lean4-htt/tests/lean/ppDeepTerms.lean.expected.out
Kyle Miller 08e149de15 fix: make omission syntax be a builtin syntax (part 2)
Re-enables `⋯` processing that was disabled during the move to a builtin.
Adds tests.
2024-02-28 09:23:17 +01:00

10 lines
855 B
Text

Nat.succ (Nat.succ (Nat.succ (Nat.succ (Nat.succ (Nat.succ (Nat.succ (Nat.succ Nat.zero))))))) : Nat
Nat.succ
(Nat.succ (Nat.succ (Nat.succ (Nat.succ (Nat.succ (Nat.succ (Nat.succ (Nat.succ (Nat.succ Nat.zero))))))))) : Nat
Nat.succ (Nat.succ (Nat.succ (Nat.succ (Nat.succ (Nat.succ (Nat.succ (Nat.succ (Nat.succ ⋯)))))))) : Nat
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8] : List Nat
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, ⋯] : List Nat
ppDeepTerms.lean:39:32-39:33: warning: The '⋯' token is used by the pretty printer to indicate omitted terms, and it should not be used directly. It logs this warning and then elaborates like `_`.
The presence of `⋯` in pretty printing output is controlled by the 'pp.deepTerms' and `pp.proofs` options. These options can be further adjusted using `pp.deepTerms.threshold` and `pp.proofs.threshold`.
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, ?m] : List Nat