/- The tactic search_mem_list defined at back.lean does not update the tactic_state. More importantly, it does not change the set of goals that need to be solved. It is also possible to write a very compact search_mem_list on top of the apply tactic. This version will create subgoals while searching for a proof of (a ∈ e). -/ open list expr tactic universe variable u /- We change the implicit arguments of in_tail and in_head. The goal is to allow us to create in_tail and in_head application using quotation without having information about the expected type. -/ lemma in_tail {α : Type u} {a : α} (b : α) {l : list α} : a ∈ l → a ∈ b::l := mem_cons_of_mem _ lemma in_head {α : Type u} (a : α) (l : list α) : a ∈ a::l := mem_cons_self _ _ lemma in_left {α : Type u} {a : α} {l : list α} (r : list α) : a ∈ l → a ∈ l ++ r := mem_append_left _ lemma in_right {α : Type u} {a : α} (l : list α) {r : list α} : a ∈ r → a ∈ l ++ r := mem_append_right _ /- The command `declare_trace` add a new trace.search_mem_list to Lean -/ declare_trace search_mem_list /- In Lean, we can only reference a function 'f' while defining 'f' when we use recursive equation compiler. This is true also for meta definitions. Thus, we cannot write a tactic such as meta def f : tactic unit := ... f ... that invokes itself but it is not defined using the equational compiler. We workaround this issue by defining it as meta def f : unit → tactic unit | () := ... f () ... -/ meta def mk_mem_list_rec : unit → tactic unit | () := when_tracing `search_mem_list (do t ← target, f ← pp t, trace (to_fmt "search " ++ f)) >> (assumption <|> /- The notation `[t] allows us to use the Lean "tactic interactive mode" inside regular tactic. In the following example `[apply in_left] is syntax sugar for tactic.interactive.apply `(in_left) -/ (`[apply in_left] >> mk_mem_list_rec ()) <|> (`[apply in_right] >> mk_mem_list_rec ()) <|> (`[apply in_head]) <|> (`[apply in_tail] >> mk_mem_list_rec ())) /- The tactic `now` fails if we still have goals to be solved -/ >> done meta def mk_mem_list : tactic unit := solve1 (mk_mem_list_rec ()) set_option trace.search_mem_list true example (a b c : nat) : a ∈ [b, c] ++ [b, a, b] := by mk_mem_list example (a b c : nat) : a ∈ [b, c] ++ [b, a+0, b] := by mk_mem_list example (a b c : nat) : a ∈ [b, c] ++ [b, c, c] ++ [b, a+0, b] := by mk_mem_list example (a b c : nat) (l : list nat) : a ∈ l → a ∈ [b, c] ++ b::l := begin intros, mk_mem_list end example (a b c : nat) (l₁ l₂ : list nat) : a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ b::b::c::l₂ ++ b::c::l₁ ++ [c, c, b] := begin intros, mk_mem_list end