This PR enables the elaboration of theorem bodies, i.e. proofs, to
happen in parallel to each other as well as to other elaboration tasks.
Specifically, to be eligible for parallel proof elaboration,
* the theorem must not be in a `mutual` block
* `deprecated.oldSectionVars` must not be set
* `Elab.async` must be set (currently defaults to `true` in the language
server, `false` on the cmdline)
To be activated for downstream projects (i.e. in stage 1) pending
further Mathlib validation.
This PR ensures that conditional equation theorems for function
definitions are handled correctly in `grind`. We use the same
infrastructure built for `match`-expression equations. Recall that in
both cases, these theorems are conditional when there are overlapping
patterns.
in #4154 and #5129 the rules for equational lemmas have changed, and new
options were introduced that can be used to revert to the pre-4.12
behavior. Hopefully nobody really needs these options besides for
backwards compatibility, therefore we put these options in the
`backward` option name space.
So the previous behavior can be achieved by setting
```lean
set_option backward.eqns.nonrecursive false
set_option backward.eqns.deepRecursiveSplit false
```
With this, lean produces the following zoo of rewrite rules:
```
Option.map.eq_1 : Option.map f none = none
Option.map.eq_2 : Option.map f (some x) = some (f x)
Option.map.eq_def : Option.map f p = match o with | none => none | (some x) => some (f x)
Option.map.eq_unfold : Option.map = fun f p => match o with | none => none | (some x) => some (f x)
```
The `f.eq_unfold` variant is especially useful to rewrite with `rw`
under
binders.
This implements and fixes#5110
This is part of #3983.
After #4154 introduced equational lemmas for non-recursive functions and
#5055
unififed the lemmas for structural and wf recursive funcitons, this now
disables the special handling of recursive functions in
`findMatchToSplit?`, so that the equational lemmas should be the same no
matter how the function was defined.
The new option `eqns.deepRecursiveSplit` can be disabled to get the old
behavior.
### Breaking change
This can break existing code, as there now can be extra equational
lemmas:
* Explicit uses of `f.eq_2` might have to be adjusted if the numbering
changed.
* Uses of `rw [f]` or `simp [f]` may no longer apply if they previously
matched (and introduced a `match` statement), when the equational
lemmas got more fine-grained.
In this case either case analysis on the parameters before rewriting
helps, or setting the option `opt.deepRecursiveSplit false` while
defining the function
This is part of #3983.
Fine-grained equational lemmas are useful even for non-recursive
functions, so this adds them.
The new option `eqns.nonrecursive` can be set to `false` to have the old
behavior.
### Breaking channge
This is a breaking change: Previously, `rw [Option.map]` would rewrite
`Option.map f o` to `match o with … `. Now this rewrite will fail
because the equational lemmas require constructors here (like they do
for, say, `List.map`).
Remedies:
* Split on `o` before rewriting.
* Use `rw [Option.map.eq_def]`, which rewrites any (saturated)
application of `Option.map`
* Use `set_option eqns.nonrecursive false` when *defining* the function
in question.
### Interaction with simp
The `simp` tactic so far had a special provision for non-recursive
functions so that `simp [f]` will try to use the equational lemmas, but
will also unfold `f` else, so less breakage here (but maybe performance
improvements with functions with many cases when applied to a
constructor, as the simplifier will no longer unfold to a large
`match`-statement and then collapse it right away).
For projection functions and functions marked `[reducible]`, `simp [f]`
won’t use the equational theorems, and will only use its internal
unfolding machinery.
### Implementation notes
It uses the same `mkEqnTypes` function as for recursive functions, so we
are close to a consistency here. There is still the wrinkle that for
recursive functions we don't split matches without an interesting
recursive call inside. Unifying that is future work.
It have to keep it as a private definition for now. We currently only
support duplicate theorems in different modules. Splitters are generated
on demand, and are also used to write code.
Given a definition `foo`, they were previously called `foo._unfold`
until 4.7.0. We tried to rename them to `foo.def`, but it created too
many issues in the Mathlib repo. We decided to rename it again to
`foo.eq_def`. The new name is also consistent with the `eq_<idx>`
theorems generated for different "cases". That is, `foo.eq_def` is the
equality theorem for the whole definition, and `foo.eq_<idx>` is the
equality theorem for case `<idx>`.
cc @semorrison
- Add support for reserved declaration names. We use them for theorems
generated on demand.
- Equation theorems are not private declarations anymore.
- Generate equation theorems on demand when resolving symbols.
- Prevent users from creating declarations using reserved names. Users
can bypass it using meta-programming.
See next test for examples.
