This PR adds the `grind` configuration option `verbose`. For example,
`grind -verbose` disables all diagnostics. We are going to use this flag
to implement `try?`.
This PR fixes a few `grind` issues exposed by the `grind_constProp.lean`
test.
- Support for equational theorem hypotheses created before invoking
`grind`. Example: applying an induction principle.s
- Support of `Unit`-like types.
- Missing recursion depth checks.
This PR fixes the support for case splitting on data in the `grind`
tactic. The following example works now:
```lean
inductive C where
| a | b | c
def f : C → Nat
| .a => 2
| .b => 3
| .c => 4
example : f x > 1 := by
grind [
f, -- instructs `grind` to use `f`-equation theorems,
C -- instructs `grind` to case-split on free variables of type `C`
]
```
This PR fixes a bug in the internalization of offset terms in the
`grind` tactic. For example, `grind` was failing to solve the following
example because of this bug.
```lean
example (f : Nat → Nat) : f (a + 1) = 1 → a = 0 → f 1 = 1 := by
grind
```
This PR fixes a few bugs in the `grind` tactic: missing issues, bad
error messages, incorrect threshold in the canonicalizer, and bug in the
ground pattern internalizer.
This PR ensures that the branches of an `if-then-else` term are
internalized only after establishing the truth value of the condition.
This change makes its behavior consistent with the `match`-expression
and dependent `if-then-else` behavior in `grind`.
This feature is particularly important for recursive functions defined
by well-founded recursion and `if-then-else`. Without lazy
`if-then-else` branch internalization, the equation theorem for the
recursive function would unfold until reaching the generation depth
threshold, and before performing any case analysis. See new tests for an
example.
This PR adds support for case splitting on `match`-expressions with
overlapping patterns to the `grind` tactic. `grind` can now solve
examples such as:
```
inductive S where
| mk1 (n : Nat)
| mk2 (n : Nat) (s : S)
| mk3 (n : Bool)
| mk4 (s1 s2 : S)
def g (x y : S) :=
match x, y with
| .mk1 a, _ => a + 2
| _, .mk2 1 (.mk4 _ _) => 3
| .mk3 _, .mk4 _ _ => 4
| _, _ => 5
example : g a b > 1 := by
grind [g.eq_def]
```
This PR adds better support for overlapping `match` patterns in `grind`.
`grind` can now solve examples such as
```lean
inductive S where
| mk1 (n : Nat)
| mk2 (n : Nat) (s : S)
| mk3 (n : Bool)
| mk4 (s1 s2 : S)
def f (x y : S) :=
match x, y with
| .mk1 _, _ => 2
| _, .mk2 1 (.mk4 _ _) => 3
| .mk3 _, _ => 4
| _, _ => 5
example : b = .mk2 y1 y2 → y1 = 2 → a = .mk4 y3 y4 → f a b = 5 := by
unfold f
grind (splits := 0)
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Leonardo de Moura <leodemoura@amazon.com>
This PR introduces a new feature that allows users to specify which
inductive datatypes the `grind` tactic should perform case splits on.
The configuration option `splitIndPred` is now set to `false` by
default. The attribute `[grind cases]` is used to mark inductive
datatypes and predicates that `grind` may case split on during the
search. Additionally, the attribute `[grind cases eager]` can be used to
mark datatypes and predicates for case splitting both during
pre-processing and the search.
Users can also write `grind [HasType]` or `grind [cases HasType]` to
instruct `grind` to perform case splitting on the inductive predicate
`HasType` in a specific instance. Similarly, `grind [-Or]` can be used
to instruct `grind` not to case split on disjunctions.
Co-authored-by: Leonardo de Moura <leodemoura@amazon.com>
This PR adds support for beta reduction in the `grind` tactic. `grind`
can now solve goals such as
```lean
example (f : Nat → Nat) : f = (fun x : Nat => x + 5) → f 2 > 5 := by
grind
```
This PR improves the canonicalizer used in the `grind` tactic and the
diagnostics it produces. It also adds a new configuration option,
`canonHeartbeats`, to address (some of) the issues. Here is an example
illustrating the new diagnostics, where we intentionally create a
problem by using a very small number of heartbeats.
<img width="1173" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/484005c8-dcaa-4164-8fbf-617864ed7350"
/>
This PR improves the diagnostic information provided in `grind` failure
states. We now include the list of issues found during the search, and
all search thresholds that have been reached. This PR also improves its
formatting.
This PR adds support for numerals, lower & upper bounds to the offset
constraint module in the `grind` tactic. `grind` can now solve examples
such as:
```
example (f : Nat → Nat) :
f 2 = a →
b ≤ 1 → b ≥ 1 →
c = b + 1 →
f c = a := by
grind
```
In the example above, the literal `2` and the lower&upper bounds, `b ≤
1` and `b ≥ 1`, are now processed by offset constraint module.
This PR implements support for offset equality constraints in the
`grind` tactic and exhaustive equality propagation for them. The `grind`
tactic can now solve problems such as the following:
```lean
example (f : Nat → Nat) (a b c d e : Nat) :
f (a + 3) = b →
f (c + 1) = d →
c ≤ a + 2 →
a + 1 ≤ e →
e < c →
b = d := by
grind
```
This PR implements support for offset constraints in the `grind` tactic.
Several features are still missing, such as constraint propagation and
support for offset equalities, but `grind` can already solve examples
like the following:
```lean
example (a b c : Nat) : a ≤ b → b + 2 ≤ c → a + 1 ≤ c := by
grind
example (a b c : Nat) : a ≤ b → b ≤ c → a ≤ c := by
grind
example (a b c : Nat) : a + 1 ≤ b → b + 1 ≤ c → a + 2 ≤ c := by
grind
example (a b c : Nat) : a + 1 ≤ b → b + 1 ≤ c → a + 1 ≤ c := by
grind
example (a b c : Nat) : a + 1 ≤ b → b ≤ c + 2 → a ≤ c + 1 := by
grind
example (a b c : Nat) : a + 2 ≤ b → b ≤ c + 2 → a ≤ c := by
grind
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Kim Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com>
This PR adds support for creating local E-matching theorems for
universal propositions known to be true. It allows `grind` to
automatically solve examples such as:
```lean
example (b : List α) (p : α → Prop) (h₁ : ∀ a ∈ b, p a) (h₂ : ∃ a ∈ b, ¬p a) : False := by
grind
```
This PR fixes a bug in the congruence closure data structure used in the
`grind` tactic. The new test includes an example that previously caused
a panic. A similar panic was also occurring in the test
`grind_nested_proofs.lean`.
This PR adds support for activating relevant theorems for the (WIP)
`grind` tactic. We say a theorem is relevant to a `grind` goal if the
symbols occurring in its patterns also occur in the goal.
This PR completes the implementation of `addCongrTable` in the (WIP)
`grind` tactic. It also adds a new test to demonstrate why the extra
check is needed. It also updates the field `cgRoot` (congruence root).
