This PR makes cdot function expansion take hygiene information into account, fixing "parenthesis capturing" errors that can make erroneous cdots trigger cdot expansion in conjunction with macros. For example, given ```lean macro "baz% " t:term : term => `(1 + ($t)) ``` it used to be that `baz% ·` would expand to `1 + fun x => x`, but now the parentheses in `($t)` do not capture the cdot. We also fix an oversight where cdot function expansion ignored the fact that type ascriptions and tuples were supposed to delimit expansion, and also now the quotation prechecker ignores the identifier in `hygieneInfo`. (#9491 added the hygiene information to the parenthesis and cdot syntaxes.) This fixes a bug discovered by [Google DeepMind](https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/DeepMind.com/Blog/imo-2024-solutions/P1/index.html), which made use of `useλy . x=>y.rec λS p=>?_`. The `use` tactic from Mathlib wrapped the provided term in a type ascription, and so this was equivalent to `use fun x => λy x x=>y.rec λS p=>?_`. (Note that cdot function expansion is not able to take into account *where* the cdots are located, and it is syntactically valid to insert an identifier into the binder list like this. If we ever want to address this in the future, we could have cdots expand into a special term that wraps an identifier that evaluates to a local, but which would cause errors in other contexts.) Design note: we put the `hygieneInfo` on the open parenthesis rather than at the end, since that way the hygiene information is available even when there are parsing errors. This is important since we rely on being able to elaborate partial syntax to get elab info (e.g. in `(a.` to get completion info). Note that syntax matchers check that the `hygieneInfo` is actually present, so such partial syntax would not be matched.
199 lines
7.5 KiB
Text
199 lines
7.5 KiB
Text
/-
|
||
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
|
||
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
|
||
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
|
||
-/
|
||
module
|
||
|
||
prelude
|
||
public import Init.Data.List.Lemmas
|
||
public import Init.Data.List.Pairwise
|
||
|
||
public section
|
||
|
||
/-!
|
||
# Lemmas about `List.min?` and `List.max?.
|
||
-/
|
||
|
||
set_option linter.listVariables true -- Enforce naming conventions for `List`/`Array`/`Vector` variables.
|
||
set_option linter.indexVariables true -- Enforce naming conventions for index variables.
|
||
|
||
namespace List
|
||
|
||
open Nat
|
||
|
||
/-! ## Minima and maxima -/
|
||
|
||
/-! ### min? -/
|
||
|
||
@[simp] theorem min?_nil [Min α] : ([] : List α).min? = none := rfl
|
||
|
||
-- We don't put `@[simp]` on `min?_cons'`,
|
||
-- because the definition in terms of `foldl` is not useful for proofs.
|
||
theorem min?_cons' [Min α] {xs : List α} : (x :: xs).min? = some (foldl min x xs) := rfl
|
||
|
||
@[simp] theorem min?_cons [Min α] [Std.Associative (min : α → α → α)] {xs : List α} :
|
||
(x :: xs).min? = some (xs.min?.elim x (min x)) := by
|
||
cases xs <;> simp [min?_cons', foldl_assoc]
|
||
|
||
@[simp] theorem min?_eq_none_iff {xs : List α} [Min α] : xs.min? = none ↔ xs = [] := by
|
||
cases xs <;> simp [min?]
|
||
|
||
theorem isSome_min?_of_mem {l : List α} [Min α] {a : α} (h : a ∈ l) :
|
||
l.min?.isSome := by
|
||
cases l <;> simp_all [min?_cons']
|
||
|
||
theorem min?_eq_head? {α : Type u} [Min α] {l : List α}
|
||
(h : l.Pairwise (fun a b => min a b = a)) : l.min? = l.head? := by
|
||
cases l with
|
||
| nil => rfl
|
||
| cons x l =>
|
||
rw [head?_cons, min?_cons', Option.some.injEq]
|
||
induction l generalizing x with
|
||
| nil => simp
|
||
| cons y l ih =>
|
||
have hx : min x y = x := rel_of_pairwise_cons h mem_cons_self
|
||
rw [foldl_cons, ih _ (hx.symm ▸ h.sublist (by simp)), hx]
|
||
|
||
theorem min?_mem [Min α] (min_eq_or : ∀ a b : α, min a b = a ∨ min a b = b) :
|
||
{xs : List α} → xs.min? = some a → a ∈ xs := by
|
||
intro xs
|
||
match xs with
|
||
| nil => simp
|
||
| x :: xs =>
|
||
simp only [min?_cons', Option.some.injEq, mem_cons]
|
||
intro eq
|
||
induction xs generalizing x with
|
||
| nil =>
|
||
simp at eq
|
||
simp [eq]
|
||
| cons y xs ind =>
|
||
simp at eq
|
||
have p := ind _ eq
|
||
cases p with
|
||
| inl p =>
|
||
cases min_eq_or x y with | _ q => simp [p, q]
|
||
| inr p => simp [p, mem_cons]
|
||
|
||
-- See also `Init.Data.List.Nat.Basic` for specialisations of the next two results to `Nat`.
|
||
|
||
theorem le_min?_iff [Min α] [LE α]
|
||
(le_min_iff : ∀ a b c : α, a ≤ min b c ↔ a ≤ b ∧ a ≤ c) :
|
||
{xs : List α} → xs.min? = some a → ∀ {x}, x ≤ a ↔ ∀ b, b ∈ xs → x ≤ b
|
||
| nil => by simp
|
||
| cons x xs => by
|
||
rw [min?]
|
||
intro eq y
|
||
simp only [Option.some.injEq] at eq
|
||
induction xs generalizing x with
|
||
| nil =>
|
||
simp at eq
|
||
simp [eq]
|
||
| cons z xs ih =>
|
||
simp at eq
|
||
simp [ih _ eq, le_min_iff, and_assoc]
|
||
|
||
-- This could be refactored by designing appropriate typeclasses to replace `le_refl`, `min_eq_or`,
|
||
-- and `le_min_iff`.
|
||
theorem min?_eq_some_iff [Min α] [LE α]
|
||
(le_refl : ∀ a : α, a ≤ a)
|
||
(min_eq_or : ∀ a b : α, min a b = a ∨ min a b = b)
|
||
(le_min_iff : ∀ a b c : α, a ≤ min b c ↔ a ≤ b ∧ a ≤ c) {xs : List α}
|
||
(anti : ∀ a b, a ∈ xs → b ∈ xs → a ≤ b → b ≤ a → a = b := by
|
||
exact fun a b _ _ => Std.Antisymm.antisymm a b) :
|
||
xs.min? = some a ↔ a ∈ xs ∧ ∀ b, b ∈ xs → a ≤ b := by
|
||
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨min?_mem min_eq_or h, (le_min?_iff le_min_iff h).1 (le_refl _)⟩, ?_⟩
|
||
intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
|
||
cases xs with
|
||
| nil => simp at h₁
|
||
| cons x xs =>
|
||
exact congrArg some <| anti _ _ (min?_mem min_eq_or rfl) h₁
|
||
((le_min?_iff le_min_iff (xs := x::xs) rfl).1 (le_refl _) _ h₁)
|
||
(h₂ _ (min?_mem min_eq_or (xs := x::xs) rfl))
|
||
|
||
theorem min?_replicate [Min α] {n : Nat} {a : α} (w : min a a = a) :
|
||
(replicate n a).min? = if n = 0 then none else some a := by
|
||
induction n with
|
||
| zero => rfl
|
||
| succ n ih => cases n <;> simp_all [replicate_succ, min?_cons']
|
||
|
||
@[simp] theorem min?_replicate_of_pos [Min α] {n : Nat} {a : α} (w : min a a = a) (h : 0 < n) :
|
||
(replicate n a).min? = some a := by
|
||
simp [min?_replicate, Nat.ne_of_gt h, w]
|
||
|
||
theorem foldl_min [Min α] [Std.IdempotentOp (min : α → α → α)] [Std.Associative (min : α → α → α)]
|
||
{l : List α} {a : α} : l.foldl (init := a) min = min a (l.min?.getD a) := by
|
||
cases l <;> simp [min?, foldl_assoc, Std.IdempotentOp.idempotent]
|
||
|
||
/-! ### max? -/
|
||
|
||
@[simp] theorem max?_nil [Max α] : ([] : List α).max? = none := rfl
|
||
|
||
-- We don't put `@[simp]` on `max?_cons'`,
|
||
-- because the definition in terms of `foldl` is not useful for proofs.
|
||
theorem max?_cons' [Max α] {xs : List α} : (x :: xs).max? = some (foldl max x xs) := rfl
|
||
|
||
@[simp] theorem max?_cons [Max α] [Std.Associative (max : α → α → α)] {xs : List α} :
|
||
(x :: xs).max? = some (xs.max?.elim x (max x)) := by
|
||
cases xs <;> simp [max?_cons', foldl_assoc]
|
||
|
||
@[simp] theorem max?_eq_none_iff {xs : List α} [Max α] : xs.max? = none ↔ xs = [] := by
|
||
cases xs <;> simp [max?]
|
||
|
||
theorem isSome_max?_of_mem {l : List α} [Max α] {a : α} (h : a ∈ l) :
|
||
l.max?.isSome := by
|
||
cases l <;> simp_all [max?_cons']
|
||
|
||
theorem max?_mem [Max α] (min_eq_or : ∀ a b : α, max a b = a ∨ max a b = b) :
|
||
{xs : List α} → xs.max? = some a → a ∈ xs
|
||
| nil => by simp
|
||
| cons x xs => by
|
||
rw [max?]; rintro ⟨⟩
|
||
induction xs generalizing x with simp at *
|
||
| cons y xs ih =>
|
||
rcases ih (max x y) with h | h <;> simp [h]
|
||
simp [← or_assoc, min_eq_or x y]
|
||
|
||
-- See also `Init.Data.List.Nat.Basic` for specialisations of the next two results to `Nat`.
|
||
|
||
theorem max?_le_iff [Max α] [LE α]
|
||
(max_le_iff : ∀ a b c : α, max b c ≤ a ↔ b ≤ a ∧ c ≤ a) :
|
||
{xs : List α} → xs.max? = some a → ∀ {x}, a ≤ x ↔ ∀ b ∈ xs, b ≤ x
|
||
| nil => by simp
|
||
| cons x xs => by
|
||
rw [max?]; rintro ⟨⟩ y
|
||
induction xs generalizing x with
|
||
| nil => simp
|
||
| cons y xs ih => simp [ih, max_le_iff, and_assoc]
|
||
|
||
-- This could be refactored by designing appropriate typeclasses to replace `le_refl`, `max_eq_or`,
|
||
-- and `le_min_iff`.
|
||
theorem max?_eq_some_iff [Max α] [LE α] [anti : Std.Antisymm (· ≤ · : α → α → Prop)]
|
||
(le_refl : ∀ a : α, a ≤ a)
|
||
(max_eq_or : ∀ a b : α, max a b = a ∨ max a b = b)
|
||
(max_le_iff : ∀ a b c : α, max b c ≤ a ↔ b ≤ a ∧ c ≤ a) {xs : List α} :
|
||
xs.max? = some a ↔ a ∈ xs ∧ ∀ b ∈ xs, b ≤ a := by
|
||
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨max?_mem max_eq_or h, (max?_le_iff max_le_iff h).1 (le_refl _)⟩, ?_⟩
|
||
intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
|
||
cases xs with
|
||
| nil => simp at h₁
|
||
| cons x xs =>
|
||
exact congrArg some <| anti.1 _ _
|
||
(h₂ _ (max?_mem max_eq_or (xs := x::xs) rfl))
|
||
((max?_le_iff max_le_iff (xs := x::xs) rfl).1 (le_refl _) _ h₁)
|
||
|
||
theorem max?_replicate [Max α] {n : Nat} {a : α} (w : max a a = a) :
|
||
(replicate n a).max? = if n = 0 then none else some a := by
|
||
induction n with
|
||
| zero => rfl
|
||
| succ n ih => cases n <;> simp_all [replicate_succ, max?_cons']
|
||
|
||
@[simp] theorem max?_replicate_of_pos [Max α] {n : Nat} {a : α} (w : max a a = a) (h : 0 < n) :
|
||
(replicate n a).max? = some a := by
|
||
simp [max?_replicate, Nat.ne_of_gt h, w]
|
||
|
||
theorem foldl_max [Max α] [Std.IdempotentOp (max : α → α → α)] [Std.Associative (max : α → α → α)]
|
||
{l : List α} {a : α} : l.foldl (init := a) max = max a (l.max?.getD a) := by
|
||
cases l <;> simp [max?, foldl_assoc, Std.IdempotentOp.idempotent]
|
||
|
||
end List
|