66 lines
2.3 KiB
Text
66 lines
2.3 KiB
Text
open tactic expr
|
||
|
||
constant nat.add_assoc (a b c : nat) : (a + b) + c = a + (b + c)
|
||
|
||
meta definition is_op_app (op : expr) (e : expr) : option (expr × expr) :=
|
||
match e with
|
||
| (app (app fn a1) a2) := if op = fn then some (a1, a2) else none
|
||
| e := none
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
meta definition flat_with : expr → expr → expr → expr → tactic (expr × expr)
|
||
| op assoc e rhs :=
|
||
match (is_op_app op e) with
|
||
| (some (a1, a2)) := do
|
||
-- H₁ is a proof for a2 + rhs = rhs₁
|
||
(rhs₁, H₁) ← flat_with op assoc a2 rhs,
|
||
-- H₂ is a proof for a1 + rhs₁ = rhs₂
|
||
(new_app, H₂) ← flat_with op assoc a1 rhs₁,
|
||
-- We need to generate a proof that (a1 + a2) + rhs = a1 + (a2 + rhs)
|
||
-- H₃ is a proof for (a1 + a2) + rhs = a1 + (a2 + rhs)
|
||
H₃ : expr ← return (app (app (app assoc a1) a2) rhs),
|
||
-- H₃ is a proof for a1 + (a2 + rhs) = a1 + rhs1
|
||
H₄ : expr ← mk_app `congr_arg [app op a1, H₁],
|
||
H₅ ← mk_app `eq.trans [H₃, H₄],
|
||
H ← mk_app `eq.trans [H₅, H₂],
|
||
return (new_app, H)
|
||
| none := do
|
||
new_app ← return $ app (app op e) rhs,
|
||
H ← mk_app `eq.refl [new_app],
|
||
return (new_app, H)
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
meta definition flat : expr → expr → expr → tactic (expr × expr)
|
||
| op assoc e :=
|
||
match (is_op_app op e) with
|
||
| (some (a1, a2)) := do
|
||
-- H₁ is a proof that a2 = new_a2
|
||
(new_a2, H₁) ← flat op assoc a2,
|
||
-- H₂ is a proof that a1 + new_a2 = new_app
|
||
(new_app, H₂) ← flat_with op assoc a1 new_a2,
|
||
-- We need a proof that (a1 + a2) = new_app
|
||
-- H₃ is a proof for a1 + a2 = a1 + new_a2
|
||
H₃ : expr ← mk_app `congr_arg [app op a1, H₁],
|
||
H ← mk_app `eq.trans [H₃, H₂],
|
||
return (new_app, H)
|
||
| none :=
|
||
do pr ← mk_app `eq.refl [e],
|
||
return (e, pr)
|
||
end
|
||
|
||
local infix `+` := nat.add
|
||
set_option trace.app_builder true
|
||
set_option pp.all true
|
||
|
||
example (a b c d e f g : nat) : ((a + b) + c) + ((d + e) + (f + g)) = a + (b + (c + (d + (e + (f + g))))) :=
|
||
by do
|
||
assoc : expr ← mk_const $ `nat.add_assoc,
|
||
op : expr ← mk_const $ `nat.add,
|
||
tgt ← target,
|
||
match (is_eq tgt) with
|
||
| (some (lhs, rhs)) := do
|
||
r ← flat op assoc lhs,
|
||
trace (prod.snd r),
|
||
exact (prod.snd r)
|
||
| none := failed
|
||
end
|