This PR implements signature help support. When typing a function
application, editors with support for signature help will now display a
popup that designates the current (remaining) function type. This
removes the need to remember the function signature while typing the
function application, or having to constantly cycle between hovering
over the function identifier and typing the application. In VS Code, the
signature help can be triggered manually using `Ctrl+Shift+Space`.
### Other changes
- In order to support signature help for the partial syntax `f a <|` or
`f a $`, these notations now elaborate as `f a`, not `f a .missing`.
- The logic in `delabConstWithSignature` that delaborates parameters is
factored out into a function `delabForallParamsWithSignature` so that it
can be used for arbitrary `forall`s, not just constants.
- The `InfoTree` formatter is adjusted to produce output where it is
easier to identify the kind of `Info` in the `InfoTree`.
- A bug in `InfoTree.smallestInfo?` is fixed so that it doesn't panic
anymore when its predicate `p` does not ensure that both `pos?` and
`tailPos?` of the `Info` are present.
This PR fixes an issue when including a hard line break in a `Format`
that caused subsequent (ordinary) line breaks to be erroneously
flattened to spaces.
This issue is especially important for displaying notes and hints in
error messages, as these components could appear garbled due to improper
line-break rendering.
This PR adds a mixin typeclass for `Lean.Grind.CommRing` recording the
characteristic of the ring, and constructs instances for `Int`, `IntX`,
`UIntX`, and `BitVec`.
This PR enables the elaboration of theorem bodies, i.e. proofs, to
happen in parallel to each other as well as to other elaboration tasks.
Specifically, to be eligible for parallel proof elaboration,
* the theorem must not be in a `mutual` block
* `deprecated.oldSectionVars` must not be set
* `Elab.async` must be set (currently defaults to `true` in the language
server, `false` on the cmdline)
To be activated for downstream projects (i.e. in stage 1) pending
further Mathlib validation.
This PR prevents `exact?` and `apply?` from suggesting tactics that
correspond to correct proofs but do not elaborate, and it allows these
tactics to suggest `expose_names` when needed.
These tactics now indicate that a non-compiling term was generated but
do not suggest that that term be inserted. `exact?` also no longer
suggests that the user try `apply?` if no partial suggestions were
found.
This addresses part of #5407 but does not achieve the exact expected
behavior therein (due to #6122).
This PR adds a convenience command `#info_trees in`, which prints the
info trees generated by the following command. It is useful for
debugging or learning about `InfoTree`.
