On
[Zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/270676-lean4/topic/Notation.20in.20namespace.20not.20showing.20in.20pp/near/437016468),
Peter Nelson reported that notations that could be pretty printed with
generalized field notation did not pretty print using the intended
notation.
This PR makes it so that app unexpanders are considered before
generalized field notation. The complexity before was that we wanted to
do parent projection collapse, and since we did the collapse before
pretty printing that argument, it meant it wasn't possible to do app
unexpanders when there was a field notation candidate. The new solution
is to collapse parent projections only when actually considering field
notation, which can be done because we can safely strip off projection
syntax in an expression-directed way.
3bd2a7419d