b8f2f28e0d
I did not introduce `inductTheoremSuffix` etc, it seems more direct to just spell out the suffix here. If we ever change it there are many occurrences where they need to be changed anyways, so the definition doesn't seem to save much work or add that much robustness.
6 lines
757 B
Text
6 lines
757 B
Text
funind_reserved.lean:18:4-18:7: error: failed to declare `Structural.foo` because `Structural.foo.induct` has already been declared
|
|
funind_reserved.lean:28:4-28:7: error: failed to declare `WF.foo` because `WF.foo.induct` has already been declared
|
|
funind_reserved.lean:40:4-40:7: error: failed to declare `Mutual1.foo` because `Mutual1.foo.induct` has already been declared
|
|
funind_reserved.lean:63:4-63:7: error: failed to declare `Mutual2.bar` because `Mutual2.bar.induct` has already been declared
|
|
funind_reserved.lean:76:4-76:7: error: failed to declare `Mutual3.foo` because `Mutual3.foo.mutual_induct` has already been declared
|
|
funind_reserved.lean:91:4-91:7: error: failed to declare `Nested.foo` because `Nested.foo.induct` has already been declared
|