lean4-htt/library/init/wf.lean
Leonardo de Moura a7d08d2f3d feat(kernel/inductive/inductive): dependent elimination for inductive predicates
In Lean4, we will not generate non dependent recursors for inductive
predicates. The main goal is to make the shape of the automatically
generated recursors more uniform. The non uniform representation is
leftover from Lean2. In Lean2, we wanted to support different kernels
with different features. For example: we could create proof relevant
kernels, no impredicative universe, etc.
Recall that, in a kernel with an impredicative Prop and no proof
irrelevance, inductive predicates without dependent elimination are
weaker that inductive predicates with dependent elimination.
When proof irrelevance is enabled, we can generate the dependent
recursor from the non dependent one. Actually, the module drec.cpp
generates the dependent recursor.
Now, we only support one kind of kernel, and it doesn't make sense
anymore to generate non dependent recursors for inductive predicates.
This would only produce an unnecessary asymmetry on the inductive
datatype module.

Remark: we had to create non dependent recursors to help the elaborator.
This can be avoid if we improve the elaborator. I will do that in the
new elaborator implemented in Lean.

Remark: equation lemmas are broken for definitions that pattern match on
nested inductive datatypes. The problem is the super messy
`prove_eq_rec_invertible_aux` function. This function will not be needed
after I finish the new inductive datatype support in the kernel.

cc @kha
2018-06-12 13:03:26 -07:00

344 lines
14 KiB
Text
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.data.nat.basic
universes u v
inductive acc {α : Sort u} (r : αα → Prop) : α → Prop
| intro (x : α) (h : ∀ y, r y x → acc y) : acc x
@[elab_as_eliminator, inline, reducible]
def {u1 u2} acc.ndrec {α : Sort u2} {r : αα → Prop} {C : α → Sort u1}
(m : Π (x : α) (h : ∀ (y : α), r y x → acc r y), (Π (y : α) (a : r y x), C y) → C x)
{a : α} (n : acc r a) : C a :=
@acc.rec α r (λ α _, C α) m a n
@[elab_as_eliminator, inline, reducible]
def {u1 u2} acc.ndrec_on {α : Sort u2} {r : αα → Prop} {C : α → Sort u1}
{a : α} (n : acc r a)
(m : Π (x : α) (h : ∀ (y : α), r y x → acc r y), (Π (y : α) (a : r y x), C y) → C x)
: C a :=
@acc.rec α r (λ α _, C α) m a n
namespace acc
variables {α : Sort u} {r : αα → Prop}
def inv {x y : α} (h₁ : acc r x) (h₂ : r y x) : acc r y :=
acc.rec_on h₁ (λ x₁ ac₁ ih h₂, ac₁ y h₂) h₂
end acc
inductive well_founded {α : Sort u} (r : αα → Prop) : Prop
| intro (h : ∀ a, acc r a) : well_founded
class has_well_founded (α : Sort u) : Type u :=
(r : αα → Prop) (wf : well_founded r)
namespace well_founded
def apply {α : Sort u} {r : αα → Prop} (wf : well_founded r) : ∀ a, acc r a :=
assume a, well_founded.rec_on wf (λ p, p) a
section
parameters {α : Sort u} {r : αα → Prop}
local infix `≺`:50 := r
parameter hwf : well_founded r
theorem recursion {C : α → Sort v} (a : α) (h : Π x, (Π y, y ≺ x → C y) → C x) : C a :=
acc.rec_on (apply hwf a) (λ x₁ ac₁ ih, h x₁ ih)
theorem induction {C : α → Prop} (a : α) (h : ∀ x, (∀ y, y ≺ x → C y) → C x) : C a :=
recursion a h
variable {C : α → Sort v}
variable F : Π x, (Π y, y ≺ x → C y) → C x
def fix_F (x : α) (a : acc r x) : C x :=
acc.rec_on a (λ x₁ ac₁ ih, F x₁ ih)
theorem fix_F_eq (x : α) (acx : acc r x) :
fix_F F x acx = F x (λ (y : α) (p : y ≺ x), fix_F F y (acc.inv acx p)) :=
acc.rec (λ x r ih, rfl) acx
end
variables {α : Sort u} {C : α → Sort v} {r : αα → Prop}
-- Well-founded fixpoint
def fix (hwf : well_founded r) (F : Π x, (Π y, r y x → C y) → C x) (x : α) : C x :=
fix_F F x (apply hwf x)
-- Well-founded fixpoint satisfies fixpoint equation
theorem fix_eq (hwf : well_founded r) (F : Π x, (Π y, r y x → C y) → C x) (x : α) :
fix hwf F x = F x (λ y h, fix hwf F y) :=
fix_F_eq F x (apply hwf x)
end well_founded
open well_founded
-- Empty relation is well-founded
def empty_wf {α : Sort u} : well_founded (@empty_relation α) :=
well_founded.intro (λ (a : α),
acc.intro a (λ (b : α) (lt : false), false.rec _ lt))
-- Subrelation of a well-founded relation is well-founded
namespace subrelation
section
parameters {α : Sort u} {r Q : αα → Prop}
parameters (h₁ : subrelation Q r)
parameters (h₂ : well_founded r)
def accessible {a : α} (ac : acc r a) : acc Q a :=
acc.rec_on ac (λ x ax ih,
acc.intro x (λ (y : α) (lt : Q y x), ih y (h₁ lt)))
def wf : well_founded Q :=
⟨λ a, accessible (apply h₂ a)⟩
end
end subrelation
-- The inverse image of a well-founded relation is well-founded
namespace inv_image
section
parameters {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {r : β → β → Prop}
parameters (f : α → β)
parameters (h : well_founded r)
private def acc_aux {b : β} (ac : acc r b) : ∀ (x : α), f x = b → acc (inv_image r f) x :=
acc.ndrec_on ac (λ x acx ih z e,
acc.intro z (λ y lt, eq.ndrec_on e (λ acx ih, ih (f y) lt y rfl) acx ih))
def accessible {a : α} (ac : acc r (f a)) : acc (inv_image r f) a :=
acc_aux ac a rfl
def wf : well_founded (inv_image r f) :=
⟨λ a, accessible (apply h (f a))⟩
end
end inv_image
-- The transitive closure of a well-founded relation is well-founded
namespace tc
section
parameters {α : Sort u} {r : αα → Prop}
local notation `r⁺` := tc r
def accessible {z : α} (ac : acc r z) : acc (tc r) z :=
acc.ndrec_on ac (λ x acx ih,
acc.intro x (λ y rel,
tc.ndrec_on rel
(λ a b rab acx ih, ih a rab)
(λ a b c rab rbc ih₁ ih₂ acx ih, acc.inv (ih₂ acx ih) rab)
acx ih))
def wf (h : well_founded r) : well_founded r⁺ :=
⟨λ a, accessible (apply h a)⟩
end
end tc
-- less-than is well-founded
def nat.lt_wf : well_founded nat.lt :=
⟨nat.rec
(acc.intro 0 (λ n h, absurd h (nat.not_lt_zero n)))
(λ n ih, acc.intro (nat.succ n) (λ m h,
or.elim (nat.eq_or_lt_of_le (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h))
(λ e, eq.substr e ih) (acc.inv ih)))⟩
def measure {α : Sort u} : (α) → αα → Prop :=
inv_image (<)
def measure_wf {α : Sort u} (f : α) : well_founded (measure f) :=
inv_image.wf f nat.lt_wf
def sizeof_measure (α : Sort u) [has_sizeof α] : αα → Prop :=
measure sizeof
def sizeof_measure_wf (α : Sort u) [has_sizeof α] : well_founded (sizeof_measure α) :=
measure_wf sizeof
instance has_well_founded_of_has_sizeof (α : Sort u) [has_sizeof α] : has_well_founded α :=
{r := sizeof_measure α, wf := sizeof_measure_wf α}
namespace prod
open well_founded
section
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
variable (ra : αα → Prop)
variable (rb : β → β → Prop)
-- Lexicographical order based on ra and rb
inductive lex : α × β → α × β → Prop
| left {a₁} (b₁) {a₂} (b₂) (h : ra a₁ a₂) : lex (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂)
| right (a) {b₁ b₂} (h : rb b₁ b₂) : lex (a, b₁) (a, b₂)
-- relational product based on ra and rb
inductive rprod : α × β → α × β → Prop
| intro {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂} (h₁ : ra a₁ a₂) (h₂ : rb b₁ b₂) : rprod (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂)
end
section
parameters {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
parameters {ra : αα → Prop} {rb : β → β → Prop}
local infix `≺`:50 := lex ra rb
def lex_accessible {a} (aca : acc ra a) (acb : ∀ b, acc rb b): ∀ b, acc (lex ra rb) (a, b) :=
acc.ndrec_on aca (λ xa aca iha b,
acc.ndrec_on (acb b) (λ xb acb ihb,
acc.intro (xa, xb) (λ p lt,
have aux : xa = xa → xb = xb → acc (lex ra rb) p, from
@prod.lex.rec_on α β ra rb (λ p₁ p₂ _, fst p₂ = xa → snd p₂ = xb → acc (lex ra rb) p₁)
p (xa, xb) lt
(λ a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ h (eq₂ : a₂ = xa) (eq₃ : b₂ = xb), iha a₁ (eq.rec_on eq₂ h) b₁)
(λ a b₁ b₂ h (eq₂ : a = xa) (eq₃ : b₂ = xb), eq.rec_on eq₂.symm (ihb b₁ (eq.rec_on eq₃ h))),
aux rfl rfl)))
-- The lexicographical order of well founded relations is well-founded
def lex_wf (ha : well_founded ra) (hb : well_founded rb) : well_founded (lex ra rb) :=
⟨λ p, cases_on p (λ a b, lex_accessible (apply ha a) (well_founded.apply hb) b)⟩
-- relational product is a subrelation of the lex
def rprod_sub_lex : ∀ a b, rprod ra rb a b → lex ra rb a b :=
@prod.rprod.rec _ _ ra rb (λ a b _, lex ra rb a b) (λ a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ h₁ h₂, lex.left rb b₁ b₂ h₁)
-- The relational product of well founded relations is well-founded
def rprod_wf (ha : well_founded ra) (hb : well_founded rb) : well_founded (rprod ra rb) :=
subrelation.wf (rprod_sub_lex) (lex_wf ha hb)
end
instance has_well_founded {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [s₁ : has_well_founded α] [s₂ : has_well_founded β] : has_well_founded (α × β) :=
{r := lex s₁.r s₂.r, wf := lex_wf s₁.wf s₂.wf}
end prod
namespace psigma
section
variables {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v}
variable (r : αα → Prop)
variable (s : ∀ a, β a → β a → Prop)
-- Lexicographical order based on r and s
inductive lex : psigma β → psigma β → Prop
| left : ∀ {a₁ : α} (b₁ : β a₁) {a₂ : α} (b₂ : β a₂), r a₁ a₂ → lex ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩
| right : ∀ (a : α) {b₁ b₂ : β a}, s a b₁ b₂ → lex ⟨a, b₁⟩ ⟨a, b₂⟩
end
section
parameters {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v}
parameters {r : αα → Prop} {s : Π a : α, β a → β a → Prop}
local infix `≺`:50 := lex r s
def lex_accessible {a} (aca : acc r a) (acb : ∀ a, well_founded (s a))
: ∀ (b : β a), acc (lex r s) ⟨a, b⟩ :=
acc.ndrec_on aca
(λ xa aca (iha : ∀ y, r y xa → ∀ b : β y, acc (lex r s) ⟨y, b⟩),
λ b : β xa, acc.ndrec_on (well_founded.apply (acb xa) b)
(λ xb acb
(ihb : ∀ (y : β xa), s xa y xb → acc (lex r s) ⟨xa, y⟩),
acc.intro ⟨xa, xb⟩ (λ p (lt : p ≺ ⟨xa, xb⟩),
have aux : xa = xa → xb == xb → acc (lex r s) p, from
@psigma.lex.rec_on α β r s (λ p₁ p₂ _, p₂.1 = xa → p₂.2 == xb → acc (lex r s) p₁)
p ⟨xa, xb⟩ lt
(λ (a₁ : α) (b₁ : β a₁) (a₂ : α) (b₂ : β a₂) (h : r a₁ a₂) (eq₂ : a₂ = xa) (eq₃ : b₂ == xb),
have aux : (∀ (y : α), r y xa → ∀ (b : β y), acc (lex r s) ⟨y, b⟩) →
r a₁ a₂ → ∀ (b₁ : β a₁), acc (lex r s) ⟨a₁, b₁⟩,
from eq.subst eq₂ (λ iha h b₁, iha a₁ h b₁),
aux iha h b₁)
(λ (a : α) (b₁ b₂ : β a) (h : s a b₁ b₂) (eq₂ : a = xa) (eq₃ : b₂ == xb),
have aux : ∀ (xb : β xa), (∀ (y : β xa), s xa y xb → acc (s xa) y) →
(∀ (y : β xa), s xa y xb → acc (lex r s) ⟨xa, y⟩) →
lex r s p ⟨xa, xb⟩ → ∀ (b₁ : β a), s a b₁ b₂ → b₂ == xb → acc (lex r s) ⟨a, b₁⟩,
from eq.subst eq₂ (λ xb acb ihb lt b₁ h eq₃,
have new_eq₃ : b₂ = xb, from eq_of_heq eq₃,
have aux : (∀ (y : β a), s a y xb → acc (lex r s) ⟨a, y⟩) →
∀ (b₁ : β a), s a b₁ b₂ → acc (lex r s) ⟨a, b₁⟩,
from eq.subst new_eq₃ (λ ihb b₁ h, ihb b₁ h),
aux ihb b₁ h),
aux xb acb ihb lt b₁ h eq₃),
aux rfl (heq.refl xb))))
-- The lexicographical order of well founded relations is well-founded
def lex_wf (ha : well_founded r) (hb : ∀ x, well_founded (s x)) : well_founded (lex r s) :=
well_founded.intro $ λ ⟨a, b⟩, lex_accessible (well_founded.apply ha a) hb b
end
section
parameters {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v}
def lex_ndep (r : αα → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) :=
lex r (λ a : α, s)
def lex_ndep_wf {r : αα → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} (ha : well_founded r) (hb : well_founded s)
: well_founded (lex_ndep r s) :=
well_founded.intro $ λ ⟨a, b⟩, lex_accessible (well_founded.apply ha a) (λ x, hb) b
end
section
variables {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v}
variable (r : αα → Prop)
variable (s : β → β → Prop)
-- Reverse lexicographical order based on r and s
inductive rev_lex : @psigma α (λ a, β) → @psigma α (λ a, β) → Prop
| left : ∀ {a₁ a₂ : α} (b : β), r a₁ a₂ → rev_lex ⟨a₁, b⟩ ⟨a₂, b⟩
| right : ∀ (a₁ : α) {b₁ : β} (a₂ : α) {b₂ : β}, s b₁ b₂ → rev_lex ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩
end
section
open well_founded
parameters {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v}
parameters {r : αα → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
local infix `≺`:50 := rev_lex r s
def rev_lex_accessible {b} (acb : acc s b) (aca : ∀ a, acc r a): ∀ a, acc (rev_lex r s) ⟨a, b⟩ :=
acc.rec_on acb
(λ xb acb (ihb : ∀ y, s y xb → ∀ a, acc (rev_lex r s) ⟨a, y⟩),
λ a, acc.rec_on (aca a)
(λ xa aca (iha : ∀ y, r y xa → acc (rev_lex r s) (mk y xb)),
acc.intro ⟨xa, xb⟩ (λ p (lt : p ≺ ⟨xa, xb⟩),
have aux : xa = xa → xb = xb → acc (rev_lex r s) p, from
@rev_lex.rec_on α β r s (λ p₁ p₂ _, fst p₂ = xa → snd p₂ = xb → acc (rev_lex r s) p₁)
p ⟨xa, xb⟩ lt
(λ a₁ a₂ b (h : r a₁ a₂) (eq₂ : a₂ = xa) (eq₃ : b = xb),
show acc (rev_lex r s) ⟨a₁, b⟩, from
have r₁ : r a₁ xa, from eq.rec_on eq₂ h,
have aux : acc (rev_lex r s) ⟨a₁, xb⟩, from iha a₁ r₁,
eq.rec_on (eq.symm eq₃) aux)
(λ a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ (h : s b₁ b₂) (eq₂ : a₂ = xa) (eq₃ : b₂ = xb),
show acc (rev_lex r s) (mk a₁ b₁), from
have s₁ : s b₁ xb, from eq.rec_on eq₃ h,
ihb b₁ s₁ a₁),
aux rfl rfl)))
def rev_lex_wf (ha : well_founded r) (hb : well_founded s) : well_founded (rev_lex r s) :=
well_founded.intro $ λ ⟨a, b⟩, rev_lex_accessible (apply hb b) (well_founded.apply ha) a
end
section
def skip_left (α : Type u) {β : Type v} (s : β → β → Prop) : @psigma α (λ a, β) → @psigma α (λ a, β) → Prop :=
rev_lex empty_relation s
def skip_left_wf (α : Type u) {β : Type v} {s : β → β → Prop} (hb : well_founded s) : well_founded (skip_left α s) :=
rev_lex_wf empty_wf hb
def mk_skip_left {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {b₁ b₂ : β} {s : β → β → Prop}
(a₁ a₂ : α) (h : s b₁ b₂) : skip_left α s ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩ :=
rev_lex.right _ _ _ h
end
instance has_well_founded {α : Type u} {β : α → Type v} [s₁ : has_well_founded α] [s₂ : ∀ a, has_well_founded (β a)] : has_well_founded (psigma β) :=
{r := lex s₁.r (λ a, (s₂ a).r), wf := lex_wf s₁.wf (λ a, (s₂ a).wf)}
end psigma
/- Temporary hack for bootstrapping lean.
TODO: DELETE!!!!
This axiom is inconsistent. We can use it to prove that any function terminates.
We are temporarily using this axiom until the new code generator is ready.
With the new code generator, we will pre-compile into C/C++ a default
tactic for proving termination. This tactic is then used to define the Lean compiler.
-/
axiom wf_term_hack {α : Type u} [has_well_founded α] (x y : α) : has_well_founded.r x y