lean4-htt/tests/elab/grind_list_find.lean
Garmelon 08eb78a5b2
chore: switch to new test/bench suite (#12590)
This PR sets up the new integrated test/bench suite. It then migrates
all benchmarks and some related tests to the new suite. There's also
some documentation and some linting.

For now, a lot of the old tests are left alone so this PR doesn't become
even larger than it already is. Eventually, all tests should be migrated
to the new suite though so there isn't a confusing mix of two systems.
2026-02-25 13:51:53 +00:00

58 lines
2.5 KiB
Text
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

module
open List
theorem findSome?_eq_none_iff : findSome? p l = none ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, p x = none := by
induction l with grind
theorem findSome?_isSome_iff {f : α → Option β} {l : List α} :
(l.findSome? f).isSome ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ l ∧ (f x).isSome := by
induction l with grind
attribute [grind! ←] Option.isSome_iff_ne_none -- Can we add this?
theorem Sublist.findSome?_eq_none {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) :
l₂.findSome? f = none → l₁.findSome? f = none := by
grind
theorem IsPrefix.findSome?_eq_none {l₁ l₂ : List α} {f : α → Option β} (h : l₁ <+: l₂) :
List.findSome? f l₂ = none → List.findSome? f l₁ = none := by
grind
theorem find?_flatten_eq_none_iff {xs : List (List α)} {p : α → Bool} :
xs.flatten.find? p = none ↔ ∀ ys ∈ xs, ∀ x ∈ ys, !p x := by
grind
theorem find?_flatMap_eq_none_iff {xs : List α} {f : α → List β} {p : β → Bool} :
(xs.flatMap f).find? p = none ↔ ∀ x ∈ xs, ∀ y ∈ f x, !p y := by
grind
theorem find?_replicate_eq_some_iff {n : Nat} {a b : α} {p : α → Bool} :
(replicate n a).find? p = some b ↔ n ≠ 0 ∧ p a ∧ a = b := by
grind
macro_rules | `(tactic| get_elem_tactic_extensible) => `(tactic| grind)
example (xs : List Nat) (h : 3 ∈ xs) : (xs.find? (· ≤ 5)).isSome := by grind
example (xs : List Nat) (h : 3 ∈ xs) : xs.findIdx (· ≤ 5) < xs.length := by grind
example (xs : List Nat) (h : 3 ∈ xs) : xs[xs.findIdx (· ≤ 5)] < 7 := by grind
example (xs : List Nat) (h : 3 ∈ xs) : xs[xs.findIdx (· ≤ 5)] < 5 + xs.length := by grind
example (xs : List Nat) (h : 3 ∈ xs) : xs[xs.findIdx (· ≤ 5)] = 4 → 2 ≤ xs.length := by
grind [cases List]
example (xs : List Nat) (h : ∀ x, x ∈ xs → x > 7) : xs.find? (· ≤ 5) = none := by grind
example (xs : List Nat) (h : ∀ x, x ∈ xs → x > 7) : xs.findIdx (· ≤ 5) = xs.length := by grind
-- The following two theorems are abusing `grind`.
-- They instantiate the local hypothesis using `j < i` and `j ≤ i` as the patterns.
theorem le_findIdx_of_not {p : α → Bool} {xs : List α} {i : Nat} (h : i < xs.length)
(h2 : ∀ j (hji : j < i), p (xs[j]'(Nat.lt_trans hji h)) = false) : i ≤ xs.findIdx p := by
grind
theorem lt_findIdx_of_not {p : α → Bool} {xs : List α} {i : Nat} (h : i < xs.length)
(h2 : ∀ j (hji : j ≤ i), ¬p (xs[j]'(Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt hji h))) : i < xs.findIdx p := by
grind
theorem Sublist.findIdx?_isSome {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) :
(l₁.findIdx? p).isSome → (l₂.findIdx? p).isSome := by
grind