lean4-htt/tests/lean/run/5634.lean
Marc Huisinga 9d427fdfcf
feat: "try this" messages with support for interactivity (#10524)
This PR adds support for interactivity to the combined "try this"
messages that were introduced in #9966. In doing so, it moves the link
to apply a suggestion to a separate `[apply]` button in front of the
suggestion. Hints with diffs remain unchanged, as they did not
previously support interacting with terms in the diff, either.

<img width="379" height="256" alt="Suggestion with interactive message"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7838ebf6-0613-46e7-bc88-468a05acbf51"
/>
2025-10-13 13:39:03 +00:00

114 lines
2.3 KiB
Text
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

/-!
# Make sure `simpa` checks for metavariables in `using` clause
https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/5634
-/
set_option linter.unnecessarySimpa true
/-!
This used to have a "don't know how to synthesize placeholder" error on the `have` line too.
This is because `have` is `refine_lift have ...; ?_`, so it indeed had a placeholder.
-/
/--
error: don't know how to synthesize placeholder for argument `a`
context:
htrue : True
⊢ False
---
error: unsolved goals
htrue : True
⊢ False
-/
#guard_msgs in
example : False := by
have htrue : True := trivial
simpa using id _
/-!
Simplified version of the test.
-/
/--
error: don't know how to synthesize placeholder for argument `a`
context:
⊢ False
---
error: unsolved goals
⊢ False
-/
#guard_msgs in
example : False := by
refine ?_
simpa using id ?_
/-!
Verifying that unassigned metavariables are OK, so long as they come from before elaboring the `using` clause.
-/
example (p : Prop) (h : p) : p := by
have : ?a := ?b
simpa using ?b
exact h
/-!
Occurs check
-/
/--
error: Occurs check failed: Expression
?foo
contains the goal ?foo
-/
#guard_msgs in
example : False := by
refine ?foo
simpa using ?foo
/-!
Regression test: need to synthesize postponed metavariables before metavariable checks.
-/
example (α : Type) (x : α) : Nonempty α := by
simpa using ⟨x⟩
/-!
Regression test: elaborates implicit arguments in the `using` clause
-/
noncomputable example (α : Type) [Nonempty α] : α := by
simpa using fun {β : Type} [inst : Nonempty β] => Classical.choice inst
/-!
Regression test: elaborates using implicit lambda feature
-/
example (p : Prop) (h : p) : ∀ {_ : Nat}, p := by
simpa using h
/-!
Regression test: make sure `simpa?` reports lemmas for both the goal and the `using` clause
-/
/--
info: Try this:
[apply] simpa only [id] using h
-/
#guard_msgs in example (p : Prop) (h : p) : id p := by
simpa? only [id] using h
/--
info: Try this:
[apply] simpa only [id] using h
-/
#guard_msgs in example (p : Prop) (h : id p) : p := by
simpa? only [id] using h
/-!
Regression test: unnecessary `simpa`
-/
def foo (n : α) := [n]
/--
warning: Try `simp at h` instead of `simpa using h`
Note: This linter can be disabled with `set_option linter.unnecessarySimpa false`
-/
#guard_msgs in
example (h : foo n ≠ [n]) : False := by
simpa [foo] using h