the support for mutual structural recursion (new since #4575) is extended so that Lean tries to infer it even without annotations. * The error message when termination checking fails looks quite different now. Maybe a bit better, maybe with more room for improvements. * If there are too many combinations (with an arbitrary cut-off) for a given argument type, it will just give up and ask the user to use `termination_by structural`. * It is now legal to specify `termination_by structural` on not necessarily all functions of a clique; this simply restricts the combinations of arguments that Lean considers. --------- Co-authored-by: Tobias Grosser <tobias@grosser.es>
42 lines
1.1 KiB
Text
42 lines
1.1 KiB
Text
terminationFailure.lean:7:2-7:3: error: fail to show termination for
|
|
f.g
|
|
f
|
|
with errors
|
|
failed to infer structural recursion:
|
|
Cannot use parameters #1 of f.g and x of f:
|
|
failed to eliminate recursive application
|
|
_root_.f x
|
|
|
|
|
|
Could not find a decreasing measure.
|
|
The arguments relate at each recursive call as follows:
|
|
(<, ≤, =: relation proved, ? all proofs failed, _: no proof attempted)
|
|
Call from f.g to f at 9:9-12:
|
|
x1
|
|
x =
|
|
Call from f to f.g at 3:4-7:
|
|
x
|
|
x1 =
|
|
|
|
Please use `termination_by` to specify a decreasing measure.
|
|
f (x : Nat) : Nat
|
|
f.g : Nat → Nat
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
|
terminationFailure.lean:20:4-20:5: error: fail to show termination for
|
|
h
|
|
with errors
|
|
failed to infer structural recursion:
|
|
Cannot use parameter x:
|
|
failed to eliminate recursive application
|
|
h x
|
|
|
|
|
|
failed to prove termination, possible solutions:
|
|
- Use `have`-expressions to prove the remaining goals
|
|
- Use `termination_by` to specify a different well-founded relation
|
|
- Use `decreasing_by` to specify your own tactic for discharging this kind of goal
|
|
x : Nat
|
|
⊢ False
|
|
h (x : Nat) : Foo
|
|
Foo.a
|