lean4-htt/tests/lean/439.lean.expected.out
Kyle Miller 1f4dea8582
feat: add pp.fieldNotation.generalized for generalized field notation, add @[pp_nodot] attribute (#3737)
Refactors app delaborator, merging in the projection delaborator, to
support pretty printing with generalized field notation.

Renames option `pp.structureProjections` to `pp.fieldNotation` and adds
sub-option `pp.fieldNotation.generalized` to enable/disable generalized
field notation. Adds `@[pp_nodot]` attribute to permanently disable
using field notation for a given declaration.

For now, the default value of `pp.fieldNotation.generalized` is false
since we need a stage0 update to add `@[pp_nodot]` to some core
definitions (such as `List.toArray`) before updating the tests.

[Zulip
discussion](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/270676-lean4/topic/.60pp.2EgeneralizedFieldNotation.60/near/425856054)
2024-03-22 08:55:02 +00:00

20 lines
488 B
Text

@Fn.imp ((p : P) → Bar.fn p) ({p : P} → Bar.fn p) fn : {p : P} → Bar.fn p
439.lean:18:7-18:12: error: function expected at
fn.imp
term has type
Bar.fn ?m
439.lean:29:7-29:11: error: function expected at
fn.imp
term has type
Bar.fn ?m
fn.imp : Bar.fn p
fn'.imp Bp : Bar.fn p
439.lean:39:11-39:12: error: application type mismatch
fn'.imp p
argument
p
has type
P : Sort u
but is expected to have type
Bar.fn ?m : Sort ?u
fn'.imp (sorryAx (Bar.fn ?m) true) : Bar.fn ?m