building upon #3714, this (almost) implements the second half of #3302. The main effect is that we now get a better error message when `rfl` fails. For ```lean example : n+1+m = n + (1+m) := by rfl ``` instead of the wall of text ``` The rfl tactic failed. Possible reasons: - The goal is not a reflexive relation (neither `=` nor a relation with a @[refl] lemma). - The arguments of the relation are not equal. Try using the reflexivity lemma for your relation explicitly, e.g. `exact Eq.refl _` or `exact HEq.rfl` etc. n m : Nat ⊢ n + 1 + m = n + (1 + m) ``` we now get ``` error: tactic 'rfl' failed, the left-hand side n + 1 + m is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side n + (1 + m) n m : Nat ⊢ n + 1 + m = n + (1 + m) ``` Unfortunately, because of very subtle differences in semantics (which transparency setting is used when reducing the goal and whether the “implicit lambda” feature applies) I could not make this simply the only `rfl` implementation. So `rfl` remains a macro and is still expanded to `eq_refl` (difference transparency setting) and `exact Iff.rfl` and `exact HEq.rfl` (implicit lambda) to not break existing code. This can be revised later, so this still closes: #3302. A user might still be puzzled *why* to terms are not defeq. Explaining that better (“reduced to… and reduces to… etc.”) would also be great, but that’s not specific to `rfl`, so better left for some other time.
454 lines
10 KiB
Text
454 lines
10 KiB
Text
|
||
/-!
|
||
This file tests the `rfl` tactic:
|
||
* Extensibility
|
||
* Error messages
|
||
* Effect of `with_reducible`
|
||
-/
|
||
|
||
-- First, let's see what `rfl` does:
|
||
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, the left-hand side
|
||
false
|
||
is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side
|
||
true
|
||
⊢ false = true
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : false = true := by rfl
|
||
|
||
-- Now to `apply_rfl`.
|
||
|
||
-- A plain reflexive predicate
|
||
inductive P : α → α → Prop where | refl : P a a
|
||
attribute [refl] P.refl
|
||
|
||
-- Plain error
|
||
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, the left-hand side
|
||
42
|
||
is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side
|
||
23
|
||
⊢ P 42 23
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : P 42 23 := by apply_rfl
|
||
|
||
-- Revealing implicit arguments
|
||
|
||
opaque withImplicitNat {n : Nat} : Nat
|
||
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, the left-hand side
|
||
@withImplicitNat 42
|
||
is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side
|
||
@withImplicitNat 23
|
||
⊢ P withImplicitNat withImplicitNat
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : P (@withImplicitNat 42) (@withImplicitNat 23) := by apply_rfl
|
||
|
||
|
||
-- Exhaustive testing of various combinations:
|
||
|
||
-- In addition to Eq, HEq and Iff we test four relations:
|
||
|
||
|
||
-- Defeq to relation `P` at reducible transparency
|
||
abbrev Q : α → α → Prop := P
|
||
|
||
-- Defeq to relation `P` at default transparency
|
||
def Q' : α → α → Prop := P
|
||
|
||
-- No refl attribute
|
||
inductive R : α → α → Prop where | refl : R a a
|
||
|
||
|
||
/-
|
||
Now we systematically test all relations with
|
||
* syntactic equal arguments
|
||
* reducibly equal arguments
|
||
* semireducibly equal arguments
|
||
* nonequal arguments
|
||
|
||
and all using `apply_rfl` and `with_reducible apply_rfl`
|
||
-/
|
||
|
||
|
||
-- Syntactic equal
|
||
|
||
example : true = true := by apply_rfl
|
||
example : HEq true true := by apply_rfl
|
||
example : True ↔ True := by apply_rfl
|
||
example : P true true := by apply_rfl
|
||
example : Q true true := by apply_rfl
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, no @[refl] lemma registered for relation
|
||
Q'
|
||
⊢ Q' true true
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in example : Q' true true := by apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, no @[refl] lemma registered for relation
|
||
R
|
||
⊢ R true true
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in example : R true true := by apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
|
||
example : true = true := by with_reducible apply_rfl
|
||
example : HEq true true := by with_reducible apply_rfl
|
||
example : True ↔ True := by with_reducible apply_rfl
|
||
example : P true true := by with_reducible apply_rfl
|
||
example : Q true true := by with_reducible apply_rfl
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, no @[refl] lemma registered for relation
|
||
Q'
|
||
⊢ Q' true true
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : Q' true true := by with_reducible apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, no @[refl] lemma registered for relation
|
||
R
|
||
⊢ R true true
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : R true true := by with_reducible apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
|
||
-- Reducibly equal
|
||
|
||
abbrev true' := true
|
||
abbrev True' := True
|
||
|
||
example : true' = true := by apply_rfl
|
||
example : HEq true' true := by apply_rfl
|
||
example : True' ↔ True := by apply_rfl
|
||
example : P true' true := by apply_rfl
|
||
example : Q true' true := by apply_rfl
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, no @[refl] lemma registered for relation
|
||
Q'
|
||
⊢ Q' true' true'
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : Q' true' true := by apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, no @[refl] lemma registered for relation
|
||
R
|
||
⊢ R true' true'
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : R true' true := by apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
|
||
example : true' = true := by with_reducible apply_rfl
|
||
example : HEq true' true := by with_reducible apply_rfl
|
||
example : True' ↔ True := by with_reducible apply_rfl
|
||
example : P true' true := by with_reducible apply_rfl
|
||
example : Q true' true := by with_reducible apply_rfl -- NB: No error, Q and true' reducible
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, no @[refl] lemma registered for relation
|
||
Q'
|
||
⊢ Q' true' true'
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : Q' true' true := by with_reducible apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, no @[refl] lemma registered for relation
|
||
R
|
||
⊢ R true' true'
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : R true' true := by with_reducible apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
|
||
-- Equal at default transparency only
|
||
|
||
def true'' := true
|
||
def True'' := True
|
||
|
||
example : true'' = true := by apply_rfl
|
||
example : HEq true'' true := by apply_rfl
|
||
example : True'' ↔ True := by apply_rfl
|
||
example : P true'' true := by apply_rfl
|
||
example : Q true'' true := by apply_rfl
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, no @[refl] lemma registered for relation
|
||
Q'
|
||
⊢ Q' true'' true''
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : Q' true'' true := by apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, no @[refl] lemma registered for relation
|
||
R
|
||
⊢ R true'' true''
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : R true'' true := by apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, the left-hand side
|
||
true''
|
||
is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side
|
||
true
|
||
⊢ true'' = true
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : true'' = true := by with_reducible apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'apply' failed, failed to unify
|
||
@HEq ?α ?a ?α ?a
|
||
with
|
||
@HEq Bool true'' Bool true
|
||
⊢ HEq true'' true
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : HEq true'' true := by with_reducible apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, the left-hand side
|
||
True''
|
||
is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side
|
||
True
|
||
⊢ True'' ↔ True
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : True'' ↔ True := by with_reducible apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, the left-hand side
|
||
true''
|
||
is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side
|
||
true
|
||
⊢ P true'' true
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : P true'' true := by with_reducible apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, the left-hand side
|
||
true''
|
||
is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side
|
||
true
|
||
⊢ Q true'' true
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : Q true'' true := by with_reducible apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, the left-hand side
|
||
true''
|
||
is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side
|
||
true
|
||
⊢ Q' true'' true
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : Q' true'' true := by with_reducible apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, the left-hand side
|
||
true''
|
||
is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side
|
||
true
|
||
⊢ R true'' true
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : R true'' true := by with_reducible apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
|
||
-- Unequal
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, the left-hand side
|
||
false
|
||
is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side
|
||
true
|
||
⊢ false = true
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : false = true := by apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'apply' failed, failed to unify
|
||
HEq ?a ?a
|
||
with
|
||
HEq false true
|
||
⊢ HEq false true
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : HEq false true := by apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, the left-hand side
|
||
False
|
||
is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side
|
||
True
|
||
⊢ False ↔ True
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : False ↔ True := by apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, the left-hand side
|
||
false
|
||
is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side
|
||
true
|
||
⊢ P false true
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : P false true := by apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, the left-hand side
|
||
false
|
||
is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side
|
||
true
|
||
⊢ Q false true
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : Q false true := by apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, the left-hand side
|
||
false
|
||
is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side
|
||
true
|
||
⊢ Q' false true
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : Q' false true := by apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, the left-hand side
|
||
false
|
||
is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side
|
||
true
|
||
⊢ R false true
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : R false true := by apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, the left-hand side
|
||
false
|
||
is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side
|
||
true
|
||
⊢ false = true
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : false = true := by with_reducible apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'apply' failed, failed to unify
|
||
HEq ?a ?a
|
||
with
|
||
HEq false true
|
||
⊢ HEq false true
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : HEq false true := by with_reducible apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, the left-hand side
|
||
False
|
||
is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side
|
||
True
|
||
⊢ False ↔ True
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : False ↔ True := by with_reducible apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, the left-hand side
|
||
false
|
||
is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side
|
||
true
|
||
⊢ P false true
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : P false true := by with_reducible apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, the left-hand side
|
||
false
|
||
is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side
|
||
true
|
||
⊢ Q false true
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : Q false true := by with_reducible apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, the left-hand side
|
||
false
|
||
is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side
|
||
true
|
||
⊢ Q' false true
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : Q' false true := by with_reducible apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, the left-hand side
|
||
false
|
||
is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side
|
||
true
|
||
⊢ R false true
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : R false true := by with_reducible apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
|
||
-- Inheterogeneous unequal
|
||
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'apply' failed, failed to unify
|
||
HEq ?a ?a
|
||
with
|
||
HEq true 1
|
||
⊢ HEq true 1
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : HEq true 1 := by apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'apply' failed, failed to unify
|
||
HEq ?a ?a
|
||
with
|
||
HEq true 1
|
||
⊢ HEq true 1
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : HEq true 1 := by with_reducible apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
|
||
-- Rfl lemma with side condition:
|
||
-- Error message should show left-over goal
|
||
|
||
inductive S : Bool → Bool → Prop where | refl : a = true → S a a
|
||
attribute [refl] S.refl
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, the left-hand side
|
||
true
|
||
is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side
|
||
false
|
||
⊢ S true false
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : S true false := by apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
/--
|
||
error: tactic 'rfl' failed, the left-hand side
|
||
true
|
||
is not definitionally equal to the right-hand side
|
||
false
|
||
⊢ S true false
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : S true false := by with_reducible apply_rfl -- Error
|
||
/--
|
||
error: unsolved goals
|
||
case a
|
||
⊢ true = true
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : S true true := by apply_rfl -- Error (left-over goal)
|
||
/--
|
||
error: unsolved goals
|
||
case a
|
||
⊢ true = true
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : S true true := by with_reducible apply_rfl -- Error (left-over goal)
|
||
/--
|
||
error: unsolved goals
|
||
case a
|
||
⊢ false = true
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : S false false := by apply_rfl -- Error (left-over goal)
|
||
/--
|
||
error: unsolved goals
|
||
case a
|
||
⊢ false = true
|
||
-/
|
||
#guard_msgs in
|
||
example : S false false := by with_reducible apply_rfl -- Error (left-over goal)
|