714 lines
25 KiB
Text
714 lines
25 KiB
Text
/-
|
||
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
|
||
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
|
||
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad
|
||
-/
|
||
prelude
|
||
import init.data.nat.basic init.meta init.algebra
|
||
|
||
namespace nat
|
||
attribute [pre_smt] nat_zero_eq_zero
|
||
|
||
protected lemma zero_add : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 + n = n
|
||
| 0 := rfl
|
||
| (n+1) := congr_arg succ (zero_add n)
|
||
|
||
lemma succ_add : ∀ n m : ℕ, (succ n) + m = succ (n + m)
|
||
| n 0 := rfl
|
||
| n (m+1) := congr_arg succ (succ_add n m)
|
||
|
||
lemma add_succ : ∀ n m : ℕ, n + succ m = succ (n + m) :=
|
||
λ n m, rfl
|
||
|
||
lemma add_zero : ∀ n : ℕ, n + 0 = n :=
|
||
λ n, rfl
|
||
|
||
lemma add_one_eq_succ : ∀ n : ℕ, n + 1 = succ n :=
|
||
λ n, rfl
|
||
|
||
protected lemma add_comm : ∀ n m : ℕ, n + m = m + n
|
||
| n 0 := eq.symm (nat.zero_add n)
|
||
| n (m+1) :=
|
||
suffices succ (n + m) = succ (m + n), from
|
||
eq.symm (succ_add m n) ▸ this,
|
||
congr_arg succ (add_comm n m)
|
||
|
||
protected lemma add_assoc : ∀ n m k : ℕ, (n + m) + k = n + (m + k)
|
||
| n m 0 := rfl
|
||
| n m (succ k) := by simp [add_succ, add_assoc n m k]
|
||
|
||
protected lemma add_left_comm : ∀ (n m k : ℕ), n + (m + k) = m + (n + k) :=
|
||
left_comm nat.add nat.add_comm nat.add_assoc
|
||
|
||
protected lemma add_left_cancel : ∀ {n m k : ℕ}, n + m = n + k → m = k
|
||
| 0 m k := by ctx_simp [nat.zero_add]
|
||
| (succ n) m k := λ h,
|
||
have n+m = n+k, begin simp [succ_add] at h, injection h, assumption end,
|
||
add_left_cancel this
|
||
|
||
protected lemma add_right_cancel {n m k : ℕ} (h : n + m = k + m) : n = k :=
|
||
have m + n = m + k, begin rw [nat.add_comm n m, nat.add_comm k m] at h, assumption end,
|
||
nat.add_left_cancel this
|
||
|
||
lemma succ_ne_zero (n : ℕ) : succ n ≠ 0 :=
|
||
assume h, nat.no_confusion h
|
||
|
||
lemma succ_ne_self : ∀ n : ℕ, succ n ≠ n
|
||
| 0 h := absurd h (nat.succ_ne_zero 0)
|
||
| (n+1) h := succ_ne_self n (nat.no_confusion h (λ h, h))
|
||
|
||
protected lemma one_ne_zero : 1 ≠ (0 : ℕ) :=
|
||
assume h, nat.no_confusion h
|
||
|
||
protected lemma zero_ne_one : 0 ≠ (1 : ℕ) :=
|
||
assume h, nat.no_confusion h
|
||
|
||
lemma eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_right : ∀ {n m : ℕ}, n + m = 0 → n = 0
|
||
| 0 m := by ctx_simp [nat.zero_add]
|
||
| (n+1) m := λ h,
|
||
begin
|
||
exfalso,
|
||
rw [add_one_eq_succ, succ_add] at h,
|
||
apply succ_ne_zero _ h
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
lemma eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_left {n m : ℕ} (h : n + m = 0) : m = 0 :=
|
||
@eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_right m n (nat.add_comm n m ▸ h)
|
||
|
||
lemma pred_zero : pred 0 = 0 :=
|
||
rfl
|
||
|
||
lemma pred_succ (n : ℕ) : pred (succ n) = n :=
|
||
rfl
|
||
|
||
protected lemma mul_zero (n : ℕ) : n * 0 = 0 :=
|
||
rfl
|
||
|
||
lemma mul_succ (n m : ℕ) : n * succ m = n * m + n :=
|
||
rfl
|
||
|
||
protected theorem zero_mul : ∀ (n : ℕ), 0 * n = 0
|
||
| 0 := rfl
|
||
| (succ n) := by rw [mul_succ, zero_mul]
|
||
|
||
private meta def sort_add :=
|
||
`[simp [nat.add_assoc, nat.add_comm, nat.add_left_comm]]
|
||
|
||
lemma succ_mul : ∀ (n m : ℕ), (succ n) * m = (n * m) + m
|
||
| n 0 := rfl
|
||
| n (succ m) :=
|
||
begin
|
||
simp [mul_succ, add_succ, succ_mul n m],
|
||
sort_add
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
protected lemma right_distrib : ∀ (n m k : ℕ), (n + m) * k = n * k + m * k
|
||
| n m 0 := rfl
|
||
| n m (succ k) :=
|
||
begin simp [mul_succ, right_distrib n m k], sort_add end
|
||
|
||
protected lemma left_distrib : ∀ (n m k : ℕ), n * (m + k) = n * m + n * k
|
||
| 0 m k := by simp [nat.zero_mul]
|
||
| (succ n) m k :=
|
||
begin simp [succ_mul, left_distrib n m k], sort_add end
|
||
|
||
protected lemma mul_comm : ∀ (n m : ℕ), n * m = m * n
|
||
| n 0 := by rw [nat.zero_mul, nat.mul_zero]
|
||
| n (succ m) := by simp [mul_succ, succ_mul, mul_comm n m]
|
||
|
||
protected lemma mul_assoc : ∀ (n m k : ℕ), (n * m) * k = n * (m * k)
|
||
| n m 0 := rfl
|
||
| n m (succ k) := by simp [mul_succ, nat.left_distrib, mul_assoc n m k]
|
||
|
||
protected lemma mul_one : ∀ (n : ℕ), n * 1 = n
|
||
| 0 := rfl
|
||
| (succ n) := by simp [succ_mul, mul_one n, add_one_eq_succ]
|
||
|
||
protected lemma one_mul (n : ℕ) : 1 * n = n :=
|
||
by rw [nat.mul_comm, nat.mul_one]
|
||
|
||
lemma eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero : ∀ {n m : ℕ}, n * m = 0 → n = 0 ∨ m = 0
|
||
| 0 m := λ h, or.inl rfl
|
||
| (succ n) m :=
|
||
begin
|
||
rw succ_mul, intro h,
|
||
exact or.inr (eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_left h)
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
instance : comm_semiring nat :=
|
||
{add := nat.add,
|
||
add_assoc := nat.add_assoc,
|
||
zero := nat.zero,
|
||
zero_add := nat.zero_add,
|
||
add_zero := nat.add_zero,
|
||
add_comm := nat.add_comm,
|
||
mul := nat.mul,
|
||
mul_assoc := nat.mul_assoc,
|
||
one := nat.succ nat.zero,
|
||
one_mul := nat.one_mul,
|
||
mul_one := nat.mul_one,
|
||
left_distrib := nat.left_distrib,
|
||
right_distrib := nat.right_distrib,
|
||
zero_mul := nat.zero_mul,
|
||
mul_zero := nat.mul_zero,
|
||
mul_comm := nat.mul_comm}
|
||
|
||
/- properties of inequality -/
|
||
|
||
protected lemma le_of_eq {n m : ℕ} (p : n = m) : n ≤ m :=
|
||
p ▸ less_than.refl n
|
||
|
||
lemma le_succ_iff_true (n : ℕ) : n ≤ succ n ↔ true :=
|
||
iff_true_intro (le_succ n)
|
||
|
||
lemma pred_le_iff_true (n : ℕ) : pred n ≤ n ↔ true :=
|
||
iff_true_intro (pred_le n)
|
||
|
||
lemma le_succ_of_le {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : n ≤ succ m :=
|
||
nat.le_trans h (le_succ m)
|
||
|
||
lemma le_of_succ_le {n m : ℕ} (h : succ n ≤ m) : n ≤ m :=
|
||
nat.le_trans (le_succ n) h
|
||
|
||
protected lemma le_of_lt {n m : ℕ} (h : n < m) : n ≤ m :=
|
||
le_of_succ_le h
|
||
|
||
lemma le_succ_of_pred_le {n m : ℕ} : pred n ≤ m → n ≤ succ m :=
|
||
nat.cases_on n less_than.step (λ a, succ_le_succ)
|
||
|
||
lemma succ_le_zero_iff_false (n : ℕ) : succ n ≤ 0 ↔ false :=
|
||
iff_false_intro (not_succ_le_zero n)
|
||
|
||
lemma succ_le_self_iff_false (n : ℕ) : succ n ≤ n ↔ false :=
|
||
iff_false_intro (not_succ_le_self n)
|
||
|
||
lemma zero_le_iff_true (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ n ↔ true :=
|
||
iff_true_intro (zero_le n)
|
||
|
||
def lt.step {n m : ℕ} : n < m → n < succ m := less_than.step
|
||
|
||
lemma zero_lt_succ_iff_true (n : ℕ) : 0 < succ n ↔ true :=
|
||
iff_true_intro (zero_lt_succ n)
|
||
|
||
def succ_pos_iff_true := zero_lt_succ_iff_true
|
||
|
||
protected lemma pos_of_ne_zero {n : nat} (h : n ≠ 0) : n > 0 :=
|
||
begin cases n, contradiction, apply succ_pos end
|
||
|
||
protected lemma lt_trans {n m k : ℕ} (h₁ : n < m) : m < k → n < k :=
|
||
nat.le_trans (less_than.step h₁)
|
||
|
||
protected lemma lt_of_le_of_lt {n m k : ℕ} (h₁ : n ≤ m) : m < k → n < k :=
|
||
nat.le_trans (succ_le_succ h₁)
|
||
|
||
lemma lt_self_iff_false (n : ℕ) : n < n ↔ false :=
|
||
iff_false_intro (λ h, absurd h (nat.lt_irrefl n))
|
||
|
||
lemma self_lt_succ (n : ℕ) : n < succ n := nat.le_refl (succ n)
|
||
|
||
def lt_succ_self := @self_lt_succ
|
||
|
||
lemma self_lt_succ_iff_true (n : ℕ) : n < succ n ↔ true :=
|
||
iff_true_intro (self_lt_succ n)
|
||
|
||
def lt_succ_self_iff_true := @self_lt_succ_iff_true
|
||
|
||
def lt.base (n : ℕ) : n < succ n := nat.le_refl (succ n)
|
||
|
||
lemma le_lt_antisymm {n m : ℕ} (h₁ : n ≤ m) (h₂ : m < n) : false :=
|
||
nat.lt_irrefl n (nat.lt_of_le_of_lt h₁ h₂)
|
||
|
||
protected lemma le_antisymm {n m : ℕ} (h₁ : n ≤ m) : m ≤ n → n = m :=
|
||
less_than.cases_on h₁ (λ a, rfl) (λ a b c, absurd (nat.lt_of_le_of_lt b c) (nat.lt_irrefl n))
|
||
|
||
instance : weak_order ℕ :=
|
||
⟨@nat.less_than, @nat.le_refl, @nat.le_trans, @nat.le_antisymm⟩
|
||
|
||
lemma lt_le_antisymm {n m : ℕ} (h₁ : n < m) (h₂ : m ≤ n) : false :=
|
||
le_lt_antisymm h₂ h₁
|
||
|
||
protected lemma nat.lt_asymm {n m : ℕ} (h₁ : n < m) : ¬ m < n :=
|
||
le_lt_antisymm (nat.le_of_lt h₁)
|
||
|
||
lemma lt_zero_iff_false (a : ℕ) : a < 0 ↔ false :=
|
||
iff_false_intro (not_lt_zero a)
|
||
|
||
protected lemma le_of_eq_or_lt {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b ∨ a < b) : a ≤ b :=
|
||
or.elim h nat.le_of_eq nat.le_of_lt
|
||
|
||
lemma succ_lt_succ {a b : ℕ} : a < b → succ a < succ b :=
|
||
succ_le_succ
|
||
|
||
lemma lt_of_succ_lt {a b : ℕ} : succ a < b → a < b :=
|
||
le_of_succ_le
|
||
|
||
lemma lt_of_succ_lt_succ {a b : ℕ} : succ a < succ b → a < b :=
|
||
le_of_succ_le_succ
|
||
|
||
protected lemma lt_or_ge : ∀ (a b : ℕ), a < b ∨ a ≥ b
|
||
| a 0 := or.inr (zero_le a)
|
||
| a (b+1) :=
|
||
match lt_or_ge a b with
|
||
| or.inl h := or.inl (le_succ_of_le h)
|
||
| or.inr h :=
|
||
match nat.eq_or_lt_of_le h with
|
||
| or.inl h1 := or.inl (h1 ▸ self_lt_succ b)
|
||
| or.inr h1 := or.inr h1
|
||
end
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
protected def {u} lt_ge_by_cases {a b : ℕ} {C : Type u} (h₁ : a < b → C) (h₂ : a ≥ b → C) : C :=
|
||
decidable.by_cases h₁ (λ h, h₂ (or.elim (nat.lt_or_ge a b) (λ a, absurd a h) (λ a, a)))
|
||
|
||
protected def {u} lt_by_cases {a b : ℕ} {C : Type u} (h₁ : a < b → C) (h₂ : a = b → C)
|
||
(h₃ : b < a → C) : C :=
|
||
nat.lt_ge_by_cases h₁ (λ h₁,
|
||
nat.lt_ge_by_cases h₃ (λ h, h₂ (nat.le_antisymm h h₁)))
|
||
|
||
protected lemma lt_trichotomy (a b : ℕ) : a < b ∨ a = b ∨ b < a :=
|
||
nat.lt_by_cases (λ h, or.inl h) (λ h, or.inr (or.inl h)) (λ h, or.inr (or.inr h))
|
||
|
||
protected lemma eq_or_lt_of_not_lt {a b : ℕ} (hnlt : ¬ a < b) : a = b ∨ b < a :=
|
||
or.elim (nat.lt_trichotomy a b)
|
||
(λ hlt, absurd hlt hnlt)
|
||
(λ h, h)
|
||
|
||
lemma lt_of_succ_le {a b : ℕ} (h : succ a ≤ b) : a < b := h
|
||
|
||
lemma succ_le_of_lt {a b : ℕ} (h : a < b) : succ a ≤ b := h
|
||
|
||
lemma le_add_right : ∀ (n k : ℕ), n ≤ n + k
|
||
| n 0 := nat.le_refl n
|
||
| n (k+1) := le_succ_of_le (le_add_right n k)
|
||
|
||
lemma le_add_left (n m : ℕ): n ≤ m + n :=
|
||
nat.add_comm n m ▸ le_add_right n m
|
||
|
||
lemma le.dest : ∀ {n m : ℕ}, n ≤ m → ∃ k, n + k = m
|
||
| n .n (less_than.refl .n) := ⟨0, rfl⟩
|
||
| n .(succ m) (@less_than.step .n m h) :=
|
||
match le.dest h with
|
||
| ⟨w, hw⟩ := ⟨succ w, hw ▸ add_succ n w⟩
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
lemma le.intro {n m k : ℕ} (h : n + k = m) : n ≤ m :=
|
||
h ▸ le_add_right n k
|
||
|
||
protected lemma add_le_add_left {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) (k : ℕ) : k + n ≤ k + m :=
|
||
match le.dest h with
|
||
| ⟨w, hw⟩ := @le.intro _ _ w begin rw [nat.add_assoc, hw] end
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
protected lemma add_le_add_right {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) (k : ℕ) : n + k ≤ m + k :=
|
||
begin rw [nat.add_comm n k, nat.add_comm m k], apply nat.add_le_add_left h end
|
||
|
||
protected lemma le_of_add_le_add_left {k n m : ℕ} (h : k + n ≤ k + m) : n ≤ m :=
|
||
match le.dest h with
|
||
| ⟨w, hw⟩ := @le.intro _ _ w
|
||
begin
|
||
dsimp at hw,
|
||
rw [nat.add_assoc] at hw,
|
||
apply nat.add_left_cancel hw
|
||
end
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
protected lemma lt_of_le_and_ne {m n : ℕ} (h1 : m ≤ n) : m ≠ n → m < n :=
|
||
or.resolve_right (or.swap (nat.eq_or_lt_of_le h1))
|
||
|
||
protected theorem lt_of_add_lt_add_left {k n m : ℕ} (h : k + n < k + m) : n < m :=
|
||
let h' := nat.le_of_lt h in
|
||
nat.lt_of_le_and_ne
|
||
(nat.le_of_add_le_add_left h')
|
||
(λ heq, nat.lt_irrefl (k + m) begin rw heq at h, assumption end)
|
||
|
||
protected lemma add_lt_add_left {n m : ℕ} (h : n < m) (k : ℕ) : k + n < k + m :=
|
||
lt_of_succ_le (add_succ k n ▸ nat.add_le_add_left (succ_le_of_lt h) k)
|
||
|
||
protected lemma add_lt_add_right {n m : ℕ} (h : n < m) (k : ℕ) : n + k < m + k :=
|
||
nat.add_comm k m ▸ nat.add_comm k n ▸ nat.add_lt_add_left h k
|
||
|
||
protected lemma lt_add_of_pos_right {n k : ℕ} (h : k > 0) : n < n + k :=
|
||
nat.add_lt_add_left h n
|
||
|
||
protected lemma zero_lt_one : 0 < (1:nat) :=
|
||
zero_lt_succ 0
|
||
|
||
def one_pos := nat.zero_lt_one
|
||
|
||
protected lemma le_total {m n : ℕ} : m ≤ n ∨ n ≤ m :=
|
||
or.imp_left nat.le_of_lt (nat.lt_or_ge m n)
|
||
|
||
protected lemma le_of_lt_or_eq {m n : ℕ} (h : m < n ∨ m = n) : m ≤ n :=
|
||
nat.le_of_eq_or_lt (or.swap h)
|
||
|
||
protected lemma lt_or_eq_of_le {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : m < n ∨ m = n :=
|
||
or.swap (nat.eq_or_lt_of_le h)
|
||
|
||
protected lemma le_iff_lt_or_eq (m n : ℕ) : m ≤ n ↔ m < n ∨ m = n :=
|
||
iff.intro nat.lt_or_eq_of_le nat.le_of_lt_or_eq
|
||
|
||
lemma mul_le_mul_left {n m : ℕ} (k : ℕ) (h : n ≤ m) : k * n ≤ k * m :=
|
||
match le.dest h with
|
||
| ⟨l, hl⟩ :=
|
||
have k * n + k * l = k * m, by rw [-left_distrib, hl],
|
||
le.intro this
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
lemma mul_le_mul_right {n m : ℕ} (k : ℕ) (h : n ≤ m) : n * k ≤ m * k :=
|
||
mul_comm k m ▸ mul_comm k n ▸ mul_le_mul_left k h
|
||
|
||
protected lemma mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left {n m k : ℕ} (h : n < m) (hk : k > 0) : k * n < k * m :=
|
||
nat.lt_of_lt_of_le (nat.lt_add_of_pos_right hk) (mul_succ k n ▸ nat.mul_le_mul_left k (succ_le_of_lt h))
|
||
|
||
protected lemma mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right {n m k : ℕ} (h : n < m) (hk : k > 0) : n * k < m * k :=
|
||
mul_comm k m ▸ mul_comm k n ▸ nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h hk
|
||
|
||
instance : decidable_linear_ordered_semiring nat :=
|
||
{ nat.comm_semiring with
|
||
add_left_cancel := @nat.add_left_cancel,
|
||
add_right_cancel := @nat.add_right_cancel,
|
||
lt := nat.lt,
|
||
le := nat.le,
|
||
le_refl := nat.le_refl,
|
||
le_trans := @nat.le_trans,
|
||
le_antisymm := @nat.le_antisymm,
|
||
le_total := @nat.le_total,
|
||
le_iff_lt_or_eq := @nat.le_iff_lt_or_eq,
|
||
le_of_lt := @nat.le_of_lt,
|
||
lt_irrefl := @nat.lt_irrefl,
|
||
lt_of_lt_of_le := @nat.lt_of_lt_of_le,
|
||
lt_of_le_of_lt := @nat.lt_of_le_of_lt,
|
||
lt_of_add_lt_add_left := @nat.lt_of_add_lt_add_left,
|
||
add_lt_add_left := @nat.add_lt_add_left,
|
||
add_le_add_left := @nat.add_le_add_left,
|
||
le_of_add_le_add_left := @nat.le_of_add_le_add_left,
|
||
zero_lt_one := zero_lt_succ 0,
|
||
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left := (take a b c h₁ h₂, nat.mul_le_mul_left c h₁),
|
||
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right := (take a b c h₁ h₂, nat.mul_le_mul_right c h₁),
|
||
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left := @nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left,
|
||
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right := @nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right,
|
||
decidable_lt := nat.decidable_lt,
|
||
decidable_le := nat.decidable_le,
|
||
decidable_eq := nat.decidable_eq }
|
||
|
||
lemma le_of_lt_succ {m n : nat} : m < succ n → m ≤ n :=
|
||
le_of_succ_le_succ
|
||
|
||
/- sub properties -/
|
||
|
||
lemma sub_eq_succ_sub_succ (a b : ℕ) : a - b = succ a - succ b :=
|
||
eq.symm (succ_sub_succ_eq_sub a b)
|
||
|
||
lemma zero_sub_eq_zero : ∀ a : ℕ, 0 - a = 0
|
||
| 0 := rfl
|
||
| (a+1) := congr_arg pred (zero_sub_eq_zero a)
|
||
|
||
lemma zero_eq_zero_sub (a : ℕ) : 0 = 0 - a :=
|
||
eq.symm (zero_sub_eq_zero a)
|
||
|
||
lemma sub_le_iff_true (a b : ℕ) : a - b ≤ a ↔ true :=
|
||
iff_true_intro (sub_le a b)
|
||
|
||
lemma sub_lt_succ (a b : ℕ) : a - b < succ a :=
|
||
lt_succ_of_le (sub_le a b)
|
||
|
||
lemma sub_lt_succ_iff_true (a b : ℕ) : a - b < succ a ↔ true :=
|
||
iff_true_intro (sub_lt_succ a b)
|
||
|
||
/- bit0/bit1 properties -/
|
||
|
||
protected lemma bit0_succ_eq (n : ℕ) : bit0 (succ n) = succ (succ (bit0 n)) :=
|
||
show succ (succ n + n) = succ (succ (n + n)), from
|
||
congr_arg succ (succ_add n n)
|
||
|
||
protected lemma bit1_eq_succ_bit0 (n : ℕ) : bit1 n = succ (bit0 n) :=
|
||
rfl
|
||
|
||
protected lemma bit1_succ_eq (n : ℕ) : bit1 (succ n) = succ (succ (bit1 n)) :=
|
||
eq.trans (nat.bit1_eq_succ_bit0 (succ n)) (congr_arg succ (nat.bit0_succ_eq n))
|
||
|
||
protected lemma bit0_ne_zero : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → bit0 n ≠ 0
|
||
| 0 h := absurd rfl h
|
||
| (n+1) h := succ_ne_zero _
|
||
|
||
protected lemma bit1_ne_zero (n : ℕ) : bit1 n ≠ 0 :=
|
||
show succ (n + n) ≠ 0, from
|
||
succ_ne_zero (n + n)
|
||
|
||
protected lemma bit1_ne_one : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → bit1 n ≠ 1
|
||
| 0 h h1 := absurd rfl h
|
||
| (n+1) h h1 := nat.no_confusion h1 (λ h2, absurd h2 (succ_ne_zero _))
|
||
|
||
protected lemma bit0_ne_one : ∀ n : ℕ, bit0 n ≠ 1
|
||
| 0 h := absurd h (ne.symm nat.one_ne_zero)
|
||
| (n+1) h :=
|
||
have h1 : succ (succ (n + n)) = 1, from succ_add n n ▸ h,
|
||
nat.no_confusion h1
|
||
(λ h2, absurd h2 (succ_ne_zero (n + n)))
|
||
|
||
protected lemma add_self_ne_one : ∀ (n : ℕ), n + n ≠ 1
|
||
| 0 h := nat.no_confusion h
|
||
| (n+1) h :=
|
||
have h1 : succ (succ (n + n)) = 1, from succ_add n n ▸ h,
|
||
nat.no_confusion h1 (λ h2, absurd h2 (nat.succ_ne_zero (n + n)))
|
||
|
||
protected lemma bit1_ne_bit0 : ∀ (n m : ℕ), bit1 n ≠ bit0 m
|
||
| 0 m h := absurd h (ne.symm (nat.add_self_ne_one m))
|
||
| (n+1) 0 h :=
|
||
have h1 : succ (bit0 (succ n)) = 0, from h,
|
||
absurd h1 (nat.succ_ne_zero _)
|
||
| (n+1) (m+1) h :=
|
||
have h1 : succ (succ (bit1 n)) = succ (succ (bit0 m)), from
|
||
nat.bit0_succ_eq m ▸ nat.bit1_succ_eq n ▸ h,
|
||
have h2 : bit1 n = bit0 m, from
|
||
nat.no_confusion h1 (λ h2', nat.no_confusion h2' (λ h2'', h2'')),
|
||
absurd h2 (bit1_ne_bit0 n m)
|
||
|
||
protected lemma bit0_ne_bit1 : ∀ (n m : ℕ), bit0 n ≠ bit1 m :=
|
||
λ n m : nat, ne.symm (nat.bit1_ne_bit0 m n)
|
||
|
||
protected lemma bit0_inj : ∀ {n m : ℕ}, bit0 n = bit0 m → n = m
|
||
| 0 0 h := rfl
|
||
| 0 (m+1) h := by contradiction
|
||
| (n+1) 0 h := by contradiction
|
||
| (n+1) (m+1) h :=
|
||
have succ (succ (n + n)) = succ (succ (m + m)),
|
||
begin unfold bit0 at h, simp [add_one_eq_succ, add_succ, succ_add] at h, exact h end,
|
||
have n + n = m + m, begin repeat {injection this with this}, assumption end,
|
||
have n = m, from bit0_inj this,
|
||
by rw this
|
||
|
||
protected lemma bit1_inj : ∀ {n m : ℕ}, bit1 n = bit1 m → n = m :=
|
||
λ n m h,
|
||
have succ (bit0 n) = succ (bit0 m), begin simp [nat.bit1_eq_succ_bit0] at h, assumption end,
|
||
have bit0 n = bit0 m, from begin injection this, assumption end,
|
||
nat.bit0_inj this
|
||
|
||
protected lemma bit0_ne {n m : ℕ} : n ≠ m → bit0 n ≠ bit0 m :=
|
||
λ h₁ h₂, absurd (nat.bit0_inj h₂) h₁
|
||
|
||
protected lemma bit1_ne {n m : ℕ} : n ≠ m → bit1 n ≠ bit1 m :=
|
||
λ h₁ h₂, absurd (nat.bit1_inj h₂) h₁
|
||
|
||
protected lemma zero_ne_bit0 {n : ℕ} : n ≠ 0 → 0 ≠ bit0 n :=
|
||
λ h, ne.symm (nat.bit0_ne_zero h)
|
||
|
||
protected lemma zero_ne_bit1 (n : ℕ) : 0 ≠ bit1 n :=
|
||
ne.symm (nat.bit1_ne_zero n)
|
||
|
||
protected lemma one_ne_bit0 (n : ℕ) : 1 ≠ bit0 n :=
|
||
ne.symm (nat.bit0_ne_one n)
|
||
|
||
protected lemma one_ne_bit1 {n : ℕ} : n ≠ 0 → 1 ≠ bit1 n :=
|
||
λ h, ne.symm (nat.bit1_ne_one h)
|
||
|
||
protected lemma zero_lt_bit1 (n : nat) : 0 < bit1 n :=
|
||
zero_lt_succ _
|
||
|
||
protected lemma zero_lt_bit0 : ∀ {n : nat}, n ≠ 0 → 0 < bit0 n
|
||
| 0 h := by contradiction
|
||
| (succ n) h :=
|
||
begin
|
||
rw nat.bit0_succ_eq,
|
||
apply zero_lt_succ
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
protected lemma one_lt_bit1 : ∀ {n : nat}, n ≠ 0 → 1 < bit1 n
|
||
| 0 h := by contradiction
|
||
| (succ n) h :=
|
||
begin
|
||
rw nat.bit1_succ_eq,
|
||
apply succ_lt_succ,
|
||
apply zero_lt_succ
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
protected lemma one_lt_bit0 : ∀ {n : nat}, n ≠ 0 → 1 < bit0 n
|
||
| 0 h := by contradiction
|
||
| (succ n) h :=
|
||
begin
|
||
rw nat.bit0_succ_eq,
|
||
apply succ_lt_succ,
|
||
apply zero_lt_succ
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
protected lemma bit0_lt {n m : nat} (h : n < m) : bit0 n < bit0 m :=
|
||
add_lt_add h h
|
||
|
||
protected lemma bit1_lt {n m : nat} (h : n < m) : bit1 n < bit1 m :=
|
||
succ_lt_succ (add_lt_add h h)
|
||
|
||
protected lemma bit0_lt_bit1 {n m : nat} (h : n ≤ m) : bit0 n < bit1 m :=
|
||
lt_succ_of_le (add_le_add h h)
|
||
|
||
protected lemma bit1_lt_bit0 : ∀ {n m : nat}, n < m → bit1 n < bit0 m
|
||
| n 0 h := absurd h (not_lt_zero _)
|
||
| n (succ m) h :=
|
||
have n ≤ m, from le_of_lt_succ h,
|
||
have succ (n + n) ≤ succ (m + m), from succ_le_succ (add_le_add this this),
|
||
have succ (n + n) ≤ succ m + m, {rw succ_add, assumption},
|
||
show succ (n + n) < succ (succ m + m), from lt_succ_of_le this
|
||
|
||
protected lemma one_le_bit1 (n : ℕ) : 1 ≤ bit1 n :=
|
||
show 1 ≤ succ (bit0 n), from
|
||
succ_le_succ (zero_le (bit0 n))
|
||
|
||
protected lemma one_le_bit0 : ∀ (n : ℕ), n ≠ 0 → 1 ≤ bit0 n
|
||
| 0 h := absurd rfl h
|
||
| (n+1) h :=
|
||
suffices 1 ≤ succ (succ (bit0 n)), from
|
||
eq.symm (nat.bit0_succ_eq n) ▸ this,
|
||
succ_le_succ (zero_le (succ (bit0 n)))
|
||
|
||
/- Extra instances to short-circuit type class resolution -/
|
||
instance : add_comm_monoid nat := by apply_instance
|
||
instance : add_monoid nat := by apply_instance
|
||
instance : monoid nat := by apply_instance
|
||
instance : comm_monoid nat := by apply_instance
|
||
instance : comm_semigroup nat := by apply_instance
|
||
instance : semigroup nat := by apply_instance
|
||
instance : add_comm_semigroup nat := by apply_instance
|
||
instance : add_semigroup nat := by apply_instance
|
||
instance : distrib nat := by apply_instance
|
||
instance : semiring nat := by apply_instance
|
||
instance : ordered_semiring nat := by apply_instance
|
||
|
||
/- subtraction -/
|
||
protected theorem sub_zero (n : ℕ) : n - 0 = n :=
|
||
rfl
|
||
|
||
theorem sub_succ (n m : ℕ) : n - succ m = pred (n - m) :=
|
||
rfl
|
||
|
||
protected theorem zero_sub : ∀ (n : ℕ), 0 - n = 0
|
||
| 0 := by rw nat.sub_zero
|
||
| (succ n) := by rw [nat.sub_succ, zero_sub n, pred_zero]
|
||
|
||
theorem succ_sub_succ (n m : ℕ) : succ n - succ m = n - m :=
|
||
succ_sub_succ_eq_sub n m
|
||
|
||
protected theorem sub_self : ∀ (n : ℕ), n - n = 0
|
||
| 0 := by rw nat.sub_zero
|
||
| (succ n) := by rw [succ_sub_succ, sub_self n]
|
||
|
||
protected theorem add_sub_add_right : ∀ (n k m : ℕ), (n + k) - (m + k) = n - m
|
||
| n 0 m := by rw [add_zero, add_zero]
|
||
| n (succ k) m := by rw [add_succ, add_succ, succ_sub_succ, add_sub_add_right n k m]
|
||
|
||
protected theorem add_sub_add_left (k n m : ℕ) : (k + n) - (k + m) = n - m :=
|
||
by rw [add_comm k n, add_comm k m, nat.add_sub_add_right]
|
||
|
||
protected theorem add_sub_cancel (n m : ℕ) : n + m - m = n :=
|
||
suffices n + m - (0 + m) = n, from
|
||
by rwa [zero_add] at this,
|
||
by rw [nat.add_sub_add_right, nat.sub_zero]
|
||
|
||
protected theorem add_sub_cancel_left (n m : ℕ) : n + m - n = m :=
|
||
show n + m - (n + 0) = m, from
|
||
by rw [nat.add_sub_add_left, nat.sub_zero]
|
||
|
||
protected theorem sub_sub : ∀ (n m k : ℕ), n - m - k = n - (m + k)
|
||
| n m 0 := by rw [add_zero, nat.sub_zero]
|
||
| n m (succ k) := by rw [add_succ, nat.sub_succ, nat.sub_succ, sub_sub n m k]
|
||
|
||
theorem succ_sub_sub_succ (n m k : ℕ) : succ n - m - succ k = n - m - k :=
|
||
by rw [nat.sub_sub, nat.sub_sub, add_succ, succ_sub_succ]
|
||
|
||
theorem sub_self_add (n m : ℕ) : n - (n + m) = 0 :=
|
||
show (n + 0) - (n + m) = 0, from
|
||
by rw [nat.add_sub_add_left, nat.zero_sub]
|
||
|
||
protected theorem sub.right_comm (m n k : ℕ) : m - n - k = m - k - n :=
|
||
by rw [nat.sub_sub, nat.sub_sub, add_comm]
|
||
|
||
theorem sub_one (n : ℕ) : n - 1 = pred n :=
|
||
rfl
|
||
|
||
theorem succ_sub_one (n : ℕ) : succ n - 1 = n :=
|
||
rfl
|
||
|
||
theorem succ_pred_eq_of_pos : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n > 0 → succ (pred n) = n
|
||
| 0 h := absurd h (lt_irrefl 0)
|
||
| (succ k) h := rfl
|
||
|
||
theorem mul_pred_left : ∀ (n m : ℕ), pred n * m = n * m - m
|
||
| 0 m := by simp [nat.zero_sub, pred_zero, zero_mul]
|
||
| (succ n) m := by rw [pred_succ, succ_mul, nat.add_sub_cancel]
|
||
|
||
theorem mul_pred_right (n m : ℕ) : n * pred m = n * m - n :=
|
||
by rw [mul_comm, mul_pred_left, mul_comm]
|
||
|
||
protected theorem mul_sub_right_distrib : ∀ (n m k : ℕ), (n - m) * k = n * k - m * k
|
||
| n 0 k := by simp [nat.sub_zero]
|
||
| n (succ m) k := by rw [nat.sub_succ, mul_pred_left, mul_sub_right_distrib, succ_mul, nat.sub_sub]
|
||
|
||
protected theorem mul_sub_left_distrib (n m k : ℕ) : n * (m - k) = n * m - n * k :=
|
||
by rw [mul_comm, nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, mul_comm m n, mul_comm n k]
|
||
|
||
protected theorem mul_self_sub_mul_self_eq (a b : nat) : a * a - b * b = (a + b) * (a - b) :=
|
||
by rw [nat.mul_sub_left_distrib, right_distrib, right_distrib, mul_comm b a, add_comm (a*a) (a*b),
|
||
nat.add_sub_add_left]
|
||
|
||
theorem succ_mul_succ_eq (a : nat) : succ a * succ a = a*a + a + a + 1 :=
|
||
begin rw [-add_one_eq_succ], simp [right_distrib, left_distrib] end
|
||
|
||
theorem sub_eq_zero_of_le {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : n - m = 0 :=
|
||
exists.elim (nat.le.dest h)
|
||
(take k, assume hk : n + k = m, by rw [-hk, sub_self_add])
|
||
|
||
theorem succ_sub {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≥ n) : succ m - n = succ (m - n) :=
|
||
exists.elim (nat.le.dest h)
|
||
(take k, assume hk : n + k = m,
|
||
by rw [-hk, nat.add_sub_cancel_left, -add_succ, nat.add_sub_cancel_left])
|
||
|
||
theorem add_sub_of_le {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : n + (m - n) = m :=
|
||
exists.elim (nat.le.dest h)
|
||
(take k, assume hk : n + k = m,
|
||
by rw [-hk, nat.add_sub_cancel_left])
|
||
|
||
protected theorem sub_add_cancel {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≥ m) : n - m + m = n :=
|
||
by rw [add_comm, add_sub_of_le h]
|
||
|
||
protected theorem sub_pos_of_lt {m n : ℕ} (h : m < n) : n - m > 0 :=
|
||
have 0 + m < n - m + m, begin rw [zero_add, nat.sub_add_cancel (le_of_lt h)], exact h end,
|
||
lt_of_add_lt_add_right this
|
||
|
||
protected theorem add_sub_assoc {m k : ℕ} (h : k ≤ m) (n : ℕ) : n + m - k = n + (m - k) :=
|
||
exists.elim (nat.le.dest h)
|
||
(take l, assume hl : k + l = m,
|
||
by rw [-hl, nat.add_sub_cancel_left, add_comm k, -add_assoc, nat.add_sub_cancel])
|
||
|
||
lemma min_zero_left (a : ℕ) : min 0 a = 0 :=
|
||
min_eq_left (zero_le a)
|
||
|
||
lemma min_zero_right (a : ℕ) : min a 0 = 0 :=
|
||
min_eq_right (zero_le a)
|
||
|
||
-- Distribute succ over min
|
||
lemma min_succ_succ (x y : ℕ) : min (succ x) (succ y) = succ (min x y) :=
|
||
have f : x ≤ y → min (succ x) (succ y) = succ (min x y), from λp,
|
||
calc min (succ x) (succ y)
|
||
= succ x : if_pos (succ_le_succ p)
|
||
... = succ (min x y) : congr_arg succ (eq.symm (if_pos p)),
|
||
have g : ¬ (x ≤ y) → min (succ x) (succ y) = succ (min x y), from λp,
|
||
calc min (succ x) (succ y)
|
||
= succ y : if_neg (λeq, p (pred_le_pred eq))
|
||
... = succ (min x y) : congr_arg succ (eq.symm (if_neg p)),
|
||
decidable.by_cases f g
|
||
|
||
lemma sub_eq_sub_min (n m : ℕ) : n - m = n - min n m :=
|
||
if h : n ≥ m then by rewrite [min_eq_right h]
|
||
else by rewrite [sub_eq_zero_of_le (le_of_not_ge h), min_eq_left (le_of_not_ge h), nat.sub_self]
|
||
|
||
lemma sub_add_min_cancel (n m : ℕ) : n - m + min n m = n :=
|
||
by rewrite [sub_eq_sub_min, nat.sub_add_cancel (min_le_left n m)]
|
||
|
||
lemma pred_inj : ∀ {a b : nat}, a > 0 → b > 0 → nat.pred a = nat.pred b → a = b
|
||
| (succ a) (succ b) ha hb h := have a = b, from h, by rw this
|
||
| (succ a) 0 ha hb h := absurd hb (lt_irrefl _)
|
||
| 0 (succ b) ha hb h := absurd ha (lt_irrefl _)
|
||
| 0 0 ha hb h := rfl
|
||
|
||
/- TODO(Leo): sub + inequalities -/
|
||
|
||
|
||
end nat
|