lean4-htt/tests/lean/run/funind_structural.lean
Joachim Breitner ab318dda2d
feat: use reserved name infrastructure for functional induction (#3776)
no need to enter `derive_functional_induction` anymore.

(Will remove the support for `derive_functional_induction` after the
next stage0 update, since we are already using it in Init.)
2024-03-26 22:25:10 +00:00

199 lines
7.3 KiB
Text
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

import Lean.Elab.Command
import Lean.Elab.PreDefinition.Structural.Eqns
/-!
This module tests functional induction principles on *structurally* recursive functions.
-/
def fib : Nat → Nat
| 0 | 1 => 0
| n+2 => fib n + fib (n+1)
/--
info: fib.induct (motive : Nat → Prop) (case1 : motive 0) (case2 : motive 1)
(case3 : ∀ (n : Nat), motive n → motive (n + 1) → motive n.succ.succ) : ∀ (a : Nat), motive a
-/
#guard_msgs in
#check fib.induct
def binary : Nat → Nat → Nat
| 0, acc | 1, acc => 1 + acc
| n+2, acc => binary n (binary (n+1) acc)
/--
info: binary.induct (motive : Nat → Nat → Prop) (case1 : ∀ (acc : Nat), motive 0 acc) (case2 : ∀ (acc : Nat), motive 1 acc)
(case3 : ∀ (n acc : Nat), motive (n + 1) acc → motive n (binary (n + 1) acc) → motive n.succ.succ acc) :
∀ (a a_1 : Nat), motive a a_1
-/
#guard_msgs in
#check binary.induct
-- Different parameter order
def binary' : Bool → Nat → Bool
| acc, 0 | acc , 1 => not acc
| acc, n+2 => binary' (binary' acc (n+1)) n
/--
info: binary'.induct (motive : Bool → Nat → Prop) (case1 : ∀ (acc : Bool), motive acc 0)
(case2 : ∀ (acc : Bool), motive acc 1)
(case3 : ∀ (acc : Bool) (n : Nat), motive acc (n + 1) → motive (binary' acc (n + 1)) n → motive acc n.succ.succ) :
∀ (a : Bool) (a_1 : Nat), motive a a_1
-/
#guard_msgs in
#check binary'.induct
def zip {α β} : List α → List β → List (α × β)
| [], _ => []
| _, [] => []
| x::xs, y::ys => (x, y) :: zip xs ys
/--
info: zip.induct.{u_1, u_2} {α : Type u_1} {β : Type u_2} (motive : List α → List β → Prop)
(case1 : ∀ (x : List β), motive [] x) (case2 : ∀ (x : List α), (x = [] → False) → motive x [])
(case3 : ∀ (x : α) (xs : List α) (y : β) (ys : List β), motive xs ys → motive (x :: xs) (y :: ys)) :
∀ (a : List α) (a_1 : List β), motive a a_1
-/
#guard_msgs in
#check zip.induct
/-- Lets try ot use it! -/
theorem zip_length {α β} (xs : List α) (ys : List β) :
(zip xs ys).length = xs.length.min ys.length := by
induction xs, ys using zip.induct
case case1 => simp [zip]
case case2 => simp [zip]
case case3 =>
simp [zip, *]
simp [Nat.min_def]
split<;>split<;> omega
theorem zip_get? {α β} (as : List α) (bs : List β) :
(List.zip as bs).get? i = match as.get? i, bs.get? i with
| some a, some b => some (a, b) | _, _ => none := by
induction as, bs using zip.induct generalizing i
<;> cases i <;> simp_all
-- Testing recursion on an indexed data type
inductive Finn : Nat → Type where
| fzero : {n : Nat} → Finn n
| fsucc : {n : Nat} → Finn n → Finn (n+1)
def Finn.min (x : Bool) {n : Nat} (m : Nat) : Finn n → (f : Finn n) → Finn n
| fzero, _ => fzero
| _, fzero => fzero
| fsucc i, fsucc j => fsucc (Finn.min (not x) (m + 1) i j)
/--
info: Finn.min.induct (motive : Bool → {n : Nat} → Nat → Finn n → Finn n → Prop)
(case1 : ∀ (x : Bool) (m n : Nat) (x_1 : Finn n), motive x m Finn.fzero x_1)
(case2 : ∀ (x : Bool) (m n : Nat) (x_1 : Finn n), (x_1 = Finn.fzero → False) → motive x m x_1 Finn.fzero)
(case3 : ∀ (x : Bool) (m n : Nat) (i j : Finn n), motive (!x) (m + 1) i j → motive x m i.fsucc j.fsucc) (x : Bool)
{n : Nat} (m : Nat) : ∀ (a f : Finn n), motive x m a f
-/
#guard_msgs in
#check Finn.min.induct
namespace TreeExample
inductive Tree (β : Type v) where
| leaf
| node (left : Tree β) (key : Nat) (value : β) (right : Tree β)
def Tree.insert (t : Tree β) (k : Nat) (v : β) : Tree β :=
match t with
| leaf => node leaf k v leaf
| node left key value right =>
if k < key then
node (left.insert k v) key value right
else if key < k then
node left key value (right.insert k v)
else
node left k v right
/--
info: TreeExample.Tree.insert.induct.{u_1} {β : Type u_1} (motive : Tree β → Nat → β → Prop)
(case1 : ∀ (k : Nat) (v : β), motive Tree.leaf k v)
(case2 :
∀ (k : Nat) (v : β) (left : Tree β) (key : Nat) (value : β) (right : Tree β),
k < key → motive left k v → motive (left.node key value right) k v)
(case3 :
∀ (k : Nat) (v : β) (left : Tree β) (key : Nat) (value : β) (right : Tree β),
¬k < key → key < k → motive right k v → motive (left.node key value right) k v)
(case4 :
∀ (k : Nat) (v : β) (left : Tree β) (key : Nat) (value : β) (right : Tree β),
¬k < key → ¬key < k → motive (left.node key value right) k v)
(t : Tree β) (k : Nat) (v : β) : motive t k v
-/
#guard_msgs in
#check TreeExample.Tree.insert.induct
end TreeExample
namespace TermDenote
inductive HList {α : Type v} (β : α → Type u) : List α → Type (max u v)
| nil : HList β []
| cons : β i → HList β is → HList β (i::is)
inductive Member : α → List α → Type
| head : Member a (a::as)
| tail : Member a bs → Member a (b::bs)
def HList.get : HList β is → Member i is → β i
| .cons a as, .head => a
| .cons _ as, .tail h => as.get h
inductive Ty where
| nat
| fn : Ty → Ty → Ty
@[reducible] def Ty.denote : Ty → Type
| nat => Nat
| fn a b => a.denote → b.denote
inductive Term : List Ty → Ty → Type
| var : Member ty ctx → Term ctx ty
| const : Nat → Term ctx .nat
| plus : Term ctx .nat → Term ctx .nat → Term ctx .nat
| app : Term ctx (.fn dom ran) → Term ctx dom → Term ctx ran
| lam : Term (.cons dom ctx) ran → Term ctx (.fn dom ran)
| let : Term ctx ty₁ → Term (.cons ty₁ ctx) ty₂ → Term ctx ty₂
def Term.denote : Term ctx ty → HList Ty.denote ctx → ty.denote
| .var h, env => env.get h
| .const n, _ => n
| .plus a b, env => a.denote env + b.denote env
-- the following recursive call is interesting: Here the `ty.denote` for `f`'s type
-- becomes a function, and thus the recursive call takes an extra argument
-- But in the induction principle, we have `motive f` here, which does not
-- take an extra argument, so we have to be careful to not pass too many arguments to it
| .app f a, env => f.denote env (a.denote env)
| .lam b, env => fun x => b.denote (.cons x env)
| .let a b, env => b.denote (.cons (a.denote env) env)
/--
info: TermDenote.Term.denote.induct (motive : {ctx : List Ty} → {ty : Ty} → Term ctx ty → HList Ty.denote ctx → Prop)
(case1 : ∀ (a : List Ty) (ty : Ty) (h : Member ty a) (env : HList Ty.denote a), motive (Term.var h) env)
(case2 : ∀ (a : List Ty) (n : Nat) (x : HList Ty.denote a), motive (Term.const n) x)
(case3 :
∀ (a : List Ty) (a_1 b : Term a Ty.nat) (env : HList Ty.denote a),
motive a_1 env → motive b env → motive (a_1.plus b) env)
(case4 :
∀ (a : List Ty) (ty dom : Ty) (f : Term a (dom.fn ty)) (a_1 : Term a dom) (env : HList Ty.denote a),
motive a_1 env → motive f env → motive (f.app a_1) env)
(case5 :
∀ (a : List Ty) (dom ran : Ty) (b : Term (dom :: a) ran) (env : HList Ty.denote a),
(∀ (x : dom.denote), motive b (HList.cons x env)) → motive b.lam env)
(case6 :
∀ (a : List Ty) (ty ty₁ : Ty) (a_1 : Term a ty₁) (b : Term (ty₁ :: a) ty) (env : HList Ty.denote a),
motive a_1 env → motive b (HList.cons (a_1.denote env) env) → motive (a_1.let b) env)
{ctx : List Ty} {ty : Ty} : ∀ (a : Term ctx ty) (a_1 : HList Ty.denote ctx), motive a a_1
-/
#guard_msgs in
#check TermDenote.Term.denote.induct
end TermDenote