The proof of the instWPMonad instance relies on the equality of any two
terms of type `IO.RealWorld`, which is only a side effect of the current
transparent definition. Ignoring the questions around the utility of
proving things about programs in `IO`, the semantic validity of this
instance in the intended model of the IO monad is also unclear.
I tried a few things to axiomatize this instance so it could be put into
the test file to preserve the one test section that relies on it, but I
was unsuccessful; everything I attempted caused errors.
6a8d7cc17c