lean4-htt/tests/lean/run/funind_proof.lean
Kyle Miller 7fa1a8b114
chore: eliminate uses of intros x y z (#9983)
This PR eliminates uses of `intros x y z` (with arguments) and updates
the `intros` docstring to suggest that `intro x y z` should be used
instead. The `intros` tactic is historical, and can be traced all the
way back to Lean 2, when `intro` could only introduce a single
hypothesis. Since 2020, the `intro` tactic has superceded it. The
`intros` tactic (without arguments) is currently still useful.
2025-08-19 06:09:13 +00:00

71 lines
3 KiB
Text

inductive Term where
| const : String → Term
| app : String → List Term → Term
namespace Term
mutual
def numConsts : Term → Nat
| const _ => 1
| app _ cs => numConstsLst cs
def numConstsLst : List Term → Nat
| [] => 0
| c :: cs => numConsts c + numConstsLst cs
end
mutual
-- Since #4733 this function can be compiled using structural recursion,
-- but then the construction of the functional induction principle falls over
-- TODO: Fix funind, and then omit the `termination_by` here (or test both variants)
def replaceConst (a b : String) : Term → Term
| const c => if a == c then const b else const c
| app f cs => app f (replaceConstLst a b cs)
termination_by t => sizeOf t
def replaceConstLst (a b : String) : List Term → List Term
| [] => []
| c :: cs => replaceConst a b c :: replaceConstLst a b cs
termination_by ts => sizeOf ts
end
/--
info: Term.replaceConst.induct (a : String) (motive1 : Term → Prop) (motive2 : List Term → Prop)
(case1 : ∀ (a_1 : String), (a == a_1) = true → motive1 (const a_1))
(case2 : ∀ (a_1 : String), ¬(a == a_1) = true → motive1 (const a_1))
(case3 : ∀ (a : String) (cs : List Term), motive2 cs → motive1 (app a cs)) (case4 : motive2 [])
(case5 : ∀ (c : Term) (cs : List Term), motive1 c → motive2 cs → motive2 (c :: cs)) (a✝ : Term) : motive1 a✝
-/
#guard_msgs in
#check replaceConst.induct
theorem numConsts_replaceConst (a b : String) (e : Term) : numConsts (replaceConst a b e) = numConsts e := by
apply replaceConst.induct
(motive1 := fun e => numConsts (replaceConst a b e) = numConsts e)
(motive2 := fun es => numConstsLst (replaceConstLst a b es) = numConstsLst es)
case case1 => intro c h; guard_hyp h :ₛ (a == c) = true; simp [replaceConst, numConsts, *]
case case2 => intro c h; guard_hyp h :ₛ ¬(a == c) = true; simp [replaceConst, numConsts, *]
case case3 =>
intro f cs ih
guard_hyp ih :ₛnumConstsLst (replaceConstLst a b cs) = numConstsLst cs
simp [replaceConst, numConsts, *]
case case4 => simp [replaceConstLst, numConstsLst, *]
case case5 =>
intro c cs ih₁ ih₂
guard_hyp ih₁ :ₛ numConsts (replaceConst a b c) = numConsts c
guard_hyp ih₂ :ₛ numConstsLst (replaceConstLst a b cs) = numConstsLst cs
simp [replaceConstLst, numConstsLst, *]
theorem numConsts_replaceConst' (a b : String) (e : Term) : numConsts (replaceConst a b e) = numConsts e := by
apply replaceConst.induct
(motive1 := fun e => numConsts (replaceConst a b e) = numConsts e)
(motive2 := fun es => numConstsLst (replaceConstLst a b es) = numConstsLst es)
<;> intros <;> simp [replaceConst, numConsts, replaceConstLst, numConstsLst, *]
theorem numConsts_replaceConst'' (a b : String) (e : Term) : numConsts (replaceConst a b e) = numConsts e := by
induction e using replaceConst.induct (a := a)
(motive2 := fun es => numConstsLst (replaceConstLst a b es) = numConstsLst es) <;>
simp [replaceConst, numConsts, replaceConstLst, numConstsLst, *]
end Term