This PR adds infrastructure for the upcoming `grind` tactic mode, which
will be similar to the `conv` mode. The goal is to extend `grind` from a
terminal tactic into an interactive mode: `grind => …`.
It will serve as the foundation for `ungrind`, the process of converting
an expensive (and potentially fragile) `grind` proof into a robust
script. This mode will include tactics for expensive reasoning steps
such as cutsat model-based search, Gröbner basis computation,
E-matching, case splits, and more.
It will also provide robust, succinct references to facts and terms:
labels, structural matches, and anchors (e.g., `#abcd`).
This PR simplifies the `grind order` module, and internalizes the order
constraints. It removes the `Offset` type class because it introduced
too much complexity. We now cover the same use cases with a simpler
approach:
- Any type that implements at least `Std.IsPreorder`
- Arbitrary ordered rings.
- `Nat` by the `Nat.ToInt` adapter.
This PR tries to improve the E-matching pattern inference for `grind`.
That said, we still need better tools for annotating and maintaining
`grind` annotations in libraries.
closes#9125
This PR adjusts the experimental module system to make `private` the
default visibility modifier in `module`s, introducing `public` as a new
modifier instead. `public section` can be used to revert the default for
an entire section, though this is more intended to ease gradual adoption
of the new semantics such as in `Init` (and soon `Std`) where they
should be replaced by a future decl-by-decl re-review of visibilities.
This PR adds typeclasses for `grind` to embed types into `Int`, for
cutsat. This allows, for example, treating `Fin n`, or Mathlib's `ℕ+` in
a uniform and extensible way.
There is a primary typeclass that carries the `toInt` function, and a
description of the interval the type embeds in. There are then
individual typeclasses describing how arithmetic/order operations
interact with the embedding.
This PR uses `grind` to shorten some proofs in the LRAT checker. The
intention is not particularly to improve the quality or maintainability
of these proofs (although hopefully this is a side effect), but just to
give `grind` a work out.
There are a number of remaining notes, either about places where `grind`
fails with an internal error (for which #8608 is hopefully
representative, and we can fix after that), or `omega` works but `grind`
doesn't (to be investigated later).
Only in some of the files have I thoroughly used grind. In many files
I've just replaced leaves or branches of proofs with `grind` where it
worked easily, without setting up the internal annotations in the LRAT
library required to optimize the use of `grind`. It's diminishing
returns to do this in a proof library that is not high priority, so I've
simply drawn a line.
This PR adds `Lean.Grind.Ring.IsOrdered`, and cleans up the ring/module
grind API. These typeclasses are at present unused, but will support
future algorithmic improvements in `grind`.
This PR improves the failure message produced by the `grind` tactic. We
now include information about asserted facts, propositions that are
known to be true and false, and equivalence classes.
