lean4-htt/old_library/init/meta/tactic.lean
2016-09-21 11:43:28 -07:00

639 lines
24 KiB
Text
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.trace init.function init.option init.monad init.alternative init.nat_div
import init.meta.exceptional init.meta.format init.meta.environment init.meta.pexpr
meta_constant tactic_state : Type
namespace tactic_state
meta_constant env : tactic_state → environment
meta_constant to_format : tactic_state → format
/- Format expression with respect to the main goal in the tactic state.
If the tactic state does not contain any goals, then format expression
using an empty local context. -/
meta_constant format_expr : tactic_state → expr → format
meta_constant get_options : tactic_state → options
meta_constant set_options : tactic_state → options → tactic_state
end tactic_state
attribute [instance]
meta_definition tactic_state.has_to_format : has_to_format tactic_state :=
has_to_format.mk tactic_state.to_format
inductive tactic_result (A : Type)
| success : A → tactic_state → tactic_result
| exception : (unit → format) → tactic_state → tactic_result
open tactic_result
section
variables {A : Type}
variables [has_to_string A]
meta_definition tactic_result_to_string : tactic_result A → string
| (success a s) := to_string a
| (exception .A e s) := "Exception: " ++ to_string (e ())
attribute [instance]
meta_definition tactic_result_has_to_string : has_to_string (tactic_result A) :=
has_to_string.mk tactic_result_to_string
end
attribute [reducible]
meta_definition tactic (A : Type) :=
tactic_state → tactic_result A
section
variables {A B : Type}
attribute [inline]
meta_definition tactic_fmap (f : A → B) (t : tactic A) : tactic B :=
λ s, tactic_result.cases_on (t s)
(λ a s', success (f a) s')
(λ e s', exception B e s')
attribute [inline]
meta_definition tactic_bind (t₁ : tactic A) (t₂ : A → tactic B) : tactic B :=
λ s, tactic_result.cases_on (t₁ s)
(λ a s', t₂ a s')
(λ e s', exception B e s')
attribute [inline]
meta_definition tactic_return (a : A) : tactic A :=
λ s, success a s
meta_definition tactic_orelse {A : Type} (t₁ t₂ : tactic A) : tactic A :=
λ s, tactic_result.cases_on (t₁ s)
success
(λ e₁ s', tactic_result.cases_on (t₂ s)
success
(exception A))
end
attribute [instance]
meta_definition tactic_is_monad : monad tactic :=
monad.mk @tactic_fmap @tactic_return @tactic_bind
meta_definition tactic.fail {A B : Type} [has_to_format B] (msg : B) : tactic A :=
λ s, exception A (λ u, to_fmt msg) s
meta_definition tactic.failed {A : Type} : tactic A :=
tactic.fail "failed"
attribute [instance]
meta_definition tactic_is_alternative : alternative tactic :=
alternative.mk @tactic_fmap (λ A a s, success a s) (@fapp _ _) @tactic.failed @tactic_orelse
namespace tactic
variables {A : Type}
meta_definition try (t : tactic A) : tactic unit :=
λ s, tactic_result.cases_on (t s)
(λ a, success ())
(λ e s', success () s)
meta_definition skip : tactic unit :=
success ()
open list
meta_definition foreach : list A → (A → tactic unit) → tactic unit
| [] fn := skip
| (e::es) fn := do fn e, foreach es fn
open nat
/- (repeat_at_most n t): repeat the given tactic at most n times or until t fails -/
meta_definition repeat_at_most : nat → tactic unit → tactic unit
| 0 t := skip
| (succ n) t := (do t, repeat_at_most n t) <|> skip
/- (repeat_exactly n t) : execute t n times -/
meta_definition repeat_exactly : nat → tactic unit → tactic unit
| 0 t := skip
| (succ n) t := do t, repeat_exactly n t
meta_definition repeat : tactic unit → tactic unit :=
repeat_at_most 100000
meta_definition returnex (e : exceptional A) : tactic A :=
λ s, match e with
| (exceptional.success a) := tactic_result.success a s
| (exceptional.exception .A f) := tactic_result.exception A (λ u, f options.mk) s -- TODO(Leo): extract options from environment
end
meta_definition returnopt (e : option A) : tactic A :=
λ s, match e with
| (some a) := tactic_result.success a s
| none := tactic_result.exception A (λ u, to_fmt "failed") s
end
/- Decorate t's exceptions with msg -/
meta_definition decorate_ex (msg : format) (t : tactic A) : tactic A :=
λ s, tactic_result.cases_on (t s)
success
(λ e, exception A (λ u, msg ++ format.nest 2 (format.line ++ e u)))
attribute [inline]
meta_definition write (s' : tactic_state) : tactic unit :=
λ s, success () s'
attribute [inline]
meta_definition read : tactic tactic_state :=
λ s, success s s
end tactic
meta_definition tactic_format_expr (e : expr) : tactic format :=
do s ← tactic.read, return (tactic_state.format_expr s e)
structure [class] has_to_tactic_format (A : Type) :=
(to_tactic_format : A → tactic format)
attribute [instance]
meta_definition expr_has_to_tactic_format : has_to_tactic_format expr :=
has_to_tactic_format.mk tactic_format_expr
meta_definition tactic.pp {A : Type} [has_to_tactic_format A] : A → tactic format :=
has_to_tactic_format.to_tactic_format
open tactic format
meta_definition list_to_tactic_format_aux {A : Type} [has_to_tactic_format A] : bool → list A → tactic format
| b [] := return $ to_fmt ""
| b (x::xs) := do
f₁ ← pp x,
f₂ ← list_to_tactic_format_aux ff xs,
return $ (if b = ff then to_fmt "," ++ line else nil) ++ f₁ ++ f₂
meta_definition list_to_tactic_format {A : Type} [has_to_tactic_format A] : list A → tactic format
| [] := return $ to_fmt "[]"
| (x::xs) := do
f ← list_to_tactic_format_aux tt (x::xs),
return $ to_fmt "[" ++ group (nest 1 f) ++ to_fmt "]"
attribute [instance]
meta_definition list_has_to_tactic_format {A : Type} [has_to_tactic_format A] : has_to_tactic_format (list A) :=
has_to_tactic_format.mk list_to_tactic_format
attribute [instance]
meta_definition has_to_format_to_has_to_tactic_format (A : Type) [has_to_format A] : has_to_tactic_format A :=
has_to_tactic_format.mk ((λ x, return x) ∘ to_fmt)
namespace tactic
open tactic_state
meta_definition get_env : tactic environment :=
do s ← read,
return $ env s
meta_definition get_decl (n : name) : tactic declaration :=
do s ← read,
returnex $ environment.get (env s) n
meta_definition trace {A : Type} [has_to_tactic_format A] (a : A) : tactic unit :=
do fmt ← pp a,
return $ _root_.trace_fmt fmt (λ u, ())
meta_definition trace_state : tactic unit :=
do s ← read,
trace $ to_fmt s
inductive transparency
| all | semireducible | reducible | none
export transparency (reducible semireducible)
/- Return the partial term/proof constructed so far. Note that the resultant expression
may contain variables that are not declarate in the current main goal. -/
meta_constant result : tactic expr
/- Display the partial term/proof constructed so far. This tactic is *not* equivalent to
do { r ← result, s ← read, return (format_expr s r) } because this one will format the result with respect
to the current goal, and trace_result will do it with respect to the initial goal. -/
meta_constant format_result : tactic format
/- Return target type of the main goal. Fail if tactic_state does not have any goal left. -/
meta_constant target : tactic expr
meta_constant intro_core : name → tactic expr
meta_constant intron : nat → tactic unit
meta_constant rename : name → name → tactic unit
/- Clear the given local constant. The tactic fails if the given expression is not a local constant. -/
meta_constant clear : expr → tactic unit
meta_constant revert_lst : list expr → tactic nat
meta_constant whnf_core : transparency → expr → tactic expr
meta_constant eta_expand : expr → tactic expr
meta_constant unify_core : transparency → expr → expr → tactic unit
/- is_def_eq_core is similar to unify_core, but it treats metavariables as constants. -/
meta_constant is_def_eq_core : transparency → expr → expr → tactic unit
/- Infer the type of the given expression.
Remark: transparency does not affect type inference -/
meta_constant infer_type : expr → tactic expr
meta_constant get_local : name → tactic expr
/- Return the hypothesis in the main goal. Fail if tactic_state does not have any goal left. -/
meta_constant local_context : tactic (list expr)
meta_constant get_unused_name : name → option nat → tactic name
/- Helper tactic for creating simple applications where some arguments are inferred using
type inference.
Example, given
rel.{l_1 l_2} : Pi (A : Type.{l_1}) (B : A -> Type.{l_2}), (Pi x : A, B x) -> (Pi x : A, B x) -> , Prop
nat : Type 1
real : Type 1
vec.{l} : Pi (A : Type l) (n : nat), Type.{l1}
f g : Pi (n : nat), vec real n
then
mk_app_core semireducible "rel" [f, g]
returns the application
rel.{1 2} nat (fun n : nat, vec real n) f g -/
meta_constant mk_app_core : transparency → name → list expr → tactic expr
/- Similar to mk_app, but allows to specify which arguments are explicit/implicit.
Example, given
a b : nat
then
mk_mapp_core semireducible "ite" [some (a > b), none, none, some a, some b]
returns the application
@ite.{1} (a > b) (nat.decidable_gt a b) nat a b -/
meta_constant mk_mapp_core : transparency → name → list (option expr) → tactic expr
/- Given a local constant t, if t has type (lhs = rhs) apply susbstitution.
Otherwise, try to find a local constant that has type of the form (t = t') or (t' = t).
The tactic fails if the given expression is not a local constant. -/
meta_constant subst : expr → tactic unit
meta_constant exact : expr → tactic unit
/- Elaborate the given quoted expression with respect to the current main goal.
If the boolean argument is tt, then metavariables are tolerated and
become new goals. -/
meta_constant to_expr_core : bool → pexpr → tactic expr
/- Return true if the given expression is a type class. -/
meta_constant is_class : expr → tactic bool
/- Try to create an instance of the given type class. -/
meta_constant mk_instance : expr → tactic expr
/- Change the target of the main goal.
The input expression must be definitionally equal to the current target. -/
meta_constant change : expr → tactic unit
/- (assert H T), adds a new goal for T, and the hypothesis (H : T) in the current goal. -/
meta_constant assert : name → expr → tactic unit
/- (assertv H T P), adds the hypothesis (H : T) in the current goal if P has type T. -/
meta_constant assertv : name → expr → expr → tactic unit
/- (define H T), adds a new goal for T, and the hypothesis (H : T := ?M) in the current goal. -/
meta_constant define : name → expr → tactic unit
/- (definev H T P), adds the hypothesis (H : T := P) in the current goal if P has type T. -/
meta_constant definev : name → expr → expr → tactic unit
/- rotate goals to the left -/
meta_constant rotate_left : nat → tactic unit
meta_constant get_goals : tactic (list expr)
meta_constant set_goals : list expr → tactic unit
/- (apply_core t all insts e), apply the expression e to the main goal,
the unification is performed using the given transparency mode.
If all is tt, then all unassigned meta-variables are added as new goals.
If insts is tt, then use type class resolution to instantiate unassigned meta-variables. -/
meta_constant apply_core : transparency → bool → bool → expr → tactic unit
/- Create a fresh meta universe variable. -/
meta_constant mk_meta_univ : tactic level
/- Create a fresh meta-variable with the given type.
The scope of the new meta-variable is the local context of the main goal. -/
meta_constant mk_meta_var : expr → tactic expr
/- Return the value assigned to the given universe meta-variable.
Fail if argument is not an universe meta-variable or if it is not assigned. -/
meta_constant get_univ_assignment : level → tactic level
/- Return the value assigned to the given meta-variable.
Fail if argument is not a meta-variable or if it is not assigned. -/
meta_constant get_assignment : expr → tactic expr
meta_constant mk_fresh_name : tactic name
/- Return a hash code for expr that ignores inst_implicit arguments,
and proofs. -/
meta_constant abstract_hash : expr → tactic nat
/- Return the "weight" of the given expr while ignoring inst_implicit arguments,
and proofs. -/
meta_constant abstract_weight : expr → tactic nat
meta_constant abstract_eq : expr → expr → tactic bool
/- (induction_core m H rec ns) induction on H using recursor rec, names for the new hypotheses
are retrieved from ns. If ns does not have sufficient names, then use the internal binder names in the recursor. -/
meta_constant induction_core : transparency → expr → name → list name → tactic unit
/- (cases_core m H ns) apply cases_on recursor, names for the new hypotheses are retrieved from ns.
H must be a local constant -/
meta_constant cases_core : transparency → expr → list name → tactic unit
/- (generalize_core m e n) -/
meta_constant generalize_core : transparency → expr → name → tactic unit
/- instantiate assigned metavariables in the given expression -/
meta_constant instantiate_mvars : expr → tactic expr
/- Add the given declaration to the environment -/
meta_constant add_decl : declaration → tactic unit
/- (set_basic_attribute_core attr_name c_name prio) set attribute attr_name for constant c_name with the given priority.
If the priority is none, then use default -/
meta_constant set_basic_attribute_core : name → name → option nat → tactic unit
/- (unset_attribute attr_name c_name) -/
meta_constant unset_attribute : name → name → tactic unit
meta_definition set_basic_attribute : name → name → tactic unit :=
λ a n, set_basic_attribute_core a n none
open list nat
/- Add (H : T := pr) to the current goal -/
meta_definition note (n : name) (pr : expr) : tactic unit :=
do t ← infer_type pr,
definev n t pr
meta_definition whnf : expr → tactic expr :=
whnf_core semireducible
meta_definition whnf_target : tactic unit :=
target >>= whnf >>= change
meta_definition intro (n : name) : tactic expr :=
do t ← target,
if expr.is_pi t = tt expr.is_let t = tt then intro_core n
else whnf_target >> intro_core n
meta_definition intro1 : tactic expr :=
intro `_
/- Remark: the unit argument is a trick to allow us to write a recursive definition.
Lean3 only allows recursive functions when "equations" are used. -/
meta_definition intros_core : unit → tactic (list expr)
| u :=
do t ← target,
match t with
| (expr.pi n bi d b) := do H ← intro1, Hs ← intros_core u, return (H :: Hs)
| (expr.elet n t v b) := do H ← intro1, Hs ← intros_core u, return (H :: Hs)
| e := return []
end
meta_definition intros : tactic (list expr) :=
intros_core ()
meta_definition intro_lst : list name → tactic (list expr)
| [] := return []
| (n::ns) := do H ← intro n, Hs ← intro_lst ns, return (H :: Hs)
meta_definition mk_app : name → list expr → tactic expr :=
mk_app_core semireducible
meta_definition mk_mapp : name → list (option expr) → tactic expr :=
mk_mapp_core semireducible
meta_definition to_expr : pexpr → tactic expr :=
to_expr_core ff
meta_definition revert (l : expr) : tactic nat :=
revert_lst [l]
meta_definition clear_lst : list name → tactic unit
| [] := skip
| (n::ns) := do H ← get_local n, clear H, clear_lst ns
meta_definition unify : expr → expr → tactic unit :=
unify_core semireducible
meta_definition is_def_eq : expr → expr → tactic unit :=
is_def_eq_core semireducible
meta_definition match_not (e : expr) : tactic expr :=
match (expr.is_not e) with
| (some a) := return a
| none := fail "expression is not a negation"
end
meta_definition match_eq (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) :=
match (expr.is_eq e) with
| (some (lhs, rhs)) := return (lhs, rhs)
| none := fail "expression is not an equality"
end
meta_definition match_ne (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) :=
match (expr.is_ne e) with
| (some (lhs, rhs)) := return (lhs, rhs)
| none := fail "expression is not a disequality"
end
meta_definition match_heq (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr × expr × expr) :=
do match (expr.is_heq e) with
| (some (A, lhs, B, rhs)) := return (A, lhs, B, rhs)
| none := fail "expression is not a heterogeneous equality"
end
meta_definition match_refl_app (e : expr) : tactic (name × expr × expr) :=
do env ← get_env,
match (environment.is_refl_app env e) with
| (some (R, lhs, rhs)) := return (R, lhs, rhs)
| none := fail "expression is not an application of a reflexive relation"
end
meta_definition get_local_type (n : name) : tactic expr :=
get_local n >>= infer_type
meta_definition trace_result : tactic unit :=
format_result >>= trace
/- (find_same_type t es) tries to find in es an expression with type definitionally equal to t -/
meta_definition find_same_type : expr → list expr → tactic expr
| e [] := failed
| e (H :: Hs) :=
do t ← infer_type H,
(unify e t >> return H) <|> find_same_type e Hs
meta_definition assumption : tactic unit :=
do { ctx ← local_context,
t ← target,
H ← find_same_type t ctx,
exact H }
<|> fail "assumption tactic failed"
/- Swap first two goals, do nothing if tactic state does not have at least two goals. -/
meta_definition swap : tactic unit :=
do gs ← get_goals,
match gs with
| (g₁ :: g₂ :: rs) := set_goals (g₂ :: g₁ :: rs)
| e := skip
end
/- Return the number of goals that need to be solved -/
meta_definition num_goals : tactic nat :=
do gs ← get_goals,
return (length gs)
/- We have to provide the instance argument `[has_mod nat]` because
mod for nat was not defined yet -/
meta_definition rotate_right (n : nat) [has_mod nat] : tactic unit :=
do ng ← num_goals,
if ng = 0 then skip
else rotate_left (ng - n % ng)
meta_definition rotate : nat → tactic unit :=
rotate_left
/- first [t_1, ..., t_n] applies the first tactic that doesn't fail.
The tactic fails if all t_i's fail. -/
meta_definition first {A : Type} : list (tactic A) → tactic A
| [] := fail "first tactic failed, no more alternatives"
| (t::ts) := t <|> first ts
/- Applies the given tactic to the main goal and fails if it is not solved. -/
meta_definition solve1 (tac : tactic unit) : tactic unit :=
do gs ← get_goals,
match gs with
| [] := fail "focus tactic failed, there isn't any goal left to focus"
| (g::rs) :=
do set_goals [g],
tac,
gs' ← get_goals,
match gs' with
| [] := set_goals rs
| gs := fail "focus tactic failed, focused goal has not been solved"
end
end
/- solve [t_1, ... t_n] applies the first tactic that solves the main goal. -/
meta_definition solve (ts : list (tactic unit)) : tactic unit :=
first $ map solve1 ts
private meta_definition focus_aux : list (tactic unit) → list expr → list expr → tactic unit
| [] gs rs := set_goals $ gs ++ rs
| (t::ts) (g::gs) rs := do
set_goals [g], t, rs' ← get_goals,
focus_aux ts gs (rs ++ rs')
| (t::ts) [] rs := fail "focus tactic failed, insufficient number of goals"
/- focus [t_1, ..., t_n] applies t_i to the i-th goal. Fails if there are less tha n goals. -/
meta_definition focus (ts : list (tactic unit)) : tactic unit :=
do gs ← get_goals, focus_aux ts gs []
private meta_definition all_goals_core : tactic unit → list expr → list expr → tactic unit
| tac [] ac := set_goals ac
| tac (g :: gs) ac :=
do set_goals [g],
tac,
new_gs ← get_goals,
all_goals_core tac gs (ac ++ new_gs)
/- Apply the given tactic to all goals. -/
meta_definition all_goals (tac : tactic unit) : tactic unit :=
do gs ← get_goals,
all_goals_core tac gs []
/- LCF-style AND_THEN tactic. It applies tac1, and if succeed applies tac2 to each subgoal produced by tac1 -/
meta_definition seq (tac1 : tactic unit) (tac2 : tactic unit) : tactic unit :=
do g::gs ← get_goals | failed,
set_goals [g],
tac1, all_goals tac2,
gs' ← get_goals,
set_goals (gs' ++ gs)
attribute [instance]
meta_definition tactic_has_andthen : has_andthen (tactic unit) :=
has_andthen.mk seq
/- Applies tac if c holds -/
meta_definition when (c : Prop) [decidable c] (tac : tactic unit) : tactic unit :=
if c then tac else skip
meta_constant is_trace_enabled_for : name → bool
/- Execute tac only if option trace.n is set to true. -/
meta_definition when_tracing (n : name) (tac : tactic unit) : tactic unit :=
when (is_trace_enabled_for n = tt) tac
/- Fail if there are no remaining goals. -/
meta_definition fail_if_no_goals : tactic unit :=
do n ← num_goals,
when (n = 0) (fail "tactic failed, there are no goals to be solved")
/- Fail if there are unsolved goals. -/
meta_definition now : tactic unit :=
do n ← num_goals,
when (n ≠ 0) (fail "now tactic failed, there are unsolved goals")
meta_definition apply : expr → tactic unit :=
apply_core semireducible ff tt
meta_definition fapply : expr → tactic unit :=
apply_core semireducible tt tt
/- Try to solve the main goal using type class resolution. -/
meta_definition apply_instance : tactic unit :=
do tgt ← target,
b ← is_class tgt,
if b = tt then mk_instance tgt >>= exact
else fail "apply_instance tactic fail, target is not a type class"
/- Create a list of universe meta-variables of the given size. -/
meta_definition mk_num_meta_univs : nat → tactic (list level)
| 0 := return []
| (succ n) := do
l ← mk_meta_univ,
ls ← mk_num_meta_univs n,
return (l::ls)
/- Return (expr.const c [l_1, ..., l_n]) where l_i's are fresh universe meta-variables. -/
meta_definition mk_const (c : name) : tactic expr :=
do env ← get_env,
decl ← returnex (environment.get env c),
num ← return (length (declaration.univ_params decl)),
ls ← mk_num_meta_univs num,
return (expr.const c ls)
/- Create a fresh universe ?u, a metavariable (?T : Type.{?u}),
and return metavariable (?M : ?T).
This action can be used to create a meta-variable when
we don't know its type at creation time -/
meta_definition mk_mvar : tactic expr :=
do u ← mk_meta_univ,
t ← mk_meta_var (expr.sort u),
mk_meta_var t
private meta_definition get_pi_arity_aux : expr → tactic nat
| (expr.pi n bi d b) :=
do m ← mk_fresh_name,
l ← return (expr.local_const m n bi d),
new_b ← whnf (expr.instantiate_var b l),
r ← get_pi_arity_aux new_b,
return (r + 1)
| e := return 0
/- Compute the arity of the given (Pi-)type -/
meta_definition get_pi_arity (type : expr) : tactic nat :=
whnf type >>= get_pi_arity_aux
/- Compute the arity of the given function -/
meta_definition get_arity (fn : expr) : tactic nat :=
infer_type fn >>= get_pi_arity
meta_definition triv : tactic unit := mk_const `trivial >>= exact
meta_definition by_contradiction (H : name) : tactic expr :=
do tgt : expr ← target,
(match_not tgt >> return ())
<|>
(mk_mapp `decidable.by_contradiction [some tgt, none] >>= apply)
<|>
fail "tactic by_contradiction failed, target is not a negation nor a decidable proposition (remark: when 'local attribute classical.prop_decidable [instance]' is used all propositions are decidable)",
intro H
meta_definition cases (H : expr) : tactic unit :=
cases_core semireducible H []
meta_definition cases_using : expr → list name → tactic unit :=
cases_core semireducible
meta_definition generalize : expr → name → tactic unit :=
generalize_core semireducible
meta_definition generalizes : list expr → tactic unit
| [] := skip
| (e::es) := generalize e `x >> generalizes es
meta_definition refine (e : pexpr) : tactic unit :=
do tgt : expr ← target,
to_expr_core tt `((%%e : %%tgt)) >>= exact
meta_definition expr_of_nat : nat → tactic expr
| n :=
if n = 0 then to_expr `(0)
else if n = 1 then to_expr `(1)
else do
r : expr ← expr_of_nat (n / 2),
if n % 2 = 0 then to_expr `(bit0 %%r)
else to_expr `(bit1 %%r)
notation `command`:max := tactic unit
end tactic