lean4-htt/tests/lean/run/ac_expr.lean
2021-02-17 13:03:24 -08:00

173 lines
5.8 KiB
Text
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

import Std
inductive Expr where
| var (i : Nat)
| op (lhs rhs : Expr)
deriving Inhabited, Repr
def List.getIdx : List α → Nat → αα
| [], i, u => u
| a::as, 0, u => a
| a::as, i+1, u => getIdx as i u
structure Context (α : Type u) where
op : ααα
unit : α
assoc : (a b c : α) → op (op a b) c = op a (op b c)
comm : (a b : α) → op a b = op b a
vars : List α
theorem Context.left_comm (ctx : Context α) (a b c : α) : ctx.op a (ctx.op b c) = ctx.op b (ctx.op a c) := by
rw [← ctx.assoc, ctx.comm a b, ctx.assoc]
def Expr.denote (ctx : Context α) : Expr → α
| Expr.op a b => ctx.op (denote ctx a) (denote ctx b)
| Expr.var i => ctx.vars.getIdx i ctx.unit
theorem Expr.denote_op (ctx : Context α) (a b : Expr) : denote ctx (Expr.op a b) = ctx.op (denote ctx a) (denote ctx b) :=
rfl
theorem Expr.denote_var (ctx : Context α) (i : Nat) : denote ctx (Expr.var i) = ctx.vars.getIdx i ctx.unit :=
rfl
def Expr.concat : Expr → Expr → Expr
| Expr.op a b, c => Expr.op a (concat b c)
| Expr.var i, c => Expr.op (Expr.var i) c
theorem Expr.concat_op (a b c : Expr) : concat (Expr.op a b) c = Expr.op a (concat b c) :=
rfl
theorem Expr.concat_var (i : Nat) (c : Expr) : concat (Expr.var i) c = Expr.op (Expr.var i) c :=
rfl
theorem Expr.denote_concat (ctx : Context α) (a b : Expr) : denote ctx (concat a b) = denote ctx (Expr.op a b) := by
induction a with
| Expr.var i => rfl
| Expr.op _ _ _ ih => rw [concat_op, denote_op, ih, denote_op, denote_op, denote_op, ctx.assoc]
def Expr.flat : Expr → Expr
| Expr.op a b => concat (flat a) (flat b)
| Expr.var i => Expr.var i
theorem Expr.flat_op (a b : Expr) : flat (Expr.op a b) = concat (flat a) (flat b) :=
rfl
theorem Expr.denote_flat (ctx : Context α) (a : Expr) : denote ctx (flat a) = denote ctx a := by
induction a with
| Expr.var i => rfl
| Expr.op a b ih₁ ih₂ => rw [flat_op, denote_concat, denote_op, denote_op, ih₁, ih₂]
theorem Expr.eq_of_flat (ctx : Context α) (a b : Expr) (h : flat a = flat b) : denote ctx a = denote ctx b := by
rw [← Expr.denote_flat _ a, ← Expr.denote_flat _ b, h]
theorem ex₁ (x₁ x₂ x₃ x₄ : Nat) : (x₁ + x₂) + (x₃ + x₄) = x₁ + x₂ + x₃ + x₄ :=
Expr.eq_of_flat
{ op := Nat.add
assoc := Nat.add_assoc
comm := Nat.add_comm
unit := Nat.zero
vars := [x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄] }
(Expr.op (Expr.op (Expr.var 0) (Expr.var 1)) (Expr.op (Expr.var 2) (Expr.var 3)))
(Expr.op (Expr.op (Expr.op (Expr.var 0) (Expr.var 1)) (Expr.var 2)) (Expr.var 3))
rfl
def Expr.length : Expr → Nat
| op a b => 1 + b.length
| _ => 1
def Expr.sort (e : Expr) : Expr :=
loop e.length e
where
loop : Nat → Expr → Expr
| fuel+1, Expr.op a e =>
let (e₁, e₂) := swap a e
Expr.op e₁ (loop fuel e₂)
| _, e => e
swap : Expr → Expr → Expr × Expr
| Expr.var i, Expr.op (Expr.var j) e =>
if i > j then
let (e₁, e₂) := swap (Expr.var j) e
(e₁, Expr.op (Expr.var i) e₂)
else
let (e₁, e₂) := swap (Expr.var i) e
(e₁, Expr.op (Expr.var j) e₂)
| Expr.var i, Expr.var j =>
if i > j then
(Expr.var j, Expr.var i)
else
(Expr.var i, Expr.var j)
| e₁, e₂ => (e₁, e₂)
def mkExpr : List Nat → Expr
| [] => Expr.var 0
| [i] => Expr.var i
| i::is => Expr.op (Expr.var i) (mkExpr is)
theorem Expr.denote_sort (ctx : Context α) (e : Expr) : denote ctx (sort e) = denote ctx e := by
apply denote_loop
where
denote_loop (n : Nat) (e : Expr) : denote ctx (sort.loop n e) = denote ctx e := by
induction n generalizing e with
| zero => rfl
| succ n ih =>
match e with
| var _ => rfl
| op a b =>
simp [denote, sort.loop]
match h:sort.swap a b with
| (r₁, r₂) =>
have hs := denote_swap a b
rw [h] at hs
simp [denote] at hs
simp [denote, ih]
assumption
denote_swap (e₁ e₂ : Expr) : denote ctx (Expr.op (sort.swap e₁ e₂).1 (sort.swap e₁ e₂).2) = denote ctx (Expr.op e₁ e₂) := by
induction e₂ generalizing e₁ with
| op a b ih' ih =>
clear ih'
cases e₁ with
| var i =>
cases a with
| var j =>
byCases h : i > j
focus
simp [sort.swap, h]
have ih := ih (var j)
match h:sort.swap (var j) b with
| (r₁, r₂) => simp; rw [denote_op ctx (var i), ← ih]; simp [h, denote]; rw [Context.left_comm]
focus
simp [sort.swap, h]
have ih' := ih (var i)
match h:sort.swap (var i) b with
| (r₁, r₂) =>
simp
rw [denote_op _ (var i), denote_op _ (var j), Context.left_comm, ← denote_op _ (var i), ← ih]
simp [h, denote]
rw [Context.left_comm]
| _ => rfl
| _ => rfl
| var j =>
cases e₁ with
| var i =>
byCases h : i > j
{ simp [sort.swap, h, denote, Context.comm] }
{ simp [sort.swap, h] }
| _ => rfl
theorem Expr.eq_of_sort_flat (ctx : Context α) (a b : Expr) (h : sort (flat a) = sort (flat b)) : denote ctx a = denote ctx b := by
rw [← Expr.denote_flat _ a, ← Expr.denote_flat _ b, ← Expr.denote_sort _ (flat a), ← Expr.denote_sort _ (flat b), h]
theorem ex₂ (x₁ x₂ x₃ x₄ : Nat) : (x₁ + x₂) + (x₃ + x₄) = x₃ + x₁ + x₂ + x₄ :=
Expr.eq_of_sort_flat
{ op := Nat.add
assoc := Nat.add_assoc
comm := Nat.add_comm
unit := Nat.zero
vars := [x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄] }
(Expr.op (Expr.op (Expr.var 0) (Expr.var 1)) (Expr.op (Expr.var 2) (Expr.var 3)))
(Expr.op (Expr.op (Expr.op (Expr.var 2) (Expr.var 0)) (Expr.var 1)) (Expr.var 3))
rfl
#print ex₂