This PR improves the diagnostic information provided in `grind` failure
states. We now include the list of issues found during the search, and
all search thresholds that have been reached. This PR also improves its
formatting.
This PR adds support for numerals, lower & upper bounds to the offset
constraint module in the `grind` tactic. `grind` can now solve examples
such as:
```
example (f : Nat → Nat) :
f 2 = a →
b ≤ 1 → b ≥ 1 →
c = b + 1 →
f c = a := by
grind
```
In the example above, the literal `2` and the lower&upper bounds, `b ≤
1` and `b ≥ 1`, are now processed by offset constraint module.
This PR implements support for offset equality constraints in the
`grind` tactic and exhaustive equality propagation for them. The `grind`
tactic can now solve problems such as the following:
```lean
example (f : Nat → Nat) (a b c d e : Nat) :
f (a + 3) = b →
f (c + 1) = d →
c ≤ a + 2 →
a + 1 ≤ e →
e < c →
b = d := by
grind
```
This PR improves the failure message produced by the `grind` tactic. We
now include information about asserted facts, propositions that are
known to be true and false, and equivalence classes.
This PR adds a simple strategy to the (WIP) `grind` tactic. It just
keeps internalizing new theorem instances found by E-matching. The
simple strategy can solve examples such as:
```lean
grind_pattern Array.size_set => Array.set a i v h
grind_pattern Array.get_set_eq => a.set i v h
grind_pattern Array.get_set_ne => (a.set i v hi)[j]
example (as bs : Array α) (v : α)
(i : Nat)
(h₁ : i < as.size)
(h₂ : bs = as.set i v)
: as.size = bs.size := by
grind
example (as bs cs : Array α) (v : α)
(i : Nat)
(h₁ : i < as.size)
(h₂ : bs = as.set i v)
(h₃ : cs = bs)
(h₄ : i ≠ j)
(h₅ : j < cs.size)
(h₆ : j < as.size)
: cs[j] = as[j] := by
grind
opaque R : Nat → Nat → Prop
theorem Rtrans (a b c : Nat) : R a b → R b c → R a c := sorry
grind_pattern Rtrans => R a b, R b c
example : R a b → R b c → R c d → R d e → R a d := by
grind
```
This PR completes the implementation of `addCongrTable` in the (WIP)
`grind` tactic. It also adds a new test to demonstrate why the extra
check is needed. It also updates the field `cgRoot` (congruence root).
This PR adds support for constructors to the (WIP) `grind` tactic. When
merging equivalence classes, `grind` checks for equalities between
constructors. If they are distinct, it closes the goal; if they are the
same, it applies injectivity.
This PR adds support for detecting congruent terms in the (WIP) `grind`
tactic. It also introduces the `grind.debug` option, which, when set to
`true`, checks many invariants after each equivalence class is merged.
This option is intended solely for debugging purposes.
Many of our tests in `tests/lean/run/` produce output from `#eval` (or
`#check`) statements, that is then ignored.
This PR tries to capture all the useful output using `#guard_msgs`. I've
only done a cursory check that the output is still sane --- there is a
chance that some "unchecked" tests have already accumulated regressions
and this just cements them!
In the other direction, I did identify two rotten tests:
* a minor one in `setStructInstNotation.lean`, where a comment says `Set
Nat`, but `#check` actually prints `?_`. Weird?
* `CompilerProbe.lean` is generating empty output, apparently indicating
that something is broken, but I don't know the signficance of this file.
In any case, I'll ask about these elsewhere.
(This started by noticing that a recent `grind` test file had an
untested `trace_state`, and then got carried away.)
