lean4-htt/tests/lean/run/simp_int_arith.lean
Leonardo de Moura dd3652ecdc
feat: cutsat preparations (#7097)
This PR implements several modifications for the cutsat procedure in
`grind`.
- The maximal variable is now at the beginning of linear polynomials. 
- The old `LinearArith.Solver` was deleted, and the normalizer was moved
to `Simp`.
- cutsat first files were created, and basic infrastructure for
representing divisibility constraints was added.
2025-02-16 02:52:14 +00:00

340 lines
10 KiB
Text
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

example (x y : Int) : x + y + 2 + y = y + 1 + 1 + x + y := by
simp +arith only
example (x y : Int) (h : x + y + 2 + y < y + 1 + 1 + x + y) : False := by
simp +arith only at h
example (x y : Int) (h : x + y + 2 + y > y + 1 + 1 + x + y) : False := by
simp +arith only at h
example (x y : Int) (_h : x + y + 3 + y > y + 1 + 1 + x + y) : True := by
simp +arith only at _h
guard_hyp _h : True
constructor
example (x y : Int) (h : x + y + 2 + y > 1 + 1 + x + x + y + 2*x) : 3*x + -1*y+1 ≤ 0 := by
simp +arith only at h
guard_hyp h : 3 * x + -1*y + 1 ≤ 0
assumption
example (x y : Int) (h : 6*x + y + 3 + y + 1 < y + 1 + 1 + x + 5*y) : 5*x + -4*y + 3 ≤ 0 := by
simp +arith only at h
guard_hyp h : 5*x + -4*y + 3 ≤ 0
assumption
example (x y : Int) : x + y + 2 + y ≤ y + 1 + 1 + x + y := by
simp +arith only
example (x y : Int) : x + y + 2 + y ≤ y + 1 + 1 + 5 + x + y := by
simp +arith only
example (x y z : Int) : x + y + 2 + y + z + z ≤ y + 3*z + 1 + 1 + x + y - z := by
simp +arith only
example (x y : Int) (h : False) : x + y + 20 + y ≤ y + 1 + 1 + 5 + x + y := by
simp +arith only
guard_target = False
assumption
example (x y : Int) (h : False) : x = y := by
fail_if_success simp +arith only
guard_target = x = y
contradiction
example (x : Int) (h : False) : x = 3 := by
fail_if_success simp +arith only
guard_target = x = 3
contradiction
example (x : Int) (h : False) : 3 = x := by
fail_if_success simp +arith only
guard_target = 3 = x
contradiction
example (x : Int) (h : False) : 2*x = x + 3 := by
simp +arith only
guard_target = x = 3
contradiction
example (x y : Int) (h : False) : 2*x = x + y := by
simp +arith only
guard_target = x = y
contradiction
example (x : Int) (h : False) : 2*x + 1 = x := by
simp +arith only
guard_target = x = -1
contradiction
example (x : Int) (h : False) (f : Int → Int) : f (0 + x + x) = 3 := by
simp +arith only
guard_target = f (2*x) = 3
contradiction
example (x y : Int) (h : False) (f : Int → Int) : f (x + y - x) = 3 := by
simp +arith only
guard_target = f y = 3
contradiction
example (x y : Int) (h : False) (f : Int → Int) : f (x + y - x + 2 - y + 1) = 3 := by
simp +arith only
guard_target = f 3 = 3
contradiction
example (x y : Int) (h : False) (f : Int → Int) : f (x + y - x + (2 - y)*2 + 1) = 3 := by
simp +arith only
guard_target = f (-1*y + 5) = 3
contradiction
example (x y : Int) (h : False) (f : Int → Int) : f (x + y - x + (2 - y)*(1+1) + 1) = 3 := by
simp +arith only [Int.reduceAdd]
guard_target = f (-1*y + 5) = 3
contradiction
example (x y : Int) (h : False) (f : Int → Int) : f (x + y - x + (1-1+2)*(2 - y) + 1) = 3 := by
simp +arith only [Int.reduceAdd, Int.reduceSub]
guard_target = f (-1*y + 5) = 3
contradiction
example (x y : Int) (h : False) (f : Int → Int) : f (Int.add x y - x + (2 - y)*2 + 1) = 3 := by
simp +arith only
guard_target = f (-1*y + 5) = 3
contradiction
example (x y : Int) (h : False) (f : Int → Int) : f (x + y - x + Int.mul (1-1+2) (2 - y) + 1) = 3 := by
simp +arith only [Int.reduceAdd, Int.reduceSub]
guard_target = f (-1*y + 5) = 3
contradiction
example (x y : Int) (h : False) (f : Int → Int) : f (Int.add x y - x + (2 - y)*(-2) + 1) = 3 := by
simp +arith only
guard_target = f (3*y + -3) = 3
contradiction
example (x : Int) : x > x - 1 := by
simp +arith only
example (x : Int) : x - 1 < x := by
simp +arith only
example (x : Int) : x < x + 1 := by
simp +arith only
example (x : Int) : x ≥ x - 1 := by
simp +arith only
example (x : Int) : x ≤ x := by
simp +arith only
example (x : Int) : x ≤ x + 1 := by
simp +arith only
example (x : Int) (h : False) : x > x := by
simp +arith only
guard_target = False
assumption
theorem ex₁ (x y z : Int) : x + y + 2 + y + z + z ≤ y + 3*z + 1 + 1 + x + y - z := by
simp +arith only
/--
info: theorem ex₁ : ∀ (x y z : Int), x + y + 2 + y + z + z ≤ y + 3 * z + 1 + 1 + x + y - z :=
fun x y z =>
of_eq_true
(id
(Int.Linear.RawRelCnstr.eq_true_of_isValid
(Lean.RArray.branch 1 (Lean.RArray.leaf z) (Lean.RArray.branch 2 (Lean.RArray.leaf y) (Lean.RArray.leaf x)))
(Int.Linear.RawRelCnstr.le
((((((Int.Linear.Expr.var 2).add (Int.Linear.Expr.var 1)).add (Int.Linear.Expr.num 2)).add
(Int.Linear.Expr.var 1)).add
(Int.Linear.Expr.var 0)).add
(Int.Linear.Expr.var 0))
(((((((Int.Linear.Expr.var 1).add (Int.Linear.Expr.mulL 3 (Int.Linear.Expr.var 0))).add
(Int.Linear.Expr.num 1)).add
(Int.Linear.Expr.num 1)).add
(Int.Linear.Expr.var 2)).add
(Int.Linear.Expr.var 1)).sub
(Int.Linear.Expr.var 0)))
(Eq.refl true)))
-/
#guard_msgs (info) in
#print ex₁
theorem ex₂ (x y z : Int) (f : Int → Int) : x + f y + 2 + f y + z + z ≤ f y + 3*z + 1 + 1 + x + f y - z := by
simp +arith only
/--
info: theorem ex₂ : ∀ (x y z : Int) (f : Int → Int), x + f y + 2 + f y + z + z ≤ f y + 3 * z + 1 + 1 + x + f y - z :=
fun x y z f =>
of_eq_true
((fun x_1 =>
id
(Int.Linear.RawRelCnstr.eq_true_of_isValid
(Lean.RArray.branch 1 (Lean.RArray.leaf x_1)
(Lean.RArray.branch 2 (Lean.RArray.leaf z) (Lean.RArray.leaf x)))
(Int.Linear.RawRelCnstr.le
((((((Int.Linear.Expr.var 2).add (Int.Linear.Expr.var 0)).add (Int.Linear.Expr.num 2)).add
(Int.Linear.Expr.var 0)).add
(Int.Linear.Expr.var 1)).add
(Int.Linear.Expr.var 1))
(((((((Int.Linear.Expr.var 0).add (Int.Linear.Expr.mulL 3 (Int.Linear.Expr.var 1))).add
(Int.Linear.Expr.num 1)).add
(Int.Linear.Expr.num 1)).add
(Int.Linear.Expr.var 2)).add
(Int.Linear.Expr.var 0)).sub
(Int.Linear.Expr.var 1)))
(Eq.refl true)))
(f y))
-/
#guard_msgs (info) in
#print ex₂
example (x y : Int) (h : False) : 2*x = x + y := by
simp +arith only
guard_target = x = y
contradiction
example (x y : Int) (h : 2*x + 2*y = 4) : x + y = 2 := by
simp +arith only at h
guard_hyp h : x + y + -2 = 0
simp +arith
assumption
example (x y : Int) (h : 6*x + 3*y = 9) : 2*x + y = 3 := by
simp +arith only at h
guard_hyp h : 2*x + y + -3 = 0
simp +arith
assumption
example (x y : Int) (h : 2*x - 2*y ≤ 4) : x - y ≤ 2 := by
simp +arith only at h
guard_hyp h : x + -1*y + -2 ≤ 0
simp +arith
assumption
example (x y : Int) (h : -6*x + 3*y = -9) : - 2*x = -3 - y := by
simp +arith only at h
guard_hyp h : -2*x + y + 3 = 0
simp +arith
assumption
example (x y : Int) (h : 3*x + 6*y = 2) : False := by
simp +arith only at h
example (x : Int) (h : 3*x = 1) : False := by
simp +arith only at h
example (x : Int) (h : 2*x = 1) : False := by
simp +arith only at h
example (x : Int) (h : x + x = 1) : False := by
simp +arith only at h
example (x y : Int) (h : x + x + x = 1 + 2*y + x) : False := by
simp +arith only at h
example (x : Int) (h : -x - x = 1) : False := by
simp +arith only at h
example (x : Int) (h : 2*x ≤ 1) : x ≤ 0 := by
simp +arith only at h
guard_hyp h : x ≤ 0
assumption
example (x y : Int) (h : 6*x + y + y + y ≤ 7) : 2*x + y + -2 ≤ 0 := by
simp +arith only at h
guard_hyp h : 2*x + y + -2 ≤ 0
assumption
example (x y : Int) (h : 5*x + y + y + y ≤ 7 - x) : 2*x + y + -2 ≤ 0 := by
simp +arith only at h
guard_hyp h : 2*x + y + -2 ≤ 0
assumption
example (x : Int) : (11*x ≤ 10) ↔ (x ≤ 0) := by
simp +arith only
example (x : Int) : (11*x > 10) ↔ (x ≥ 1) := by
simp +arith only
example (x y : Int) : (2*x + y + y = 4) ↔ (y + x = 2) := by
simp +arith
example (x y : Int) : (2*x + y + y ≤ 3) ↔ (y + x ≤ 1) := by
simp +arith
example (f : Int → Int) (x y : Int) : f (2*x + y) = f (y + x + x) := by
simp +arith
example (a b : Int) : ¬ 2 2*a + 4*b + 1 := by
simp +arith
example (a b : Int) : ¬ 2 a + 3*b + 1 + b + a := by
simp +arith
example (a b : Int) : ¬ 2 a + 3*b + 1 + b + 5*a := by
simp +arith
example (a b : Int) : 2 4*a + 6*b + 8 := by
simp +arith
example (a b : Int) : 2 2*(a + a) + (3+3)*(b + b) + 8 := by
simp +arith
example (a : Int) : 16 4*a + 32 ↔ 4 a + 8 := by
simp +arith
example (a : Int) : 3 a + a + 1 + a + 1 + a ↔ 3 4*a + 2 := by
simp +arith
example (a : Int) : 2+1 a + a + 1 - a + 1 + a ↔ 3 2*a + 2 := by
simp +arith
example (a b : Int) : 6 a + 21 - a + 3*a + 6*b + 12 ↔ 2 a + 2*b + 11 := by
simp +arith
theorem ex3 (a b : Int) : 6 a + (21 - a) + 3*(a + 2*b) + 12 ↔ 2 a + 2*b + 11 := by
simp +arith
/--
info: theorem ex3 : ∀ (a b : Int), 6 a + (21 - a) + 3 * (a + 2 * b) + 12 ↔ 2 a + 2 * b + 11 :=
fun a b =>
of_eq_true
(Eq.trans
(congrArg (fun x => x ↔ 2 a + 2 * b + 11)
(id
(RawDvdCnstr.eq_of_isEqv (RArray.branch 1 (RArray.leaf b) (RArray.leaf a))
{ k := 6,
e :=
(((Expr.var 1).add ((Expr.num 21).sub (Expr.var 1))).add
(Expr.mulL 3 ((Expr.var 1).add (Expr.mulL 2 (Expr.var 0))))).add
(Expr.num 12) }
{ k := 2, p := Poly.add 1 1 (Poly.add 2 0 (Poly.num 11)) } 3 (Eq.refl true))))
(iff_self (2 a + 2 * b + 11)))
-/
#guard_msgs (info) in
open Lean in open Int.Linear in
#print ex3
theorem ex4 (a b : Int) : 6 a + (11 - a) + 3*(a + 2*b) - 11 ↔ 2 a + 2*b := by
simp +arith
/--
info: theorem ex4 : ∀ (a b : Int), 6 a + (11 - a) + 3 * (a + 2 * b) - 11 ↔ 2 a + 2 * b :=
fun a b =>
of_eq_true
(Eq.trans
(congrArg (fun x => x ↔ 2 a + 2 * b)
(id
(RawDvdCnstr.eq_of_isEqv (RArray.branch 1 (RArray.leaf b) (RArray.leaf a))
{ k := 6,
e :=
(((Expr.var 1).add ((Expr.num 11).sub (Expr.var 1))).add
(Expr.mulL 3 ((Expr.var 1).add (Expr.mulL 2 (Expr.var 0))))).sub
(Expr.num 11) }
{ k := 2, p := Poly.add 1 1 (Poly.add 2 0 (Poly.num 0)) } 3 (Eq.refl true))))
(iff_self (2 a + 2 * b)))
-/
#guard_msgs (info) in
open Lean in open Int.Linear in
#print ex4