lean4-htt/tests/lean/run/2161.lean
Kyle Miller ce73bbe277
feat: detailed feedback on decide tactic failure (#4674)
When the `decide` tactic fails, it can try to give hints about the
failure:
- It tells you which `Decidable` instances it unfolded, by making use of
the diagnostics feature.
- If it encounters `Eq.rec`, it gives you a hint that one of these
instances was likely defined using tactics.
- If it encounters `Classical.choice`, it hints that you might have
classical instances in scope.
- During this, it tries to process `Decidable.rec`s and matchers to pin
blame on a particular instance that failed to reduce.

This idea comes from discussion with Heather Macbeth [on
Zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/270676-lean4/topic/Decidable.20with.20structures/near/449409870).
2024-07-11 20:08:29 +00:00

50 lines
1.5 KiB
Text

structure Foo where num : Nat deriving DecidableEq
namespace Foo
instance : OfNat Foo n := ⟨⟨n⟩⟩
/-! # Example 1 -/
@[irreducible] def mul (a b : Foo) : Foo :=
let d := Nat.gcd a.num 1
⟨(a.num.div d) * (b.num.div d)⟩
-- should fail fast; exact heartbeat count at time of writing is 31
set_option maxHeartbeats 310
/--
error: tactic 'decide' failed for proposition
((mul 4 1).mul 1).mul 1 = 4
since its 'Decidable' instance
instDecidableEqFoo (((mul 4 1).mul 1).mul 1) 4
did not reduce to 'isTrue' or 'isFalse'.
After unfolding the instances 'decEqFoo✝', 'instDecidableEqFoo', 'instDecidableEqNat' and
'Nat.decEq', reduction got stuck at the 'Decidable' instance
match h : (((mul 4 1).mul 1).mul 1).num.beq 4 with
| true => isTrue ⋯
| false => isFalse ⋯
-/
#guard_msgs in
example : ((Foo.mul 4 1).mul 1).mul 1 = 4 := by decide
/-! # Example 2 -/
@[irreducible] def add (a b : Foo) : Foo := ⟨a.num * b.num⟩
-- should not succeed (and fail fast); exact heartbeat count at time of writing is 21
/--
error: tactic 'decide' failed for proposition
((add 4 1).add 1).add 1 = 4
since its 'Decidable' instance
instDecidableEqFoo (((add 4 1).add 1).add 1) 4
did not reduce to 'isTrue' or 'isFalse'.
After unfolding the instances 'decEqFoo✝', 'instDecidableEqFoo', 'instDecidableEqNat' and
'Nat.decEq', reduction got stuck at the 'Decidable' instance
match h : (((add 4 1).add 1).add 1).num.beq 4 with
| true => isTrue ⋯
| false => isFalse ⋯
-/
#guard_msgs in
example : ((Foo.add 4 1).add 1).add 1 = 4 := by decide