lean4-htt/tests/lean/grind/grind_ite_funinduction.lean
Kim Morrison cf35e13c60
feat: use fun_induction in if-normalization example (#8129)
This PR updates the If-Normalization example, to separately give an
implementation and subsequently prove the spec (using fun_induction),
instead of previously building a term in the subtype directly. At the
same time, adds a (failing) `grind` test case illustrating a problem
with unused match witnesses.
2025-04-27 12:27:17 +00:00

197 lines
6.7 KiB
Text
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

import Std.Data.HashMap.Lemmas
/-!
# If normalization
Rustan Leino, Stephan Merz, and Natarajan Shankar have recently been discussing challenge problems
to compare proof assistants.
(See https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/Rustan's.20challenge)
Their first suggestion was "if-normalization".
Here we state the problem in the Lean,
and then construct a clean solution where all verification work is done by `grind`.
(This solution builds upon an earlier solution by Chris Hughes, which had less automation
but made use of the powerful termination checker.)
-/
/-- An if-expression is either boolean literal, a numbered variable,
or an if-then-else expression where each subexpression is an if-expression. -/
inductive IfExpr
| lit : Bool → IfExpr
| var : Nat → IfExpr
| ite : IfExpr → IfExpr → IfExpr → IfExpr
deriving DecidableEq, Repr
namespace IfExpr
/--
An if-expression has a "nested if" if it contains
an if-then-else where the "if" is itself an if-then-else.
-/
def hasNestedIf : IfExpr → Bool
| lit _ => false
| var _ => false
| ite (ite _ _ _) _ _ => true
| ite _ t e => t.hasNestedIf || e.hasNestedIf
/--
An if-expression has a "constant if" if it contains
an if-then-else where the "if" is itself a literal.
-/
def hasConstantIf : IfExpr → Bool
| lit _ => false
| var _ => false
| ite (lit _) _ _ => true
| ite i t e => i.hasConstantIf || t.hasConstantIf || e.hasConstantIf
/--
An if-expression has a "redundant if" if it contains
an if-then-else where the "then" and "else" clauses are identical.
-/
def hasRedundantIf : IfExpr → Bool
| lit _ => false
| var _ => false
| ite i t e => t == e || i.hasRedundantIf || t.hasRedundantIf || e.hasRedundantIf
/--
All the variables appearing in an if-expressions, read left to right, without removing duplicates.
-/
def vars : IfExpr → List Nat
| lit _ => []
| var i => [i]
| ite i t e => i.vars ++ t.vars ++ e.vars
/--
A helper function to specify that two lists are disjoint.
-/
@[grind] def _root_.List.disjoint {α} [DecidableEq α] : List α → List α → Bool
| [], _ => true
| x::xs, ys => x ∉ ys && xs.disjoint ys
/--
An if expression evaluates each variable at most once if for each if-then-else
the variables in the "if" clause are disjoint from the variables in the "then" clause, and
the variables in the "if" clause are disjoint from the variables in the "else" clause.
-/
def disjoint : IfExpr → Bool
| lit _ => true
| var _ => true
| ite i t e =>
i.vars.disjoint t.vars && i.vars.disjoint e.vars && i.disjoint && t.disjoint && e.disjoint
/--
An if expression is "normalized" if it has no nested, constant, or redundant ifs,
and it evaluates each variable at most once.
-/
def normalized (e : IfExpr) : Bool :=
!e.hasNestedIf && !e.hasConstantIf && !e.hasRedundantIf && e.disjoint
/--
The evaluation of an if expression at some assignment of variables.
-/
def eval (f : Nat → Bool) : IfExpr → Bool
| lit b => b
| var i => f i
| ite i t e => bif i.eval f then t.eval f else e.eval f
end IfExpr
/--
This is the statement of the if normalization problem.
We require a function that transforms if expressions to normalized if expressions,
preserving all evaluations.
-/
def IfNormalization : Type := { Z : IfExpr → IfExpr // ∀ e, (Z e).normalized ∧ (Z e).eval = e.eval }
/-!
# A solution to the if normalization challenge in Lean, using `grind`.
-/
-- `grind` is currently experimental, but for now we can suppress the warnings about this.
set_option grind.warning false
-- We first set up some convenient macros for dealing with subtypes using `grind`.
/-- Construct a term of a subtype, using `grind` to discharge the condition. -/
macro "g⟨" a:term "⟩" : term => `(⟨$a, by grind (gen := 8) (splits := 9)⟩)
/--
Replace a term of a subtype with a term of a different subtype, using the same data,
and using `grind` to discharge the new condition (with access to the old condition).
-/
macro "c⟨" a:term "⟩" : term => `(have aux := $a; ⟨aux.1, by grind⟩)
namespace IfExpr
attribute [grind] List.mem_cons List.not_mem_nil List.mem_append
Option.getD_some Option.getD_none
attribute [local grind] normalized hasNestedIf hasConstantIf hasRedundantIf disjoint vars
-- I'd prefer to use `TreeMap` here, but its `getElem?_insert` lemma is not useful.
attribute [grind] Std.HashMap.getElem?_insert
/-!
Lemmas for `eval`.
-/
@[grind] theorem eval_lit : (lit b).eval f = b := rfl
@[grind] theorem eval_var : (var i).eval f = f i := rfl
@[grind] theorem eval_ite_lit :
(ite (.lit b) t e).eval f = bif b then t.eval f else e.eval f := rfl
@[grind] theorem eval_ite_var :
(ite (.var i) t e).eval f = bif f i then t.eval f else e.eval f := rfl
@[grind] theorem eval_ite_ite {a b c d e : IfExpr} :
(ite (ite a b c) d e).eval f = (ite a (ite b d e) (ite c d e)).eval f := by grind [eval]
/--
Custom size function for if-expressions, used for proving termination.
It is designed so that if we decrease the size of the "if" condition by one,
we are allowed to increase the size of the branches by one, and still be smaller.
-/
-- We add the `simp` attribute so the termination checker can unfold the function.
@[simp] def normSize : IfExpr → Nat
| lit _ => 0
| var _ => 1
| .ite i t e => 2 * normSize i + max (normSize t) (normSize e) + 1
def normalize (assign : Std.HashMap Nat Bool) : IfExpr → IfExpr
| lit b => lit b
| var v =>
match h : assign[v]? with -- Note unused `h`: if we remove this things work again.
| none => var v
| some b => lit b
| ite (lit true) t _ => normalize assign t
| ite (lit false) _ e => normalize assign e
| ite (ite a b c) t e => normalize assign (ite a (ite b t e) (ite c t e))
| ite (var v) t e =>
match assign[v]? with
| none =>
have t' := normalize (assign.insert v true) t
have e' := normalize (assign.insert v false) e
if t' = e' then t' else ite (var v) t' e'
| some b => normalize assign (ite (lit b) t e)
termination_by e => e.normSize
theorem normalize_correct (assign : Std.HashMap Nat Bool) (e : IfExpr) :
(normalize assign e).normalized
∧ ∀ f, (normalize assign e).eval f = e.eval fun w => assign[w]?.getD (f w)
∧ ∀ (v : Nat), v ∈ vars (normalize assign e) → assign[v]? = none := by
fun_induction normalize
rotate_left
· unfold normalize
-- Note this error disappears if we remove the unused `h` from the match above.
-- Fails with
-- [issue] type error constructing proof for IfExpr.normalize.match_1.eq_1
-- when assigning metavariable ?h_1 with
-- fun h => var v
-- has type
-- assign[v]? = none → IfExpr : Type
-- but is expected to have type
-- none = none → IfExpr : Type
grind
all_goals sorry