lean4-htt/tests/lean/run/dunfold3.lean
Leonardo de Moura 5cef84709f refactor(library): avoid auxiliary definitions such as add/mul/le/etc
See Section "Other goodies" at
https://github.com/leanprover/lean/wiki/Refactoring-structures

This commit also improves the support for projections in the
unifier/matcher.

Now, we consider the extra case-split for projections.
Given a projection `proj`, and the constraint `proj s =?= proj t`, we need to try first `s =?= t` and if it fails, then try to reduce.
This is needed in the standard library because we now have constraints such as:
```
@has_le.le ?A ?s ?a ?b  =?=  @has_le.le nat nat.has_add x y
```
If we reduce the right hand side, we get the unsolvable constraint
```
@has_le.le ?A ?s ?a ?b  =?=  nat.le x y
```
Before this change, the constraint was `@le ?A ?s ?a ?b  =?=  @le nat nat.has_add x y`, and we already perform a case-split in this case.
Moreover, projections were eagerly reduced whenever possible.
The extra case-split generates a performance problem in several tests. For example `fib 8 = 34` was timing out.
I worked around this issue by performing the case-split only when the constraint contains meta-variables.
There are also minor issues. Example. `<` is notation for `has_lt.lt`, but `>` is for `gt`.
2017-05-01 08:52:19 -07:00

30 lines
887 B
Text

open tactic
def g : nat → nat := λ x, x + 5
example (a b : nat) (p : nat → Prop) (h : p (g (nat.succ (nat.succ a)))) : p (g (a + 2)) :=
begin
unfold g at h,
do { h ← get_local `h >>= infer_type, t ← to_expr `(p (nat.succ (nat.succ a) + 5)), guard (h = t) },
unfold has_add.add bit0 has_one.one nat.add,
unfold g,
do { t ← target, h ← get_local `h >>= infer_type, guard (t = h) },
assumption
end
meta def check_expected (p : pexpr) : tactic unit :=
do t ← target, ex ← to_expr p, guard (t = ex)
example (a b c : nat) (f : nat → nat → nat) (h : false) : f (g a) (g b) = (g c) :=
begin
unfold_occs g [2],
check_expected `(f (g a) (b + 5) = g c),
contradiction
end
example (a b c : nat) (f : nat → nat → nat) (h : false) : f (g a) (g b) = (g c) :=
begin
unfold_occs g [1, 3],
check_expected `(f (a + 5) (g b) = c + 5),
contradiction
end