lean4-htt/src/Init/Data/Array/Attach.lean
Kim Morrison 63132105ba
feat: lemmas about for loops over Array (#6055)
This PR adds lemmas about for loops over `Array`, following the existing
lemmas for `List`.
2024-11-13 23:23:55 +00:00

185 lines
7.5 KiB
Text
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joachim Breitner, Mario Carneiro
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Array.Mem
import Init.Data.Array.Lemmas
import Init.Data.List.Attach
namespace Array
/--
Unsafe implementation of `attachWith`, taking advantage of the fact that the representation of
`Array {x // P x}` is the same as the input `Array α`.
-/
@[inline] private unsafe def attachWithImpl
(xs : Array α) (P : α → Prop) (_ : ∀ x ∈ xs, P x) : Array {x // P x} := unsafeCast xs
/-- `O(1)`. "Attach" a proof `P x` that holds for all the elements of `xs` to produce a new array
with the same elements but in the type `{x // P x}`. -/
@[implemented_by attachWithImpl] def attachWith
(xs : Array α) (P : α → Prop) (H : ∀ x ∈ xs, P x) : Array {x // P x} :=
⟨xs.toList.attachWith P fun x h => H x (Array.Mem.mk h)⟩
/-- `O(1)`. "Attach" the proof that the elements of `xs` are in `xs` to produce a new array
with the same elements but in the type `{x // x ∈ xs}`. -/
@[inline] def attach (xs : Array α) : Array {x // x ∈ xs} := xs.attachWith _ fun _ => id
@[simp] theorem _root_.List.attachWith_toArray {l : List α} {P : α → Prop} {H : ∀ x ∈ l.toArray, P x} :
l.toArray.attachWith P H = (l.attachWith P (by simpa using H)).toArray := by
simp [attachWith]
@[simp] theorem _root_.List.attach_toArray {l : List α} :
l.toArray.attach = (l.attachWith (· ∈ l.toArray) (by simp)).toArray := by
simp [attach]
@[simp] theorem toList_attachWith {l : Array α} {P : α → Prop} {H : ∀ x ∈ l, P x} :
(l.attachWith P H).toList = l.toList.attachWith P (by simpa [mem_toList] using H) := by
simp [attachWith]
@[simp] theorem toList_attach {α : Type _} {l : Array α} :
l.attach.toList = l.toList.attachWith (· ∈ l) (by simp [mem_toList]) := by
simp [attach]
@[simp] theorem _root_.List.attachWith_mem_toArray {l : List α} :
l.attachWith (fun x => x ∈ l.toArray) (fun x h => by simpa using h) =
l.attach.map fun ⟨x, h⟩ => ⟨x, by simpa using h⟩ := by
simp only [List.attachWith, List.attach, List.map_pmap]
apply List.pmap_congr_left
simp
/-! ## unattach
`Array.unattach` is the (one-sided) inverse of `Array.attach`. It is a synonym for `Array.map Subtype.val`.
We use it by providing a simp lemma `l.attach.unattach = l`, and simp lemmas which recognize higher order
functions applied to `l : Array { x // p x }` which only depend on the value, not the predicate, and rewrite these
in terms of a simpler function applied to `l.unattach`.
Further, we provide simp lemmas that push `unattach` inwards.
-/
/--
A synonym for `l.map (·.val)`. Mostly this should not be needed by users.
It is introduced as in intermediate step by lemmas such as `map_subtype`,
and is ideally subsequently simplified away by `unattach_attach`.
If not, usually the right approach is `simp [Array.unattach, -Array.map_subtype]` to unfold.
-/
def unattach {α : Type _} {p : α → Prop} (l : Array { x // p x }) := l.map (·.val)
@[simp] theorem unattach_nil {p : α → Prop} : (#[] : Array { x // p x }).unattach = #[] := rfl
@[simp] theorem unattach_push {p : α → Prop} {a : { x // p x }} {l : Array { x // p x }} :
(l.push a).unattach = l.unattach.push a.1 := by
simp only [unattach, Array.map_push]
@[simp] theorem size_unattach {p : α → Prop} {l : Array { x // p x }} :
l.unattach.size = l.size := by
unfold unattach
simp
@[simp] theorem _root_.List.unattach_toArray {p : α → Prop} {l : List { x // p x }} :
l.toArray.unattach = l.unattach.toArray := by
simp only [unattach, List.map_toArray, List.unattach]
@[simp] theorem toList_unattach {p : α → Prop} {l : Array { x // p x }} :
l.unattach.toList = l.toList.unattach := by
simp only [unattach, toList_map, List.unattach]
@[simp] theorem unattach_attach {l : Array α} : l.attach.unattach = l := by
cases l
simp only [List.attach_toArray, List.unattach_toArray, List.unattach_attachWith]
@[simp] theorem unattach_attachWith {p : α → Prop} {l : Array α}
{H : ∀ a ∈ l, p a} :
(l.attachWith p H).unattach = l := by
cases l
simp
/-! ### Recognizing higher order functions using a function that only depends on the value. -/
/--
This lemma identifies folds over arrays of subtypes, where the function only depends on the value, not the proposition,
and simplifies these to the function directly taking the value.
-/
theorem foldl_subtype {p : α → Prop} {l : Array { x // p x }}
{f : β → { x // p x } → β} {g : β → α → β} {x : β}
{hf : ∀ b x h, f b ⟨x, h⟩ = g b x} :
l.foldl f x = l.unattach.foldl g x := by
cases l
simp only [List.foldl_toArray', List.unattach_toArray]
rw [List.foldl_subtype] -- Why can't simp do this?
simp [hf]
/-- Variant of `foldl_subtype` with side condition to check `stop = l.size`. -/
@[simp] theorem foldl_subtype' {p : α → Prop} {l : Array { x // p x }}
{f : β → { x // p x } → β} {g : β → α → β} {x : β}
{hf : ∀ b x h, f b ⟨x, h⟩ = g b x} (h : stop = l.size) :
l.foldl f x 0 stop = l.unattach.foldl g x := by
subst h
rwa [foldl_subtype]
/--
This lemma identifies folds over arrays of subtypes, where the function only depends on the value, not the proposition,
and simplifies these to the function directly taking the value.
-/
theorem foldr_subtype {p : α → Prop} {l : Array { x // p x }}
{f : { x // p x } → β → β} {g : α → β → β} {x : β}
{hf : ∀ x h b, f ⟨x, h⟩ b = g x b} :
l.foldr f x = l.unattach.foldr g x := by
cases l
simp only [List.foldr_toArray', List.unattach_toArray]
rw [List.foldr_subtype]
simp [hf]
/-- Variant of `foldr_subtype` with side condition to check `stop = l.size`. -/
@[simp] theorem foldr_subtype' {p : α → Prop} {l : Array { x // p x }}
{f : { x // p x } → β → β} {g : α → β → β} {x : β}
{hf : ∀ x h b, f ⟨x, h⟩ b = g x b} (h : start = l.size) :
l.foldr f x start 0 = l.unattach.foldr g x := by
subst h
rwa [foldr_subtype]
/--
This lemma identifies maps over arrays of subtypes, where the function only depends on the value, not the proposition,
and simplifies these to the function directly taking the value.
-/
@[simp] theorem map_subtype {p : α → Prop} {l : Array { x // p x }}
{f : { x // p x } → β} {g : α → β} {hf : ∀ x h, f ⟨x, h⟩ = g x} :
l.map f = l.unattach.map g := by
cases l
simp only [List.map_toArray, List.unattach_toArray]
rw [List.map_subtype]
simp [hf]
@[simp] theorem filterMap_subtype {p : α → Prop} {l : Array { x // p x }}
{f : { x // p x } → Option β} {g : α → Option β} {hf : ∀ x h, f ⟨x, h⟩ = g x} :
l.filterMap f = l.unattach.filterMap g := by
cases l
simp only [size_toArray, List.filterMap_toArray', List.unattach_toArray, List.length_unattach,
mk.injEq]
rw [List.filterMap_subtype]
simp [hf]
@[simp] theorem unattach_filter {p : α → Prop} {l : Array { x // p x }}
{f : { x // p x } → Bool} {g : α → Bool} {hf : ∀ x h, f ⟨x, h⟩ = g x} :
(l.filter f).unattach = l.unattach.filter g := by
cases l
simp [hf]
/-! ### Simp lemmas pushing `unattach` inwards. -/
@[simp] theorem unattach_reverse {p : α → Prop} {l : Array { x // p x }} :
l.reverse.unattach = l.unattach.reverse := by
cases l
simp
@[simp] theorem unattach_append {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : Array { x // p x }} :
(l₁ ++ l₂).unattach = l₁.unattach ++ l₂.unattach := by
cases l₁
cases l₂
simp
end Array