they are shown only when the declaration has been
fully processed as before.
---------
Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com>
luckily the necessary functionality already exists in the form of
`addPPExplicitToExposeDiff`. But it is not cheap, and we should not run
this code
when the error message isn’t shown, so we should do this lazily.
We already had `MessageData.ofPPFormat` to assemble the error message
lazily, but it
was restricted to returning `FormatWithInfo`, a data type that doesn’t
admit a nice
API to compose more complex messages (like `Format` or `MessageData`
has; an attempt to
fix that is in #3926).
Therefore we split the functionality of `.ofPPFormat` into
`.ofFormatWithInfo` and `.ofLazy`,
and use `.ofLazy` to compute the more complex error message of `apply`.
Fixes#3232.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Thrane Christiansen <david@davidchristiansen.dk>
Co-authored-by: Wojciech Nawrocki <wjnawrocki@protonmail.com>
Summary:
- Take `synthPendingDepth` into account when caching TC results
- Add `maxSynthPendingDepth` option with default := 2.
- Add support for tracking `synthPending` failures when using
`set_option diagnostics true`
closes#2522closes#3313closes#3927
Identical to #4114 but with `maxSynthPendingDepth := 1`
closes#4114
cc @semorrison
It currently only reports how many times each declaration has been
unfolded, and how often the `isDefEq` heuristic for `f a =?= f b` has
been used. Only counters above the threshold are reported.
Reusing the best profiling UI out there
Usage:
```
lean -Dtrace.profiler=true -Dtrace.profiler.output=profile.json foo.lean ...
```
then open `profile.json` in https://profiler.firefox.com/.
See also `script/collideProfiles.lean` for minimizing and merging
profiles.
This coercion caused difficult-to-diagnose bugs sometimes. Because there
are some situations where converting a string to a name should be done
by parsing the string, and others where it should not, an explicit
choice seems better here.
---------
Co-authored-by: Mac Malone <tydeu@hatpress.net>
This adds the concept of **functional induction** to lean.
Derived from the definition of a (possibly mutually) recursive function,
a **functional
induction principle** is tailored to proofs about that function. For
example from:
```
def ackermann : Nat → Nat → Nat
| 0, m => m + 1
| n+1, 0 => ackermann n 1
| n+1, m+1 => ackermann n (ackermann (n + 1) m)
derive_functional_induction ackermann
```
we get
```
ackermann.induct (motive : Nat → Nat → Prop) (case1 : ∀ (m : Nat), motive 0 m)
(case2 : ∀ (n : Nat), motive n 1 → motive (Nat.succ n) 0)
(case3 : ∀ (n m : Nat), motive (n + 1) m → motive n (ackermann (n + 1) m) → motive (Nat.succ n) (Nat.succ m))
(x x : Nat) : motive x x
```
At the moment, the user has to ask for the functional induction
principle explicitly using
```
derive_functional_induction ackermann
```
The module docstring of `Lean/Meta/Tactic/FunInd.lean` contains more
details on the
design and implementation of this command.
More convenience around this (e.g. a `functional induction` tactic) will
follow eventually.
This PR includes a bunch of `PSum`/`PSigma` related functions in the
`Lean.Tactic.FunInd`
namespace. I plan to move these to `PackArgs`/`PackMutual` afterwards,
and do some cleaning
up as I do that.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Thrane Christiansen <david@davidchristiansen.dk>
Co-authored-by: Leonardo de Moura <leomoura@amazon.com>
We want to be able to update `InfoState` at `AttrM` which is just an
alias for `CoreM`.
I considered defining `AttrM` as `StateRefT InfoState CoreM`, but this
is problematic because we also want to invoke `AttrM` monadic
actions from `MetaM`.
Closes#1350
