/- Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE. Authors: Leonardo de Moura -/ prelude import init.trace init.meta.base_tactic init.meta.environment init.meta.qexpr meta_constant tactic_state : Type₁ namespace tactic_state meta_constant env : tactic_state → environment meta_constant to_format : tactic_state → format /- Format expression with respect to the main goal in the tactic state. If the tactic state does not contain any goals, then format expression using an empty local context. -/ meta_constant format_expr : tactic_state → expr → format end tactic_state meta_definition tactic_state.has_to_format [instance] : has_to_format tactic_state := has_to_format.mk tactic_state.to_format meta_definition tactic [reducible] (A : Type) := base_tactic tactic_state A namespace tactic open tactic_state meta_definition get_env : tactic environment := do s ← read, return (env s) meta_definition get_decl (n : name) : tactic declaration := do s ← read, returnex (environment.get (env s) n) meta_definition trace (s : string) : tactic unit := return (_root_.trace s (λ u, ())) meta_definition trace_fmt (fmt : format) : tactic unit := return (_root_.trace_fmt fmt (λ u, ())) /- Trace expression with respect to the main goal -/ meta_definition trace_expr (e : expr) : tactic unit := do s ← read, trace_fmt (format_expr s e) meta_definition trace_state : tactic unit := do s ← read, trace_fmt (to_fmt s) meta_definition format_expr (e : expr) : tactic format := do s ← read, return (tactic_state.format_expr s e) inductive transparency := | all | semireducible | reducible | none /- Return the partial term/proof constructed so far. Note that the resultant expression may contain variables that are not declarate in the current main goal. -/ meta_constant result : tactic expr /- Display the partial term/proof constructed so far. This tactic is *not* equivalent to do { r ← result, s ← read, return (format_expr s r) } because this one will format the result with respect to the current goal, and trace_result will do it with respect to the initial goal. -/ meta_constant format_result : tactic format /- Return target type of the main goal. Fail if tactic_state does not have any goal left. -/ meta_constant target : tactic expr meta_constant intro : name → tactic unit meta_constant intron : nat → tactic unit meta_constant rename : name → name → tactic unit meta_constant clear : name → tactic unit meta_constant revert_lst : list name → tactic unit meta_constant infer_type : expr → tactic expr meta_constant whnf : expr → tactic expr meta_constant unify_core : expr → expr → transparency → tactic bool meta_constant get_local : name → tactic expr /- Return the hypothesis in the main goal. Fail if tactic_state does not have any goal left. -/ meta_constant local_context : tactic (list expr) /- Helper tactic for creating simple applications where some arguments are inferred using type inference. Example, given rel.{l_1 l_2} : Pi (A : Type.{l_1}) (B : A -> Type.{l_2}), (Pi x : A, B x) -> (Pi x : A, B x) -> , Prop nat : Type.{1} real : Type.{1} vec.{l} : Pi (A : Type.{l}) (n : nat), Type.{l1} f g : Pi (n : nat), vec real n then mk_app "rel" [f, g] returns the application rel.{1 2} nat (fun n : nat, vec real n) f g -/ meta_constant mk_app : name → list expr → tactic expr /- Similar to mk_app, but allows to specify which arguments are explicit/implicit. Example, given a b : nat then mk_mapp "ite" [some (a > b), none, none, some a, some b] returns the application @ite.{1} (a > b) (nat.decidable_gt a b) nat a b -/ meta_constant mk_mapp : name → list (option expr) → tactic expr meta_constant subst : name → tactic unit meta_constant exact : expr → tactic unit /- Elaborate the given quoted expression with respect to the current main goal. -/ meta_constant to_expr : qexpr → tactic expr /- Try to create an instance of the given type class. -/ meta_constant mk_instance : expr → tactic expr /- Simplify the given expression using [defeq] lemmas. The resulting expression is definitionally equal to the input. -/ meta_constant defeq_simp : expr → tactic expr /- Change the target of the main goal. The input expression must be definitionally equal to the current target. -/ meta_constant change : expr → tactic unit /- (assert H T), adds a new goal for T, and the hypothesis (H : T := ?M) in the current goal -/ meta_constant assert : name → expr → tactic unit /- rotate goals to the left -/ meta_constant rotate_left : nat → tactic unit meta_constant get_goals : tactic (list expr) meta_constant set_goals : list expr → tactic unit meta_constant apply_core : expr → transparency → tactic unit meta_constant fapply_core : expr → transparency → tactic unit open list nat meta_definition intros : tactic unit := do t ← target, match t with | expr.pi _ _ _ _ := do intro "_", intros | expr.elet _ _ _ _ := do intro "_", intros | _ := skip end meta_definition intro_lst : list name → tactic unit | [] := skip | (n::ns) := do intro n, intro_lst ns meta_definition revert (n : name) : tactic unit := revert_lst [n] meta_definition clear_lst : list name → tactic unit | [] := skip | (n::ns) := do clear n, clear_lst ns meta_definition unify (a b : expr) : tactic bool := unify_core a b transparency.semireducible meta_definition get_local_type (n : name) : tactic expr := get_local n >>= infer_type meta_definition trace_result : tactic unit := format_result >>= trace_fmt open bool /- (find_same_type t es) tries to find in es an expression with type definitionally equal to t -/ meta_definition find_same_type : expr → list expr → tactic expr | e [] := failed | e (H :: Hs) := do t ← infer_type H, b ← unify e t, if b = tt then return H else find_same_type e Hs meta_definition assumption : tactic unit := do { ctx ← local_context, t ← target, H ← find_same_type t ctx, exact H } <|> fail "assumption tactic failed" meta_definition dsimp : tactic unit := target >>= defeq_simp >>= change /- Return the number of goals that need to be solved -/ meta_definition num_goals : tactic nat := do gs ← get_goals, return (length gs) /- We have to provide the instance argument `[has_mod nat]` because mod for nat was not defined yet -/ meta_definition rotate_right (n : nat) [has_mod nat] : tactic unit := do ng ← num_goals, if ng = 0 then skip else rotate_left (ng - n % ng) meta_definition rotate : nat → tactic unit := rotate_left meta_definition focus (tac : tactic unit) : tactic unit := do gs ← get_goals, match gs with | [] := fail "focus tactic failed, there isn't any goal left to focus" | (g::rs) := do set_goals [g], tac, gs' ← get_goals, match gs' with | [] := set_goals gs | _ := fail "focus tactic failed, focused goal has not been solved" end end private meta_definition all_goals_core : tactic unit → list expr → list expr → tactic unit | tac [] acc := set_goals acc | tac (g :: gs) acc := do set_goals [g], tac, new_gs ← get_goals, all_goals_core tac gs (acc ++ new_gs) meta_definition all_goals (tac : tactic unit) : tactic unit := do gs ← get_goals, all_goals_core tac gs [] meta_definition when (c : Prop) [decidable c] (tac : tactic unit) : tactic unit := if c then tac else skip meta_definition fail_if_no_goals : tactic unit := do n ← num_goals, when (n = 0) (fail "tactic failed, there are no goals to be solved") meta_definition now : tactic unit := do n ← num_goals, when (n ≠ 0) (fail "now tactic failed, there are unsolved goals") /- Swap first two goals, do nothing if tactic state does not have at least two goals -/ meta_definition swap : tactic unit := do gs ← get_goals, match gs with | g₁ :: g₂ :: rs := set_goals (g₂ :: g₁ :: rs) | _ := skip end meta_definition apply (e : expr) : tactic unit := apply_core e transparency.semireducible meta_definition fapply (e : expr) : tactic unit := fapply_core e transparency.semireducible end tactic