/- Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE. Authors: Leonardo de Moura We implement a crush-like strategy using simplifier, SMT gadgets, and robust simplifier. This is just a demo. -/ declare_trace mini_crush namespace mini_crush open tactic meta def size (e : expr) : nat := e^.fold 1 (λ e _ n, n+1) /- Collect relevant functions -/ meta def is_auto_construction : name → bool | (name.mk_string "brec_on" p) := tt | (name.mk_string "cases_on" p) := tt | (name.mk_string "rec_on" p) := tt | (name.mk_string "no_confusion" p) := tt | (name.mk_string "below" p) := tt | _ := ff meta def is_relevant_fn (n : name) : tactic bool := do env ← get_env, if ¬env^.is_definition n ∨ is_auto_construction n then return ff else if env^.in_current_file n then return tt else in_open_namespaces n meta def collect_revelant_fns_aux : name_set → expr → tactic name_set | s e := e^.mfold s $ λ t _ s, match t with | expr.const c _ := if s^.contains c then return s else mcond (is_relevant_fn c) (do new_s ← return $ if c^.is_internal then s else s^.insert c, d ← get_decl c, collect_revelant_fns_aux new_s d^.value) (return s) | _ := return s end meta def collect_revelant_fns : tactic name_set := do ctx ← local_context, s₁ ← ctx^.mfoldl (λ s e, infer_type e >>= collect_revelant_fns_aux s) mk_name_set, target >>= collect_revelant_fns_aux s₁ meta def add_relevant_eqns (s : simp_lemmas) : tactic simp_lemmas := do fns ← collect_revelant_fns, fns^.mfold s (λ fn s, get_eqn_lemmas_for tt fn >>= mfoldl simp_lemmas.add_simp s) meta def add_relevant_eqns_h (hs : hinst_lemmas) : tactic hinst_lemmas := do fns ← collect_revelant_fns, fns^.mfold hs (λ fn hs, get_eqn_lemmas_for tt fn >>= mfoldl (λ hs d, hs^.add <$> hinst_lemma.mk_from_decl d) hs) /- Collect terms that are inductive datatypes -/ meta def is_inductive (e : expr) : tactic bool := do type ← infer_type e, C ← return type^.get_app_fn, env ← get_env, return $ C^.is_constant && env^.is_inductive C^.const_name meta def collect_inductive_aux : expr_set → expr → tactic expr_set | S e := if S^.contains e then return S else do new_S ← mcond (is_inductive e) (return $ S^.insert e) (return S), match e with | expr.app _ _ := fold_explicit_args e new_S collect_inductive_aux | expr.pi _ _ d b := if e^.is_arrow then collect_inductive_aux S d >>= flip collect_inductive_aux b else return new_S | _ := return new_S end meta def collect_inductive : expr → tactic expr_set := collect_inductive_aux mk_expr_set meta def collect_inductive_from_target : tactic (list expr) := do S ← target >>= collect_inductive, return $ list.qsort (λ e₁ e₂, size e₁ < size e₂) $ S^.to_list meta def collect_inductive_hyps : tactic (list expr) := local_context >>= mfoldl (λ r h, mcond (is_inductive h) (return $ h::r) (return r)) [] /- Induction -/ meta def try_induction_aux (cont : expr → tactic unit) : list expr → tactic unit | [] := failed | (e::es) := (step (induction e); cont e; now) <|> try_induction_aux es meta def try_induction (cont : expr → tactic unit) : tactic unit := focus1 $ collect_inductive_hyps >>= try_induction_aux cont /- Trace messages -/ meta def report {α : Type} [has_to_tactic_format α] (a : α) : tactic unit := when_tracing `mini_crush $ trace a meta def report_failure (s : name) (e : option expr := none) : tactic unit := when_tracing `mini_crush $ match e with | none := trace ("FAILED '" ++ to_string s ++ "' at") | some e := (do p ← pp e, trace (to_fmt "FAILED '" ++ to_fmt s ++ "' processing '" ++ p ++ to_fmt "' at")) <|> trace ("FAILED '" ++ to_string s ++ "' at") end >> trace_state >> trace "--------------" /- Simple tactic -/ meta def close_aux (hs : hinst_lemmas) : tactic unit := triv <|> reflexivity reducible <|> contradiction <|> try_for 100 (rsimp {} hs >> now) <|> try_for 100 reflexivity meta def close (hs : hinst_lemmas) (s : name) (e : option expr) : tactic unit := now <|> close_aux hs <|> report_failure s e >> failed meta def simple (s : simp_lemmas) (hs : hinst_lemmas) (cfg : simp_config) (s_name : name) (h : option expr) : tactic unit := simph_intros_using s cfg >> close hs s_name h /- Best first search -/ meta def snapshot := tactic_state meta def save : tactic snapshot := tactic.read meta def restore : snapshot → tactic unit := tactic.write meta def try_snapshots {α} (cont : α → tactic unit) : list (α × snapshot) → tactic unit | [] := failed | ((a, s)::ss) := (restore s >> cont a >> now) <|> try_snapshots ss meta def search {α} (max_depth : nat) (act : nat → α → tactic (list (α × snapshot))) : nat → α → tactic unit | n s := do now <|> if n > max_depth then when_tracing `mini_crush (trace "max depth reached" >> trace_state) >> failed else all_goals $ try intros >> act n s >>= try_snapshots (search (n+1)) meta def try_and_save {α} (t : tactic α) : tactic (option (α × nat × snapshot)) := do { s ← save, a ← t, new_s ← save, n ← num_goals, restore s, return (a, n, new_s) } <|> return none meta def try_all_aux {α β : Type} (ts : α → tactic β) : list α → list (α × β × nat × snapshot) → tactic (list (α × β × nat × snapshot)) | [] [] := failed | [] rs := return rs^.reverse | (v::vs) rs := do r ← try_and_save (ts v), match r with | some (b, 0, s) := return [(v, b, 0, s)] | some (b, n, s) := try_all_aux vs ((v, b, n, s)::rs) | none := try_all_aux vs rs end meta def try_all {α β : Type} (ts : α → tactic β) (vs : list α) : tactic (list (α × β × nat × snapshot)) := try_all_aux ts vs [] /- Destruct and simplify -/ meta def try_cases (s : simp_lemmas) (hs : hinst_lemmas) (cfg : simp_config) (s_name : name) : tactic (list (unit × snapshot)) := do es ← collect_inductive_from_target, rs ← try_all (λ e, do when_tracing `mini_crush (do p ← pp e, trace (to_fmt "Splitting on '" ++ p ++ to_fmt "'")), cases e; simph_intros_using s cfg; try (close_aux hs)) es, rs ← return $ flip list.qsort rs (λ ⟨e₁, _, n₁, _⟩ ⟨e₂, _, n₂, _⟩, if n₁ ≠ n₂ then n₁ < n₂ else size e₁ < size e₂), return $ rs^.map (λ ⟨_, _, _, s⟩, ((), s)) meta def search_cases (max_depth : nat) (s : simp_lemmas) (hs : hinst_lemmas) (cfg : simp_config) (s_name : name) : tactic unit := search max_depth (λ d _, do when_tracing `mini_crush (trace ("Depth #" ++ to_string d)), try_cases s hs cfg s_name) 0 () /- Strategies -/ meta def mk_simp_lemmas (s : option simp_lemmas := none) : tactic simp_lemmas := match s with | some s := return s | none := simp_lemmas.mk_default >>= add_relevant_eqns end meta def mk_hinst_lemmas (s : option hinst_lemmas := none) : tactic hinst_lemmas := match s with | some s := return s | none := add_relevant_eqns_h hinst_lemmas.mk end meta def strategy_1 (cfg : simp_config := {}) (s : option simp_lemmas := none) (hs : option hinst_lemmas := none) (s_name : name := "strategy 1") : tactic unit := do s ← mk_simp_lemmas s, hs ← mk_hinst_lemmas hs, try_induction (λ h, simple s hs cfg s_name (some h)) meta def strategy_2_aux (cfg : simp_config) (hs : hinst_lemmas) : simp_lemmas → tactic unit | s := do s ← simp_intro_aux cfg tt s tt [`_], -- Introduce next hypothesis h ← list.ilast <$> local_context, try $ solve1 (mwhen (is_inductive h) $ induction' h; simple s hs cfg "strategy 2" (some h)), now <|> strategy_2_aux s meta def strategy_2 (cfg : simp_config := {}) (s : option simp_lemmas := none) (hs : option hinst_lemmas := none) : tactic unit := do s ← mk_simp_lemmas s, hs ← mk_hinst_lemmas hs, strategy_2_aux cfg hs s meta def strategy_3 (cfg : simp_config := {}) (max_depth : nat := 1) (s : option simp_lemmas := none) (hs : option hinst_lemmas := none) : tactic unit := do s ← mk_simp_lemmas s, hs ← mk_hinst_lemmas hs, try_induction (λ h, try (simph_intros_using s cfg); try (close_aux hs); (now <|> search_cases max_depth s hs cfg "strategy 3")) end mini_crush open tactic mini_crush meta def mini_crush (cfg : simp_config := {}) (max_depth : nat := 1) := do s ← mk_simp_lemmas, hs ← mk_hinst_lemmas, strategy_1 cfg (some s) (some hs) <|> strategy_2 cfg (some s) (some hs) <|> strategy_3 cfg max_depth (some s) (some hs)