This PR modifies the app elaborator to beta reduce arguments while substituting them into expected types for later arguments. This makes it consistent with `inferType` and `instantiateMVars`, which both beta reduce substitutions. In particular, this change ensures that the app elaborator behaves as if it creates metavariables for each parameter and assigns elaborated arguments to the metavariables. **Breaking change:** tactic proofs may need to be modified to remove unnecessary steps, e.g. `dsimp only` steps that were previously for beta reductions.
381 lines
14 KiB
Text
381 lines
14 KiB
Text
/-
|
||
Copyright (c) 2025 Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
|
||
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
|
||
Authors: Kim Morrison
|
||
-/
|
||
module
|
||
|
||
prelude
|
||
public import Init.Grind.Ordered.Module
|
||
import all Init.Data.AC
|
||
import Init.Omega
|
||
import Init.RCases
|
||
|
||
public section
|
||
|
||
open Std
|
||
|
||
namespace Lean.Grind.IntModule
|
||
|
||
namespace OfNatModule
|
||
variable (α : Type u)
|
||
variable [NatModule α]
|
||
|
||
-- Helper instance for `ac_rfl`
|
||
local instance : Std.Associative (· + · : α → α → α) where
|
||
assoc := AddCommMonoid.add_assoc
|
||
local instance : Std.Commutative (· + · : α → α → α) where
|
||
comm := AddCommMonoid.add_comm
|
||
|
||
@[local simp] private theorem exists_true : ∃ (_ : α), True := ⟨0, trivial⟩
|
||
|
||
@[local simp] def r : (α × α) → (α × α) → Prop
|
||
| (a, b), (c, d) => ∃ k, a + d + k = b + c + k
|
||
|
||
def Q := Quot (r α)
|
||
|
||
variable {α}
|
||
|
||
theorem r_rfl (a : α × α) : r α a a := by
|
||
cases a; refine ⟨0, ?_⟩; simp [AddCommMonoid.add_zero]; ac_rfl
|
||
|
||
theorem r_sym {a b : α × α} : r α a b → r α b a := by
|
||
cases a; cases b; simp [r]; intro h w; refine ⟨h, ?_⟩; simp [w, AddCommMonoid.add_comm]
|
||
|
||
theorem r_trans {a b c : α × α} : r α a b → r α b c → r α a c := by
|
||
obtain ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ := a; obtain ⟨b₁, b₂⟩ := b; obtain ⟨c₁, c₂⟩ := c
|
||
simp [r]
|
||
intro k₁ h₁ k₂ h₂
|
||
refine ⟨(k₁ + k₂ + b₁ + b₂), ?_⟩
|
||
replace h₁ := congrArg (· + (b₁ + c₂ + k₂)) h₁; try simp at h₁ -- TODO(kmill) remove simp after stage0 update
|
||
have haux₁ : a₁ + b₂ + k₁ + (b₁ + c₂ + k₂) = (a₁ + c₂) + (k₁ + k₂ + b₁ + b₂) := by ac_rfl
|
||
have haux₂ : a₂ + b₁ + k₁ + (b₁ + c₂ + k₂) = (a₂ + c₁) + (k₁ + k₂ + b₁ + b₂) := by rw [h₂]; ac_rfl
|
||
rw [haux₁, haux₂] at h₁
|
||
exact h₁
|
||
|
||
def Q.mk (p : α × α) : Q α :=
|
||
Quot.mk (r α) p
|
||
|
||
def Q.liftOn₂ (q₁ q₂ : Q α)
|
||
(f : α × α → α × α → β)
|
||
(h : ∀ {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂}, r α a₁ a₂ → r α b₁ b₂ → f a₁ b₁ = f a₂ b₂)
|
||
: β := by
|
||
apply Quot.lift (fun (a₁ : α × α) => Quot.lift (f a₁)
|
||
(fun (a b : α × α) => @h a₁ a a₁ b (r_rfl a₁)) q₂) _ q₁
|
||
intros
|
||
induction q₂ using Quot.ind
|
||
apply h; assumption; apply r_rfl
|
||
|
||
attribute [local simp] Q.mk Q.liftOn₂ AddCommMonoid.add_zero
|
||
|
||
def Q.ind {β : Q α → Prop} (mk : ∀ (a : α × α), β (Q.mk a)) (q : Q α) : β q :=
|
||
Quot.ind mk q
|
||
|
||
@[local simp] def nsmul (n : Nat) (q : Q α) : (Q α) :=
|
||
q.liftOn (fun (a, b) => Q.mk (n • a, n • b))
|
||
(by intro (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂)
|
||
simp; intro k h; apply Quot.sound; simp
|
||
refine ⟨n • k, ?_⟩
|
||
replace h := congrArg (fun x : α => n • x) h
|
||
simpa [NatModule.nsmul_add] using h)
|
||
|
||
@[local simp] def zsmul (n : Int) (q : Q α) : (Q α) :=
|
||
q.liftOn (fun (a, b) => if n < 0 then Q.mk (n.natAbs • b, n.natAbs • a) else Q.mk (n.natAbs • a, n.natAbs • b))
|
||
(by intro (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂)
|
||
simp; intro k h;
|
||
split
|
||
· apply Quot.sound; simp
|
||
refine ⟨n.natAbs • k, ?_⟩
|
||
replace h := congrArg (fun x : α => n.natAbs • x) h
|
||
simpa [NatModule.nsmul_add] using h.symm
|
||
· apply Quot.sound; simp
|
||
refine ⟨n.natAbs • k, ?_⟩
|
||
replace h := congrArg (fun x : α => n.natAbs • x) h
|
||
simpa [NatModule.nsmul_add] using h)
|
||
|
||
@[local simp] def sub (q₁ q₂ : Q α) : Q α :=
|
||
Q.liftOn₂ q₁ q₂ (fun (a, b) (c, d) => Q.mk (a + d, c + b))
|
||
(by intro (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂) (a₃, b₃) (a₄, b₄)
|
||
simp; intro k₁ h₁ k₂ h₂; apply Quot.sound; simp
|
||
refine ⟨k₁ + k₂, ?_⟩
|
||
have : a₁ + b₂ + (a₄ + b₃) + (k₁ + k₂) = a₁ + b₃ + k₁ + (b₂ + a₄ + k₂) := by ac_rfl
|
||
rw [this, h₁, ← h₂]
|
||
ac_rfl)
|
||
|
||
@[local simp] def add (q₁ q₂ : Q α) : Q α :=
|
||
Q.liftOn₂ q₁ q₂ (fun (a, b) (c, d) => Q.mk (a + c, b + d))
|
||
(by intro (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂) (a₃, b₃) (a₄, b₄)
|
||
simp; intro k₁ h₁ k₂ h₂; apply Quot.sound; simp
|
||
refine ⟨k₁ + k₂, ?_⟩
|
||
have : a₁ + a₂ + (b₃ + b₄) + (k₁ + k₂) = a₁ + b₃ + k₁ + (a₂ + b₄ + k₂) := by ac_rfl
|
||
rw [this, h₁, h₂]
|
||
ac_rfl)
|
||
|
||
@[local simp] def neg (q : Q α) : Q α :=
|
||
q.liftOn (fun (a, b) => Q.mk (b, a))
|
||
(by intro (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂)
|
||
simp; intro k h; apply Quot.sound; simp
|
||
exact ⟨k, h.symm⟩)
|
||
|
||
attribute [local simp]
|
||
Quot.liftOn AddCommMonoid.add_zero AddCommMonoid.zero_add NatModule.one_nsmul NatModule.zero_nsmul NatModule.nsmul_zero
|
||
NatModule.nsmul_add NatModule.add_nsmul
|
||
|
||
@[local simp] def zero : Q α :=
|
||
Q.mk (0, 0)
|
||
|
||
theorem neg_add_cancel (a : Q α) : add (neg a) a = zero := by
|
||
obtain ⟨⟨_, _⟩⟩ := a
|
||
simp
|
||
apply Quot.sound; simp; refine ⟨0, ?_⟩; ac_rfl
|
||
|
||
theorem add_comm (a b : Q α) : add a b = add b a := by
|
||
obtain ⟨⟨_, _⟩⟩ := a
|
||
obtain ⟨⟨_, _⟩⟩ := b
|
||
simp; apply Quot.sound; simp; refine ⟨0, ?_⟩; ac_rfl
|
||
|
||
theorem add_zero (a : Q α) : add a zero = a := by
|
||
induction a using Quot.ind
|
||
next a => cases a; simp
|
||
|
||
theorem add_assoc (a b c : Q α) : add (add a b) c = add a (add b c) := by
|
||
obtain ⟨⟨_, _⟩⟩ := a
|
||
obtain ⟨⟨_, _⟩⟩ := b
|
||
obtain ⟨⟨_, _⟩⟩ := c
|
||
simp; apply Quot.sound; simp; refine ⟨0, ?_⟩; ac_rfl
|
||
|
||
theorem sub_eq_add_neg (a b : Q α) : sub a b = add a (neg b) := by
|
||
obtain ⟨⟨_, _⟩⟩ := a
|
||
obtain ⟨⟨_, _⟩⟩ := b
|
||
simp; apply Quot.sound; simp; refine ⟨0, ?_⟩; ac_rfl
|
||
|
||
theorem one_zsmul (a : Q α) : zsmul 1 a = a := by
|
||
induction a using Quot.ind
|
||
next a => cases a; simp
|
||
|
||
theorem zero_zsmul (a : Q α) : zsmul 0 a = zero := by
|
||
induction a using Quot.ind
|
||
next a => cases a; simp
|
||
|
||
theorem add_zsmul (a b : Int) (c : Q α) : zsmul (a + b) c = add (zsmul a c) (zsmul b c) := by
|
||
induction c using Q.ind with | _ c
|
||
rcases c with ⟨c₁, c₂⟩; simp
|
||
by_cases hb : b < 0
|
||
· simp only [if_pos hb]
|
||
by_cases ha : a < 0
|
||
· simp only [if_pos ha]
|
||
rw [if_pos (by omega)]
|
||
apply Quot.sound
|
||
refine ⟨0, ?_⟩
|
||
rw [Int.natAbs_add_of_nonpos (by omega) (by omega), NatModule.add_nsmul, NatModule.add_nsmul]
|
||
ac_rfl
|
||
· split
|
||
· apply Quot.sound
|
||
refine ⟨a.natAbs • c₁ + a.natAbs • c₂, ?_⟩
|
||
have : (a + b).natAbs + a.natAbs = b.natAbs := by omega
|
||
simp [← this]
|
||
ac_rfl
|
||
· apply Quot.sound
|
||
refine ⟨b.natAbs • c₁ + b.natAbs • c₂, ?_⟩
|
||
have : (a + b).natAbs + b.natAbs = a.natAbs := by omega
|
||
simp [← this]
|
||
ac_rfl
|
||
· simp only [if_neg hb]
|
||
by_cases ha : a < 0
|
||
· split
|
||
· apply Quot.sound
|
||
refine ⟨a.natAbs • c₁ + a.natAbs • c₂, ?_⟩
|
||
have : (a + b).natAbs + b.natAbs = a.natAbs := by omega
|
||
simp [← this]
|
||
ac_rfl
|
||
· apply Quot.sound
|
||
refine ⟨b.natAbs • c₁ + b.natAbs • c₂, ?_⟩
|
||
have : (a + b).natAbs + a.natAbs = b.natAbs := by omega
|
||
simp [← this]
|
||
ac_rfl
|
||
· simp only [if_neg ha]
|
||
rw [if_neg (by omega)]
|
||
apply Quot.sound
|
||
refine ⟨0, ?_⟩
|
||
rw [Int.natAbs_add_of_nonneg (by omega) (by omega), NatModule.add_nsmul, NatModule.add_nsmul]
|
||
ac_rfl
|
||
|
||
theorem zsmul_natCast_eq_nsmul (n : Nat) (a : Q α) : zsmul (n : Int) a = nsmul n a := by
|
||
induction a using Q.ind with | _ a
|
||
rcases a with ⟨a₁, a₂⟩; simp; omega
|
||
|
||
@[implicit_reducible]
|
||
def ofNatModule : IntModule (Q α) := {
|
||
nsmul := ⟨nsmul⟩,
|
||
zsmul := ⟨zsmul⟩,
|
||
zero,
|
||
add, sub, neg,
|
||
add_comm, add_assoc, add_zero,
|
||
neg_add_cancel, sub_eq_add_neg,
|
||
one_zsmul, zero_zsmul, add_zsmul,
|
||
zsmul_natCast_eq_nsmul
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
attribute [instance] ofNatModule
|
||
|
||
@[local simp] def toQ (a : α) : Q α :=
|
||
Q.mk (a, 0)
|
||
|
||
/-! Embedding theorems -/
|
||
|
||
theorem toQ_add (a b : α) : toQ (a + b) = toQ a + toQ b := by
|
||
simp; apply Quot.sound; simp
|
||
|
||
theorem toQ_zero : toQ (0 : α) = 0 := by
|
||
simp; apply Quot.sound; simp
|
||
|
||
theorem toQ_smul (n : Nat) (a : α) : toQ (n • a) = n • toQ a := by
|
||
simp; apply Quot.sound; simp
|
||
|
||
/-!
|
||
Helper definitions and theorems for proving `toQ` is injective when
|
||
`CommSemiring` has the right_cancel property
|
||
-/
|
||
|
||
private def rel (h : Equivalence (r α)) (q₁ q₂ : Q α) : Prop :=
|
||
Q.liftOn₂ q₁ q₂
|
||
(fun a₁ a₂ => r α a₁ a₂)
|
||
(by intro a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ h₁ h₂
|
||
simp [-r]; constructor
|
||
next => intro h₃; exact h.trans (h.symm h₁) (h.trans h₃ h₂)
|
||
next => intro h₃; exact h.trans h₁ (h.trans h₃ (h.symm h₂)))
|
||
|
||
private theorem rel_rfl (h : Equivalence (r α)) (q : Q α) : rel h q q := by
|
||
induction q using Quot.ind
|
||
simp [rel, AddCommMonoid.add_comm]
|
||
|
||
private theorem helper (h : Equivalence (r α)) (q₁ q₂ : Q α) : q₁ = q₂ → rel h q₁ q₂ := by
|
||
intro h; subst q₁; apply rel_rfl h
|
||
|
||
theorem Q.exact : Q.mk a = Q.mk b → r α a b := by
|
||
apply helper
|
||
constructor; exact r_rfl; exact r_sym; exact r_trans
|
||
|
||
-- If the `NatModule` has the `AddRightCancel` property then `toQ` is injective
|
||
theorem toQ_inj [AddRightCancel α] {a b : α} : toQ a = toQ b → a = b := by
|
||
simp; intro h₁
|
||
replace h₁ := Q.exact h₁
|
||
simp at h₁
|
||
obtain ⟨k, h₁⟩ := h₁
|
||
exact AddRightCancel.add_right_cancel a b k h₁
|
||
|
||
instance [NatModule α] [AddRightCancel α] [NoNatZeroDivisors α] : NoNatZeroDivisors (OfNatModule.Q α) where
|
||
no_nat_zero_divisors := by
|
||
intro k a b h₁ h₂
|
||
replace h₂ : k • a = k • b := h₂
|
||
obtain ⟨⟨a₁, a₂⟩⟩ := a
|
||
obtain ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩⟩ := b
|
||
replace h₂ := Q.exact h₂
|
||
simp [r] at h₂
|
||
rcases h₂ with ⟨k', h₂⟩
|
||
replace h₂ := AddRightCancel.add_right_cancel _ _ _ h₂
|
||
simp [← NatModule.nsmul_add] at h₂
|
||
replace h₂ := NoNatZeroDivisors.no_nat_zero_divisors k (a₁ + b₂) (a₂ + b₁) h₁ h₂
|
||
apply Quot.sound; simp [r]; exists 0; simp [h₂]
|
||
|
||
instance [LE α] [IsPreorder α] [OrderedAdd α] : LE (OfNatModule.Q α) where
|
||
le a b := Q.liftOn₂ a b (fun (a, b) (c, d) => a + d ≤ b + c)
|
||
(by intro (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂) (a₃, b₃) (a₄, b₄)
|
||
simp; intro k₁ h₁ k₂ h₂
|
||
rw [OrderedAdd.add_le_left_iff (b₃ + k₁)]
|
||
have : a₁ + b₂ + (b₃ + k₁) = a₁ + b₃ + k₁ + b₂ := by ac_rfl
|
||
rw [this, h₁]; clear this
|
||
rw [OrderedAdd.add_le_left_iff (a₄ + k₂)]
|
||
have : b₁ + a₃ + k₁ + b₂ + (a₄ + k₂) = b₂ + a₄ + k₂ + b₁ + a₃ + k₁ := by ac_rfl
|
||
rw [this, ← h₂]; clear this
|
||
have : a₂ + b₄ + k₂ + b₁ + a₃ + k₁ = a₃ + b₄ + (a₂ + b₁ + k₁ + k₂) := by ac_rfl
|
||
rw [this]; clear this
|
||
have : b₁ + a₂ + (b₃ + k₁) + (a₄ + k₂) = b₃ + a₄ + (a₂ + b₁ + k₁ + k₂) := by ac_rfl
|
||
rw [this]; clear this
|
||
rw [← OrderedAdd.add_le_left_iff])
|
||
|
||
instance [LE α] [IsPreorder α] [OrderedAdd α] : LT (OfNatModule.Q α) where
|
||
lt a b := a ≤ b ∧ ¬b ≤ a
|
||
|
||
@[local simp] theorem mk_le_mk [LE α] [IsPreorder α] [OrderedAdd α] {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α} :
|
||
Q.mk (a₁, a₂) ≤ Q.mk (b₁, b₂) ↔ a₁ + b₂ ≤ a₂ + b₁ := by
|
||
rfl
|
||
|
||
instance [LE α] [IsPreorder α] [OrderedAdd α] : IsPreorder (OfNatModule.Q α) where
|
||
le_refl a := by
|
||
obtain ⟨⟨a₁, a₂⟩⟩ := a
|
||
change Q.mk _ ≤ Q.mk _
|
||
simp only [mk_le_mk]
|
||
simp [AddCommMonoid.add_comm]
|
||
le_trans {a b c} h₁ h₂ := by
|
||
induction a using Q.ind with | _ a
|
||
induction b using Q.ind with | _ b
|
||
induction c using Q.ind with | _ c
|
||
rcases a with ⟨a₁, a₂⟩; rcases b with ⟨b₁, b₂⟩; rcases c with ⟨c₁, c₂⟩
|
||
simp only [mk_le_mk] at h₁ h₂ ⊢
|
||
rw [OrderedAdd.add_le_left_iff (b₁ + b₂)]
|
||
have : a₁ + c₂ + (b₁ + b₂) = a₁ + b₂ + (b₁ + c₂) := by ac_rfl
|
||
rw [this]; clear this
|
||
have : a₂ + c₁ + (b₁ + b₂) = a₂ + b₁ + (b₂ + c₁) := by ac_rfl
|
||
rw [this]; clear this
|
||
exact OrderedAdd.add_le_add h₁ h₂
|
||
|
||
instance [LE α] [IsPartialOrder α] [OrderedAdd α] : IsPartialOrder (OfNatModule.Q α) where
|
||
le_antisymm a b h₁ h₂ := by
|
||
induction a using Q.ind with | _ a
|
||
induction b using Q.ind with | _ b
|
||
rcases a with ⟨a₁, a₂⟩; rcases b with ⟨b₁, b₂⟩
|
||
simp only [mk_le_mk] at h₁ h₂
|
||
rw [AddCommMonoid.add_comm b₁ a₂, AddCommMonoid.add_comm b₂ a₁] at h₂
|
||
have := IsPartialOrder.le_antisymm _ _ h₁ h₂
|
||
apply Quot.sound
|
||
simp; exists 0
|
||
rw [this]
|
||
|
||
instance [LE α] [IsLinearPreorder α] [OrderedAdd α] : IsLinearPreorder (OfNatModule.Q α) where
|
||
le_total a b := by
|
||
induction a using Q.ind with | _ a
|
||
induction b using Q.ind with | _ b
|
||
rcases a with ⟨a₁, a₂⟩; rcases b with ⟨b₁, b₂⟩
|
||
simp only [mk_le_mk]
|
||
rw [AddCommMonoid.add_comm b₁ a₂, AddCommMonoid.add_comm b₂ a₁]
|
||
apply le_total
|
||
|
||
instance [LE α] [IsLinearOrder α] [OrderedAdd α] : IsLinearOrder (OfNatModule.Q α) where
|
||
|
||
attribute [-simp] Q.mk
|
||
|
||
@[local simp] private theorem mk_lt_mk
|
||
[LE α] [LT α] [LawfulOrderLT α] [IsPreorder α] [OrderedAdd α] {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : α} :
|
||
Q.mk (a₁, a₂) < Q.mk (b₁, b₂) ↔ a₁ + b₂ < a₂ + b₁ := by
|
||
simp [lt_iff_le_and_not_ge, AddCommMonoid.add_comm]
|
||
|
||
@[local simp] private theorem mk_pos
|
||
[LE α] [LT α] [LawfulOrderLT α] [IsPreorder α] [OrderedAdd α] {a₁ a₂ : α} :
|
||
0 < Q.mk (a₁, a₂) ↔ a₂ < a₁ := by
|
||
change Q.mk (0,0) < _ ↔ _
|
||
simp [mk_lt_mk, AddCommMonoid.zero_add]
|
||
|
||
@[local simp]
|
||
theorem toQ_le [LE α] [IsPreorder α] [OrderedAdd α] {a b : α} : toQ a ≤ toQ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
|
||
simp
|
||
|
||
@[local simp]
|
||
theorem toQ_lt [LE α] [LT α] [LawfulOrderLT α] [IsPreorder α] [OrderedAdd α] {a b : α} : toQ a < toQ b ↔ a < b := by
|
||
simp [lt_iff_le_and_not_ge]
|
||
|
||
instance [LE α] [IsPreorder α] [OrderedAdd α] : OrderedAdd (OfNatModule.Q α) where
|
||
add_le_left_iff := by
|
||
intro a b c
|
||
obtain ⟨⟨a₁, a₂⟩⟩ := a
|
||
obtain ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩⟩ := b
|
||
obtain ⟨⟨c₁, c₂⟩⟩ := c
|
||
change a₁ + b₂ ≤ a₂ + b₁ ↔ (a₁ + c₁) + _ ≤ _
|
||
have : a₁ + c₁ + (b₂ + c₂) = a₁ + b₂ + (c₁ + c₂) := by ac_rfl
|
||
rw [this]; clear this
|
||
have : a₂ + c₂ + (b₁ + c₁) = a₂ + b₁ + (c₁ + c₂) := by ac_rfl
|
||
rw [this]; clear this
|
||
rw [← OrderedAdd.add_le_left_iff]
|
||
|
||
end OfNatModule
|
||
end Lean.Grind.IntModule
|